Originally Posted by
Stephanie
Rach xx
You and I are on pretty good terms, I respect your right to your opinion, and I think (I hope) you have no hard feelings for me.
So, I'm saying this totally impartially.
What is the deal with you and agencies ? Your recent postings certainly seem like you are driving at an agenda.. I am out of the
loop, dunno what's going on, so I am just saying it the way I see it. What's up ??
Your other thread I stayed out of (after my initial posts), but now two days later you are at it again from a different angle.. ??
Hm. To try to answer your [rhetorical] question :
Certainly there's a difference b/w pimp and Agency. But it is oh-so-unfortunate that pimps can masquarade as 'Agency' ..
In my very naive and 'sheltered-life' opinion it would be better for all concerned if Agencies (and for that matter the whole
industry) were legalised and regulated. Simple.
On the other thread someone said that "high cash profit margin will always attract the criminal element".. I agree.
Also, as long as something is illegal, it is the 'bad guys' that will take it up. The upstanding tax paying citizen with much to lose
will not become involved in anything illegal (ie running Agency). So for now, I think that is partly why people shy away from Agencies.
[not to mention the myriad of other reasons that have already been discussed] .
Pimp = force. Intimidation. Fraud. Deceit. Coercion. Blackmail. Threat.
Agency = can be benevolent in which case could be a good launching pad for new providers, or could be as bad as pimp.
How can you tell the difference from the outside ???
Solution :
Legalise. Tax. Regulate. Transparency and accountability.