No to owo?

[City Gent]

Ok guys, this might cause some contraversy, but the question needs to be asked. Should advertising OWO as a favourite be banned to discourage escorts offering it and punters looking for it?? I've had a few scares in my time and it's all down to OWO and reverse oral. I love noting better than 'going down' but God only knows what I'm going down to. Let's face it, it's risky business. When I'm browsing these days I look for girls not offering OWO but soon as I ring and ask is OWO I'm told yes !! I'm not blaming the girls here. Its a cut throat business and they're only offering what the punters are looking for. I'm sure most dread the thought of it. Gone be with the days when I would give an escort an extra €50 for OWO on top of the €150 standard charge. Now most of the girls advertising for €80 for 30 mins are including it. You nearly have to pay more to find a girl not offering it!!Point is it's not safe and girls offering bareback would be banned. With the increase in STI's it's getting too risky and as a punter I want to leave an escort satisfied and in the knowledge that neither one if us has passed anything onto the other.

My suggestion would be if your a guy and don't like OWO don't visit a lady that advertises OWO, Don't chastise a Lady that does offer it it's her choice, and NEVER put bareback in the same category as OWO.


CG

[Lucy Chambers]

There have been a number of threads like this lately. I have kept quiet on previous threads but feel this is getting out of hand. Banning OWO is simply being ridiculous!! There is a common misconception that seeing escorts and escorting is “safe”. There is no such thing as safe sex!! There is spectrum of safety but it is never completely safe. This goes for anyone who has sex with multiple partners, not just with escorts.

Certainly the risk associated with OWO is greater than with covered oral. But it would be misinformation to suggest that it is anywhere near to what the risk is associated with unprotected intercourse.

To start banning certain practices that go on in the privacy of a bedroom between and escort and a client is policing this to a whole new level. We might as well be like Sweden and just ban escorting all together.

It’s very simple – if you don’t want OWO – cover up. You have no right to stop other clients from getting the service or from escorts giving it. And if you want to take it to its logical conclusion than you shouldn’t do French kissing either.

There is also huge ignorance among some clients and getting a ‘scare’ is the first time their eyes are opened to fact that maybe they should be a little more educated on the subject of STI’s.

There are only two STI’s that really count – HIV and Hep B. The main modes of sexual transmission for both is unprotected sexual intercourse (vaginal or anal). While there is a possible risk of transmission by other unprotected sexual practices, it is small. There is a vaccine for Hep B – so one can get vaccinated quite easily to prevent transmission (and should do if you’re involved in this activity).

As for the others – chalmydiae, gonnorhoea, syphilis, Herpes simplex (genital herpes) – there is actually treatment for all conditions. Clearly there are implications if you have a partner. But again this is your decision to see escorts. (I am single).

Bottom line – seeing escorts or sleeping with multiple partners is dangerous. If you are involved in this then it’s up to the individual to decide on the level of precautions one takes (not for a community/ website/ or state to impose on individuals).

I made a calculated educated decision long before I ever got into this. My only option for sex is with escorts. For me FK and OWO are essential. In addition I get checked three monthly regardless of symptoms, have been vaccinated for Hep B.

I honestly think this is getting out of hand and if the OP’s suggestion is implemented, eventually this will be little more than an expensive lap dancing site.

I have no intention of simply fighting with other posters and believe everyone is entitled to one’s own opinion. But what the OP is suggesting is encroaching on my rights (and in fact the only reason I see escorts)

Cool post

[andreea92]

Ok guys, this might cause some contraversy, but the question needs to be asked. Should advertising OWO as a favourite be banned to discourage escorts offering it and punters looking for it?? I've had a few scares in my time and it's all down to OWO and reverse oral. I love noting better than 'going down' but God only knows what I'm going down to. Let's face it, it's risky business. When I'm browsing these days I look for girls not offering OWO but soon as I ring and ask is OWO I'm told yes !! I'm not blaming the girls here. Its a cut throat business and they're only offering what the punters are looking for. I'm sure most dread the thought of it. Gone be with the days when I would give an escort an extra €50 for OWO on top of the €150 standard charge. Now most of the girls advertising for €80 for 30 mins are including it. You nearly have to pay more to find a girl not offering it!!Point is it's not safe and girls offering bareback would be banned. With the increase in STI's it's getting too risky and as a punter I want to leave an escort satisfied and in the knowledge that neither one if us has passed anything onto the other.

i`m working in this bussines for some time now and i listed in my favorites OWO as well as cim but i never had any problems and i hope i never will but i wont give it up because this is what my clients love the most.it is a chance i assume as well as other escorts....but it comes with the job....as well as truck driver can fall a sleep while driving and die...or 1000 other examples like this....

[Lucy Chambers]

Morpheus, sorry I'm new to posting so don't know how to attach a response to your post. I'm not encroching in your right. Fair enough what goes on between 2 people is up to them, but not when the lady is offering a service to the public. Is it ok for me to have bareback with some escort you use on a regular basis just cos it's between us and I pay her more? Granted, bareback is riskier and should be outlawed but the risk of catching something from some girl shoving 500+ dicks a year in her mouth is there!!!

You kind of missed the point, slightly. Someone who ''shoves 500+ dicks in her mouth yearly'' as you so kindly put it, is going to be an awful lot more careful about going and having full STI screens and throat swabs than someone who isnt.

But lets look at this in a different way. If your wishes were to come true, you would have an awful lot of clients still looking for OWO, and an awful lot of escorts giving it. What you wouldn't have, is a clear indication of who these people may be- at present you do, under the form of the favourites list. I actually believe bareback should be advertised also, it is being offered and it is happening but at present we do not know who by. You have the right to choose- exercise it. Pontificating will only stop one person having ''fun''- you.


NB...Still giggling at the outlawed bareback bit- tell me, do you stand outside nightlclubs with a bible also?

[Rayden]

It is never wise to "shove" a dick into one's mouth. A clear choking hazard.

[Lucy Chambers]

It is never wise to "shove" a dick into one's mouth. A clear choking hazard.

Depends on the angle. The throat is actually quite cavernous

[Rayden]

Depends on the angle. The throat is actually quite cavernous

Must work on my deepthroat skills then.

[Lucy Chambers]

Must work on my deepthroat skills then.

Lay on the edge of the bed and tip your head back off the edge of it. Opens the throat

[Rayden]

Lay on the edge of the bed and tip your head back off the edge of it. Opens the throat

(Hopefully) meeting a sexy TS today. Will give it a try. Thanx Lucy.

[Morpheus]

But lets look at this in a different way. If your wishes were to come true, you would have an awful lot of clients still looking for OWO, and an awful lot of escorts giving it. What you wouldn't have, is a clear indication of who these people may be- at present you do, under the form of the favourites list. I actually believe bareback should be advertised also, it is being offered and it is happening but at present we do not know who by. You have the right to choose- exercise it. Pontificating will only stop one person having ''fun''- you.


NB...Still giggling at the outlawed bareback bit- tell me, do you stand outside nightlclubs with a bible also?

Well said Luce. The point I was trying to bring across in my rant was that people should be allowed to do whatever they want - clients and escorts alike. There should transparency (as in the favourites) to allow both clients and escorts to choose who they want to see. Banning something on the favourites list is not going to decrease it's demand and will only lead to more secrecy in terms of what is actually going on.(Which incidentally is exactly the same reasoning of the TORL/Ruhamma campaign - i.e criminalize clients seeing escorts and you will wipe out the demand and therefore eradicate escorting! How delusional!!!)