View Poll Results: Should the Top Reviewers be removed from the Escort Reviews Page ...

Voters
62. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    23 37.10%
  • No

    20 32.26%
  • Don't care

    19 30.65%
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 42

Thread: Should the Top Reviewers be removed from the Escort Reviews Page ....

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,473
    Blog Entries
    2
    Reviews
    36

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lovethegirls View Post
    One thing after another. Blah blah blah. Next someone will want to redesign the whole site.
    I dont think you would be so glib or uncharitable if your own privacy was at stake, but you still wanted to contribute to E-I .

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to ksteve For This Useful Post:

    EscortSelina (18-06-11)

  3. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    16,753
    Reviews
    57

    Default

    I have said this before, TR badges have been removed because some were abusing there status, is having there name so prominently on the site not an extension of this so the same reasons to remove the TR badges should apply here, just logic really..

    I'd prefer to see the latest reviews or some sort of a role over system placed in that spot, extending the top ladies list is like a piece of sting, how long do we really need it to be?
    Last edited by anon361; 18-06-11 at 11:22.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to anon361 For This Useful Post:

    Lucy Chambers (18-06-11)

  5. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,260
    Reviews
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ksteve View Post
    I dont think you would be so glib or uncharitable if your own privacy was at stake, but you still wanted to contribute to E-I .
    Im not being uncharitable just sick of the same thing being discussed time and time again.
    Last edited by lovethegirls; 18-06-11 at 11:21.
    “Once Everton has touched you nothing will be the same”
    Alan Ball


    Justice For The 96

  6. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    8,242
    Reviews
    10

    Default

    Wait, Mark's a decent skin.

    Has he explained why's he worried about his privacy?

  7. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    5,293
    Reviews
    15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lovethegirls View Post
    Im not being uncharitable just sick of the same thing being discussed time and time again.
    Its called evolution!!! It is only through discussion we can see what people want and see improvements. Besides, to stay topical the site might need a full redesign, no harm there.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to doodlebug For This Useful Post:

    EscortSelina (18-06-11)

  9. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    3,916
    Blog Entries
    1
    Reviews
    33

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lucy chambers View Post
    Mark has said that the reason he is worried is because with him submitting so many reviews, he will soon be on the top reviewers list, and more visible. The only compromise for himself and KSteve would be to remove the list. Plus, most people are saying it serves no purpose. Better to double the amount of top reviewed girls really.
    I never really understood its purpose myself.
    I just didn't think it was relevant to Marks problem, as I thought Mark had no problem being there as More444.


    Anyway I agree the space would put to much better use promoting the other top escorts.

    One thing I never got was how banned users could be included in this group ! I know they have the number of reviews to be there, but come on !
    Last edited by dave1dave; 18-06-11 at 11:33.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to dave1dave For This Useful Post:

    ksteve (18-06-11)

  11. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    937
    Reviews
    14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by laura kiss View Post
    Good idea,i already voted,for me dosent matter...
    Agree with Laura. Doesn't bother me as long as the reviews are reliable.

  12. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,473
    Blog Entries
    2
    Reviews
    36

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lovethegirls View Post
    Im not being uncharitable just sick of the same thing being discussed time and time again.
    I dont remember there being much ( if any ) board discussion on these specific issues over the last 6 months - year. Its only really been in the last few days !!

  13. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,260
    Reviews
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ksteve View Post
    I dont remember there being much ( if any ) board discussion on these specific issues over the last 6 months - year. Its only really been in the last few days !!
    My original comment may have been harsh. As you said its on going the last few days. Sam has made it clear that the rules wont be changed. I do feel sorry for Mark444 as like everyone i think he is a great poster and reviewer. What i was trying to say in my first post and sorry if it came across as smart is the rules wont be changed according to sam so we should move on.
    “Once Everton has touched you nothing will be the same”
    Alan Ball


    Justice For The 96

  14. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to lovethegirls For This Useful Post:

    doodlebug (18-06-11), Lucy Chambers (18-06-11)

  15. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    10,093
    Blog Entries
    2
    Reviews
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mousey View Post
    I'm going to wait and see which way the wind is blowing before I vote.

    Ah yes always one that sits on the fence Lol.

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •