Should an escort be allowed post the same fake photos after they are proven fake?

[monster_monster]

First of all sorry for my low english level but I would like to reply to you Monster.

Some days ago I have seen that you have reported an escort who is in my favourite list for fake photo. (on the 18/07).
Then her profile has been suspended, she changed her photos and now she still has the status unverified photo on her profile.

I met this girl and I can confirm 100% that the first photos or the new ones that she has now on her profile are 100% geniune.
(And more in a lot of her reveiws, people are saying she is the girl on the pictures and the pictures were always the same. I am checking her profile often to see if she is back in Belfast )

I don't know what to think about your post as on one hand I am happy to have people like you helping us to choose the right girl for an appointment but on the other hand I think in some case you are causing troubles for nothing to girls. And keep in mind that for them this is their job.

So my question is : If someone on this forum can make change the status of an escort from verified to unverified, can someone else correct this if he met the girl and can confirm that the photos are geniune ?

Thank you,

Ben.

First off I don't really care what you can or can't vouch for, for all I know you could be the escort in question or a PIMP/Agency. All I did was submit a fake photo report of an escort when I found her images on another site. Also just for safe measure I made sure to submit a second report when I saw her new photos as they too can be found else where (HERE).

If the girl is who she claims to be then all she has to do is resubmit an new verification photo and E-I will change her status back to Verified. If she can't do that, then I suppose................

[benben]

Do you report a profile for fake photos because you find the same photos on another website ??? Don't you think that another girl could take her photos and put them on her profile on another website ?

All I can say is that I met her and that she is the girl on the picture. And don't worry OMG I am not the escort or an agency. So even if you don't care, your system is shit and you have paranoia I suppose..................

[Nicole]

Why should it matter if she bought the rights to the images or not? If she has images of someone bar herself on her profile then should they not be classified as fake?

As I pointed out above you could easily get your friend to pose for you and get permission to use those images, we have seen this before and the photos were removed. So why should it be any different if you purchase the images??? If anything it would be worse as some model that may have nothing to do with the escorting industry has her pics plastered on an escort directory, which in my opinion isn't really fair on her either.

Photos belong to her and what we have here is a legal loophole. She owns a rights to a photos and that is why she is entitled to use them. However, as she doesnt have a verification picture to prove that it is her in the pictures (which is apparent) we will not be verifying this pictures and we will make sure at least one fake photo report is active to inform people about source of this pictures. At least it is a common knowledge that it is not her on this pictures.

[monster_monster]

Do you report a profile for fake photos because you find the same photos on another website ??? Don't you think that another girl could take her photos and put them on her profile on another website ?

All I can say is that I met her and that she is the girl on the picture. And don't worry OMG I am not the escort or an agency. So even if you don't care, your system is shit and you have paranoia I suppose..................

Why is she advertising in Romania then??? Also finding her photos in Spain. Trust me, it's not the system that's dodgy

[monster_monster]

Why is she advertising in Romania then??? Also finding her photos in Spain. Trust me, it's not the system that's dodgy

forgot to add, HERE is another one, you know, just for safe keeping

[monster_monster]

Photos belong to her and what we have here is a legal loophole. She owns a rights to a photos and that is why she is entitled to use them. However, as she doesnt have a verification picture to prove that it is her in the pictures (which is apparent) we will not be verifying this pictures and we will make sure at least one fake photo report is active to inform people about source of this pictures. At least it is a common knowledge that it is not her on this pictures.

I realise that she owns usage right to the photos but I still don't see why she should be allowed use them. As I keep pointing out (but it doesn't get answered), this is the exact same as another escort using her friends photos.

Are we now going to have a huge amount of girls stating that it's their friend in the photo but they are allowed use them. IMO there is no difference.

[dub1]

I ask this as I have submitted a fake photo report about one particular escort (don't bother asking for names) and was told that the fake images would not be removed. Granted these images were NEVER VERIFIED, as the escort had bought the images from a stock image gallery and even though they are fake they will not be removed from E-I as she has permission to use them from the owners of the images.

I put forward the case that this is the same as an escort getting a friend to pose for a photo and use that instead of her own, but alas, still told that the images will stay.

Would like to hear from escorts and clients alike.

Course they should their paying for the fecking add aren't they

[City Gent]

I have to say I'm with Monster on ALL the points he makes, if the photos submitted are NOT photos of the lady in the profile, if it's the escorts sister or they are owned by the escort or are photos of the escorts dog what's the bloody point of verifying them it's NOT the escort.

If you advertised your 1970 Capri for sale in the Auto Trader with a photo of a 1970 Ferrari do you think you would ever sell it?


CG

[ChiefHandker]

Is this even in dispute?! How..

If an escort posts pictures that are proven fake it's solely to deceive their clients, so I find it incredulous that EI are currently fine with this, knowing certain profile ads are a complete misrepresentation and basically false advertising. It maybe even shows to what regard they hold the irish client.

[samlad]

Who says we are fine with it? We've already had a discussion with Judy (by the way, the poll question seems to imply 'should proven fake photos not be allowed to be posted again' as a general problem; it doesn't seem to be relevant to this as an individual case). Of course we don't allow fake photos to be posted again if they've been reported fake.

In this case, there needs to be clarification:

1) The escort owns the copyrights to these pictures; there is a legal loop-hole that we currently cannot combat because as she owns them, we have no right to remove them... however....

2) As we know that this is not the girl in the pictures, we will not verify them

3) This has been brought to the attention of the public on this thread, so that should be fair enough

4) There is an active fake photo report attached to her profile to show the source of these pictures; this has been argued about between E-I and Judy and we have told her that we are not under any obligation to try to 'cover up' this information, and as tshe is not the person in the photos, then the report will remain active, but as she owns the pictures, we will leave them

5) The false advertising is on the part of the escort, not E-I

6) If you looked at a 1970 Capri for sale in the Auto Trader with a photo of a 1970 Ferrari do you think you would buy it?

Just to add, we don't agree with this either. It's not our regard to the Irish client that should be concerned here, it's the escort's. If she is using pictures of someone else, she runs the risk of getting bad reviews.

Yes, escorts pay to advertise with us but we do have rules. In this case, the rules don't cover such an eventuality and we need to look into the legal implications of this before we impose anything. I completely see the clients' perspective here and we have taken measures to ensure that these pictures have a fake photo report and are not verified.