True Independent Escorts and Agency Escorts

[Rachel Divine]

Rachel stated that the agency she came to Ireland with charged 60 - 70 percent. In their favour. With those types of figures, that goes way beyond assistance.

And how did I missed this lovely post?!

I always said it was 50/50 , never 60-70 ... Where did you got those numbers?

[Patricia]

And how did I missed this lovely post?!

I always said it was 50/50 , never 60-70 ... Where did you got those numbers?

Page 5 https://www.escort-ireland.com/board...948#post928948

[Lucy Chambers]

And how did I missed this lovely post?!

I always said it was 50/50 , never 60-70 ... Where did you got those numbers?

IIE. That was your quote. But hey, lets not argue over 10 percent, you still abused and slandered three escorts.

[Lucy Chambers]

Well Rachel may have brought issue up, but a number of people then discussed, hence it was multiple persons posts I deleted.

If you don't think it is fair for any lady to have her personal business dragged up on this thread why was your first contribution to this thread telling us all that Rachel came to Ireland with an agency the charged 60-70%?





We are adults here. I'm asking this thread be kept on topic please, not arranging apologies between escorts.

Um because Rachel put that in the public domain and then used that as her opening post? I see we overlook that. Perhaps we are supposed to only contribute after the admission of escort in agency, you certainly didnt mind adding to that debate in my case

[Lucy Chambers]

Actually. This is a bit of a joke. Have fun peeps...


xx

[UKHeather]

Some but not all. Look at the way Ruhama and other powerful lobby groups see it, they constantly monitor E-I profiles. Any lower priced woman who offers something thats regarded as potentially unsafe sex like "owo" are an example of escorts practicing unsafe sex according to Ruhama and their supporters, they have a powerful voice.

Can you explain why certain independent escorts imply that they are intimidated by lower priced escorts who offer all the services, some of which are potentially dangerous services like owo? Not all escorts are willing to practice potentially unsafe sex like OWO to every customer they meet. Ruhama pushes the idea though that all sex workers offer unsafe sex.

Some escorts offer "owo" to meet demand and in order to compete with the competition. If they don't offer it, then they lose the clients who believe its their absolute right to have it as standard service, all because the next best thing is offering it on her profile. BOO HUU!

Its a serious issue when Ruhama are using "owo" in their submission and public lobbying arguments as an example that all escorts offer potentially unsafe sex.

Its the clients that are creating that demand, through saying that oh they can't get the same experience with a rubber on etc and need owo as standard to make their experience considered worthwhile.. To some of the politicans looking at the sex trade, it looks like its all unsafe, even to many independent escorts on E-I, owo is considered unsafe, thats why they don't offer it.

So for the sake of all clients wearing a rubber while getting a blow job, Ruhamas argument would be less potent. But thats not important to clients is it? so they still demand OWO and draw intense hatred from powerful lobby groups that want to make them criminals.

The escorts that don't offer it are creating an arguably more respectable picture as a whole, than some of the lower priced or even high priced escorts that offer potentially unsafe services, OWO in particular that other escorts simply will not offer as standard service.

People can advocate and tolerate "owo" all they want, but nevertheless Ruhama will use it as quite potent ammunition. If bareback was banned, due to it being considered unsafe, then the argument should be there for escorts to also lobby to get OWO banned, thus removing ammunition for Ruhama, thats providing of course that people want to stop Ruhama from having so much ammunition to use against all escorts as a whole.

Of course not all lower priced or high priced escorts offer unsafe sex, but Ruhama would have the public believe otherwise especially when "owo" is demanded by some clients who see it as a perfectly standard service that should be tolerated.

Well, not al clients are wreckless enough to engage in services like "OWO" yet Ruhama would have you believe that all clients want bareback and unprotected sex like OWO.

Perhaps it is time to bring a modicom of respect and discretion back to the sex industry and have NO favourites listed as standard.

[Patricia]

Actually. This is a bit of a joke. Have fun peeps...


xx

No it is a discussion and Rachel is keeping on topic now, but you are trying to bring it off topic still.

[sexyboy69]

but dependent on money too. The economics of escorting would fill a chapter in any book, truth be told men want to buy sex. Women can sell it

These pseudo classifications of individual type matter little in the end to the average punter- its image and price that rule in a perfectively competitive market despite the packaging

In the end we are all dependent

[Lucy Chambers]

No it is a discussion and Rachel is keeping on topic now, but you are trying to bring it off topic still.

Not at all. I didnt realise Rachel was still posting, I do apologise. Good evening.

[UKHeather]

Sex workers will always find it hard to be respected as long as Ruhama is given a public platform and somewhat of a monopoly over how Irish society views sex workers or "prostituted women" as Ruhama loves to call them.

Its a very strong point to call for more discretion thus less chances for Ruhama and co to fire ammunition, especially with the review system and "favorites enjoyed" section, it really does not leave a lot to the imagination.

In fact its shocking, enough to really shock the very ethos of a sexually repressed catholic society. A society that views women who sell sex as something very dirty and unacceptable, a society that sees those women as having infectious diseases. Something that Ruhama constantly reinforces. All Sex for sale is bad and all sex workers are dumb disease ridden prostitutes who need help. That discrimination is still there, the people who ran the magdalene laundries are still there, and Ruhama is their lovely little creation.

The time and comanionship argument is very discreet, but the review system and favorites advertised on profiles really gives the plot away and almost bizarrely fuels Ruhama and their buddies into doing anything possible to stop escorts that advertise on the site and to stop clients having a right to buy the offered favorites on escorts profile.

You can bet your ass that they are addicted to E-I's review section and use it to plot best on how to shut down E-I.

They even selected clients reviews in their submission for condemnation, that tells you that they are avid readers of the review section. For people who hate the website, they sure spend a lot of time reading it. Perhaps they should open contribute more to the debates on E-I, lots of sex workers are on E-I, and lots seem to disagree with Ruhama. Ruhama is scared of those escorts.

If the escorts left more to the imagination especially on their profiles and reviews, then it would draw a lot less hatred for sure and would not flame the radical feminists so much.

I feel that the inclusion of favourites, (and yes reviews) also makes clients more demanding. Whatever happened to sex being a pleasurable and discreet encounter between two adults?
I hate the whole, 'Boo hoo She made me wear a condom and wouldnt let me stick it to her up the arse, despite it being on her favourites!"
It dehumanises us.
I would love to see favourites and reviews abolished.