Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 30

Thread: Robbery in Cork

  1. Default Excuse me but......

    ........Hasn't anyone noticed the bad spelling and grammer of "Sarah's" posts? It looks like the spelling and grammer of someone who doesn't have have a good command of the English languge. We all know that Sarah's spelling and grammer is perfect, so I think Patricia should get her rats out!!!!!

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    5,608
    Blog Entries
    1
    Reviews
    95

    Default not big problem

    *This part has been removed until investigaton is closed*


    After short conversetion with him I need to put a shadow on review system.
    I've been told that those girls offered service for lower price( instead 150 offered 50e if a client will leave good reviews.I bet that was good transaction for both but now I don;t know does review system is good idea at all.Does a prices are genuine ?is it 50e instead 250e now?And I don't belive that was single incident.
    So is it an escort lowering prices to get positive reviews responsinable for gap in the system or should be a client who agree and finished transaction , be named and shamed?[/QUOTE]

    To be honest i cant see this becoming a big problem because unless they do it on an ongoing basis they will be shown up by genuine reviewers and i cant see a greedy escort
    doing too many punts for fifty euro also they have been reviewed positively by what i consider some reputable reviewers their feedback now will be intresting.
    To my mind the worrying thing is the theft because it will cause mistrust and this will make for an unhealthy envoirment for everybody and while we might not always be happy with
    the service we get i was always confident that 99% of the girls would not steal from ure
    wallet.It wont be healthy going to meet a new girl with this at the back of ure mind does
    it mean now i should only see girls i know and trust

  3. #13

    Default Innocent Until Proven?

    It goes without saying I wouldn't take the side of any girl who steals. But where exactly is the proof that these girls stole? The word of the man that lost the money? The landlord? Have they charges pending? None of those are proof positive that those girls stole money. There could be 1000 scenarios to that story and its a bit over the top that Sarah has now assumed the role of an Irish judge. He could have lost the money, forgot the money, miscounted the money, one girl could have stolen it, he could have an issue with the girls and on and on and on. Without knowing the TRUE facts and proof POSITIVE Sarah has took it upon herself to make this public. In this country as in most of the civilized world, people are presumed innocent until proven guilty. So what happens if those girl/girls are found not to be guilty? They would have a serious libel case against this site. Again I would back no thieves but this is just plain wrong.
    Last edited by Langer; 07-05-08 at 10:17.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,059
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mature Jackie View Post
    ........Hasn't anyone noticed the bad spelling and grammer of "Sarah's" posts? It looks like the spelling and grammer of someone who doesn't have have a good command of the English languge. We all know that Sarah's spelling and grammer is perfect, so I think Patricia should get her rats out!!!!!
    Becuse of fact english isn't my first language I do mistakes in grammer and spellings
    I will pay more attention in the future

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,059
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Langer View Post
    It goes without saying I wouldn't take the side of any girl who steals. But where exactly is the proof that these girls stole? The word of the man that lost the money? The landlord? Have they charges pending? None of those are proof positive that those girls stole money. There could be 1000 scenarios to that story and its a bit over the top that Sarah has now assumed the role of an Irish judge. He could have lost the money, forgot the money, miscounted the money, one girl could have stolen it, he could have an issue with the girls and on and on and on. Without knowing the TRUE facts and proof POSITIVE Sarah has took it upon herself to make this public. In this country as in most of the civilized world people are presumed innocent until proven guilty. So what happens if those girl/girls are found not to be guilty? They would have a serious libel case against this site. Again I would back no thieves but this is just plain wrong.
    That's what I said:
    On client came out of their apartment 500e (insetead 250e)shorter and went to the police.

    It doesn't say they've done it.He could dropped money on the floor and left.
    Before that I put in doubt it happend at all.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    5,608
    Blog Entries
    1
    Reviews
    95

    Default cute

    Quote Originally Posted by sarah View Post
    Becuse of fact english isn't my first language I do mistakes in grammer and spellings
    I will pay more attention in the future
    I always understand what u are trying to say and i think it makes u seem all cute and innocent and sexy

  7. #17

    Default

    *This part has been removed until investigaton is closed*

    After short conversetion with him I need to put a shadow on review system.
    I've been told that those girls offered service for lower price( instead 150 offered 50e if a client will leave good reviews.I bet that was good transaction for both but now I don;t know does review system is good idea at all.Does a prices are genuine ?is it 50e instead 250e now?And I don't belive that was single incident.
    So is it an escort lowering prices to get positive reviews responsinable for gap in the system or should be a client who agree and finished transaction , be named and shamed?[/QUOTE]

    That is just not the done thing, legally or morally. No names and numbers should have been put on public display until it was beyond doubt and then they should be put up in BOLD letters IF they were proven guilty. Its wrong Sarah and should be removed. Trial by E-I Forum is not the way to go. IŽd be the first to slag, ridicule and mock anyone but this goes well beyond that.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,059
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    [QUOTE=Langer;26159]

    That is just not the done thing, legally or morally. No names and numbers should have been put on public display until it was beyond doubt and then they should be put up in BOLD letters IF they were proven guilty. [QUOTE]

    I need to admit you are right at this point, I was wrong.
    There won't be any trial going out here

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    5,608
    Blog Entries
    1
    Reviews
    95

    Default late

    [QUOTE=sarah;26162][QUOTE=Langer;26159]

    That is just not the done thing, legally or morally. No names and numbers should have been put on public display until it was beyond doubt and then they should be put up in BOLD letters IF they were proven guilty.

    I need to admit you are right at this point, I was wrong.
    There won't be any trial going out here
    probably a bit late guilty or innocent i think the harm is done and they probably wont
    ever work here again

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,795

    Default

    All they have to do is change Pictures,and numbers and that s it.
    I m still lurking sometimes ;-)

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •