"orla from dublin" fake pics still up

[hp2685]

i say if the picture is fake, then there should be also a disclaimer from her admitting that the picture is fake to avoid confusion and possible disapointment for a punter.
it just shouldn't state that the pictures are 'genuine'!!

just write something like: ''note to user: as a measure to protect my own privacy i have decided to put up a picture of somebody else, however the girl in the picture does look very similar to me.''

i could live with that. opinions?
hp

[ber]

i say if the picture is fake, then there should be also a disclaimer from her admitting that the picture is fake to avoid confusion and possible disapointment for a punter.
it just shouldn't state that the pictures are 'genuine'!!

just write something like: ''note to user: as a measure to protect my own privacy i have decided to put up a picture of somebody else, however the girl in the picture does look very similar to me.''

i could live with that. opinions?
hp

what proof will be given that she is similar

[hp2685]

well it's difficult to put proof for that... i guess you just have to give her the benefit of the doubt and take a gamble there.

[ber]

well it's difficult to put proof for that... i guess you just have to give her the benefit of the doubt and take a gamble there.

I think experience has shown us the odds for the punter are poor

[hp2685]

i agree.
i'm also not one to take a gamble too often. i judge an escort by the looks of the foto, then the services provided and crucially and most importantly the reviews. that system has been kind. most of the time i've been very satisfied. the few times i did take a gamble there was probably a 50-50 success rate. if it's 20 quid, well who gives a shit. but when it's closer to 300 quid, well i can only agree with you.
still i think it should say that orla's pics are not genuine. that doesn't mean that i will look her up though.

[ber]

i agree.
i'm also not one to take a gamble too often. i judge an escort by the looks of the foto, then the services provided and crucially and most importantly the reviews. that system has been kind. most of the time i've been very satisfied. the few times i did take a gamble there was probably a 50-50 success rate. if it's 20 quid, well who gives a shit. but when it's closer to 300 quid, well i can only agree with you.
still i think it should say that orla's pics are not genuine. that doesn't mean that i will look her up though.

It does that at the moment even if an escort has genuine pictures and does reviews but hasent verified the pictures she dosent get a green tick.one case is caterine the german lady in cork at the moment i can personaly verify her picture100% she has 20 odd reviews is a very good escort but mustnt have officaly verefied her photo so she has a red x.

[sharpe223]

in my humble opinion orla is worth a gamble she is a very attractive girl also very chatty i enjoyed my hour with her and will go back i could become a regular with her her number is 0857084067 but she doesn,t work all the time as far as i know

[delmonte]

Everyone is missing the main point, according to Pat's new system the escort with unverified pics should not be able to opt out of reviews...
If the reviews stayed up everyone could be warned....but I do still think that even with reviews it is unfair to stick up false pics, That is why us punters when posting a review should pay more attention when clicking on the question of how satisfied we are with the accuracy of photos instead of just clicking through it.
I have read loads of reviews where punters give a good review but dont condemn the accuracy of photos even when a lot of them are not accurate,, maybe the options should be made clearer eg. instead of, "not satisfied" it should say " not the girl in the photo" and "photo must have been taken 10 years ago"
This of course brings up another common inaccuracy...AGE 23,,,I wouldn't like to be holding my breath since most of these girls were 23..

Seriously though we should be more critical in our reviews of these points, (myself included) but we all seem to just skip to the discriptive part of the review.

Finished my rant..