Escort Fake Photos and Reviews

[monster_monster]

Do you think reviewers that state it's definitely the girl in the pics in a review should have their review ratted if that photo is later found to be fake?

Yesterday I submitted 10 fake photo reports on this site, out of the 10 only 4 had reviews, granted some reviews state that it's not the girl in the pics but loads state it was. So if it's not the girls in the photos then shouldn't these reviews get ratted seeing as the reviewer is posting a false review? What do you folks think.

[ThomasJ]

I think ratted might be a bit extreme - I have on occasion ticked the wrong box when submitting a review - perhaps a yellow card for a first offence.

[anon361]

Unfortunately girls operate a bait and switch when they are not working so they get a girl to fill in for them so it's possible for different clients to see different ladies from the single profile, also in fairness a lot of the time images are so photoshoped you wouldn't be sure it's the girl, you'd just know there's a strong resemblance so it's probably her, happened to me more than once.

[samlad]

I disagree too, for reasons that Anon and Thomas have stated.

[monster_monster]

I think ratted might be a bit extreme - I have on occasion ticked the wrong box when submitting a review - perhaps a yellow card for a first offence.

I'm talking more about the people that say, "She is 100% the girl in the photos" in the review body, not the V.Happy/Happy option. If you click one of those but have stated that it's not the girl then peoples common sense will kick in and know what's after happening.

Unfortunately girls operate a bait and switch when they are not working so they get a girl to fill in for them so it's possible for different clients to see different ladies from the single profile, also in fairness a lot of the time images are so photoshoped you wouldn't be sure it's the girl, you'd just know there's a strong resemblance so it's probably her, happened to me more than once.

But surely people could say something like "not too sure if it was defo the girl as her pics are blurred, but the body was pretty spot on".

I'm not trying to burn honest reviewers here, but more to stop the fakes from getting away with what they seem to easily be able to do.

[anon361]

I'm talking more about the people that say, "She is 100% the girl in the photos" in the review body, not the V.Happy/Happy option. If you click one of those but have stated that it's not the girl then peoples common sense will kick in and know what's after happening.



But surely people could say something like "not too sure if it was defo the girl as her pics are blurred, but the body was pretty spot on".

I'm not trying to burn honest reviewers here, but more to stop the fakes from getting away with what they seem to easily be able to do.

I know but one guy might say yes 100% her, next guy 100% not her, unless they compare notes neither would know mif they saw the same lady or even if the images she had up at the time were the same for when both booked the appointment, I could visit a girl, comment yes it's her, next week she puts up fake images, guy says it's not her and fake photo report submitted, am I to blame or the lady for switching?

[monster_monster]

I know but one guy might say yes 100% her, next guy 100% not her, unless they compare notes neither would know mif they saw the same lady or even if the images she had up at the time were the same for when both booked the appointment, I could visit a girl, comment yes it's her, next week she puts up fake images, guy says it's not her and fake photo report submitted, am I to blame or the lady for switching?

good point Anon, obviously not too sure exactly how the backend of this site works (a lot of the time it doesn't ), but maybe E-I time stamps their images, that way only the reviews that say the fake pics are defo the girl would get ratted

[samlad]

good point Anon, obviously not too sure exactly how the backend of this site works (a lot of the time it doesn't ), but maybe E-I time stamps their images, that way only the reviews that say the fake pics are defo the girl would get ratted

A little harsh considering the review mods process over 300 reviews a week on top of dealing with numerous reported reviews on a daily basis. I think it's more a case of the things that do work get over-shadowed by the few (yes, few in relation to everything!) that people complain about.

[sweety]

about the raport fake pictures:i think that is great
but fake review no,because if some persone want too do something bad to an escort,he just put 3 ,4,10 fake reviews and that´s all.

[monster_monster]

A little harsh considering the review mods process over 300 reviews a week on top of dealing with numerous reported reviews on a daily basis. I think it's more a case of the things that do work get over-shadowed by the few (yes, few in relation to everything!) that people complain about.

I'm not talking about the work the mods do, I was referring to how this site has gotten so slow and seems to die every so often. In nerd speak the back-end is "The back-end comprises the organization and efficiency of the source code, invisible scripted functions, and the server-side components that process the output from the front-end."