Blog Comments

Was it in the old wild west and she was wanted dead or alive?

[QUOTE=Nicelad;bt2611]Q3. Was he sleepwalking when he shot her?[/QUOTE]

Afraid not nicelad but great thinking. :)

Q3. Was he sleepwalking when he shot her?

[QUOTE=Doozer;bt2605]3 ok either the poice would have done the same thing
They were racist
Or it was during WWII or something when a man could shoot a woman



Can I say she probably deserved it or would that be too sexist LOL[/QUOTE]

Much too sexist methinks and none of the above. :)

[QUOTE=Doozer;bt2604]2 answering machine[/QUOTE]

That would make sense Doozer but not the answer. :)

[QUOTE=Doozer;bt2603]It wouldnt just be him. lol
Ok this is to do with chewing gum being banned in Singapour right[/QUOTE]

Correct Doozer as the sale and use of chewing gum are illegal in Singapore. Quick thinking there. Well done. :)

[QUOTE=Doozer;bt2602]Surely if the banknote had been torn in half then there would only be half a pic of a president which wasnt mentioned in the question[/QUOTE]

True Doozer but two halves make a whole . :)

3 ok either the poice would have done the same thing
They were racist
Or it was during WWII or something when a man could shoot a woman



Can I say she probably deserved it or would that be too sexist LOL

2 answering machine

It wouldnt just be him. lol
Ok this is to do with chewing gum being banned in Singapour right

Surely if the banknote had been torn in half then there would only be half a pic of a president which wasnt mentioned in the question

Answer to Q2.

A burglar had broken into the woman's house and taken all her savings. In trying to collect the last note that was stuffed into a jar, he tore it in half. She reported the incident to the police, and then took the half note to her bank. They told her that a man had been in that morning with the matching half.

[QUOTE=Legswideopen;bt2598]Question 2
Did the picture have incriminating evidence ???[/QUOTE]

You could say it does Legs but not a vital clue.

Here are a couple of clues. :)

The criminal had committed the crime in the womans house.
The criminal had visited the bank.
The picture of the president is well known.

Question 2
Did the picture have incriminating evidence ???

Thanks for That magic
Just 1 more to get now

[QUOTE=Legswideopen;bt2594]Question 2
Just read this different ways. Was the woman arrested.[/QUOTE]

Woman not arrested Legs. :)

[QUOTE=Legswideopen;bt2593]11 11 1911
Just typed this and very quick. Will come back to this one later.
Was the person entering the data being lazy[/QUOTE]

You are far too close for me to say no Legs. :)

When data entry clerks entered customer records onto the computer, the date field had to be completed. However they often did not have that data, so they simply keyed in 11/11/11

Question 2
Just read this different ways. Was the woman arrested.

11 11 1911
Just typed this and very quick. Will come back to this one later.
Was the person entering the data being lazy

[QUOTE=Legswideopen;bt2591]Question 3
Was the survey done in the streets??
Or was it over the phone ??
Was the survey carried out this year??[/QUOTE]

Great questions Legs and I have no idea about the answers but here are a few clues to that question.

Although it appeared as though many customers had been born on November 11, the real distribution of births of the company's customers was not unusual.

All the data had been entered on a computer database.

The customers appeared to have birthdays on November 11, 1911