Unverified Photos- Unacceptable !

[monster_monster]

It is so easy to verify a photo. If you are not verified then you should not be allowed to advertise. Simple as.


EI is taking the piss.


Just not good enough.

couldn't agree more, escorts without verified pics shouldn't be allowed to advertise at all. I also feel that the verification system isn't tough enough either. In the last month alone I have submitted 176 fake photo reports (that have been accepted, some weren't) of these obviously the majority were of escorts with non-verified images but there were still a hell of a lot of escorts that had their images verified.

Some of these girls even had multiple reviews, I think the most reviews was about 19 for one escort. There was one report submitted last night that the escort in question has verified images, 8 reviews and I caught her submitting fakes before, today when I checked I see there is a report but her images are back verified

The only way to stop fakers is to become a lot stricter on the verification process but we as punters really have to turn on our heels at the first suspicion of a scam.

[samlad]

Don't mind Alec,

He's just upset because nobody can ask for his opinon, given the number of reviews he hasn't actually stacked up

[Alec Horan]

Sam has given you a suggestion as to how to avoid these problems, if you had no intention of listening, why carry on whining on the boards?
Im sure the good honest people here on E-I want to talk about something fun, not this boring old stuff again
So to lighten the mood...

i actually made a constructive reply.......did you read it ? was i not making a valid point re wasting time travelling to an appointment, is the automatic non verification because of non reviewing also a valid point.


the 'good honest people' want good HONEST photos dont you think ?

[monster_monster]

Sam has given you a suggestion as to how to avoid these problems, if you had no intention of listening, why carry on whining on the boards?
Im sure the good honest people here on E-I want to talk about something fun, not this boring old stuff again
So to lighten the mood...

I think Alec's subject matter is of much more concern to the general punting population than lets say a Good Morning thread. We all love a bit of fun the the boards but when something like this is brought up I don't think it's good enough to say we shouldn't be talking about it and should resort to posting jokes etc. instead.

[samlad]

couldn't agree more, escorts without verified pics shouldn't be allowed to advertise at all. I also feel that the verification system isn't tough enough either. In the last month alone I have submitted 176 fake photo reports (that have been accepted, some weren't) of these obviously the majority were of escorts with non-verified images but there were still a hell of a lot of escorts that had their images verified.

Some of these girls even had multiple reviews, I think the most reviews was about 19 for one escort. There was one report submitted last night that the escort in question has verified images, 8 reviews and I caught her submitting fakes before, today when I checked I see there is a report but her images are back verified

The only way to stop fakers is to become a lot stricter on the verification process but we as punters really have to turn on our heels at the first suspicion of a scam.

But you seem to be doing a good job weeding them out, monster_monster.

You know, how are escorts supposed to know whether a client is genuine or not? This works two ways really. Escorts are entitled to their anonimity just like you guys are, and it would be interesting to see how many clients would be willing to forward a picture of their faces over the internet so that escorts could deem them worthy or not?

This old chestnut comes around as inevitably as the seasons, and the points have been covered before.

If a client has any suspicions regarding an escort, don't go... it's that simple. Book something you might be sure of. It's a gamble that you take when seeing an escort I'm afraid.

To answer you questions, Alec (although I suspect that you aren't really taking this seriously anyway), here goes:

1 - reviewers are totally untrustworthy morons
2 - what is your verification process ?
3 - why should i ask, this is about photos I aint interested in some other guys opinion
4 - thats what i do, but if you actually published a real photo then there is less chance of me wasting my time in a car travelling to said appointment

1) That's your opinion, and limits your chances of choosing a genuine escort
2) The escort has to send in a face picture and this is compared to the rest of the photos. We often blur the pictures on behalf of the escorts
3) Refer to my answer in point 1)
4) If there's any doubt, don't travel in the first place

[TomEA]

i actually made a constructive reply.......did you read it ? was i not making a valid point re wasting time travelling to an appointment, is the automatic non verification because of non reviewing also a valid point.


the 'good honest people' want good HONEST photos dont you think ?

I read it all Alec, and no one is asking you to drive anywhere for anything, simply saying if you thinkg girls with the unverified pics are such scammers, dont look at them.

1)Alec see's a girl he likes mhmmm
2)Alec checks where she is....Ooooh near him (going well so far)
3) Alec sees the pictures are unverified
4) Alec grabs the tissues and spends the night searching through old threads :/


Bar a couple of them most seems to be sensible enough to leave these alone or take a leap of faith, No one is telling you to do the same

[samlad]

i actually made a constructive reply.......did you read it ? was i not making a valid point re wasting time travelling to an appointment, is the automatic non verification because of non reviewing also a valid point.


the 'good honest people' want good HONEST photos dont you think ?

How many people are actually honest?

[Alec Horan]

Samlad,

Fair enough if those are your answers. its just that a system which is far from perfect could be made a lot better. simple as. I could do all the above . sure . but the fuller and more accurate the info on here the less the need to risk disappointment.


Peeping Tom,
FO !

[TomEA]

I think Alec's subject matter is of much more concern to the general punting population than lets say a Good Morning thread. We all love a bit of fun the the boards but when something like this is brought up I don't think it's good enough to say we shouldn't be talking about it and should resort to posting jokes etc. instead.

I never said that these things shouldnt be brought up, saying a specific girls profile pictures are fake is one thing, thats warning other punters and usually for the good of the general punting population but (and dont get me wrong here) whats this going to acheive, alec doesnt want to listen to 'the untrustworthy morons' that are the reviewers, and doesnt want to listen to anyones opinion, why do the punters need his opinion pushed on them?

[Alec Horan]

How many people are actually honest?

ask your fellow mod Tom, it was he that said it in the first place. see his post above