Bannings, some clarity ?

[dave1dave]

I know there are various reasons why the site will ban people, and various reasons why it is not keen on divulging to many of its methods of detection.

But as a forum, the members should have some way of knowing for sure that a ban is justified or necessary. Even just to assure members that E-I is not just banning people to placate a select few, as has been inferred on occasion.

So what I suggest is the forum members pick one or two members that we feel are un-biased and fair minded.
Who could be given the relevant information on a banning, under strict confidentiality.
They can then come back to the community with a verification of the banning on behalf of the community.

Sort of community representatives.

[samlad]

I know there are various reasons why the site will ban people, and various reasons why it is not keen on divulging to many of its methods of detection.

But as a forum, the members should have some way of knowing for sure that a ban is justified or necessary. Even just to assure members that E-I is not just banning people to placate a select few, as has been inferred on occasion.

So what I suggest is the forum members pick one or two members that we feel are un-biased and fair minded.
Who could be given the relevant information on a banning, under strict confidentiality.
They can then come back to the community with a verification of the banning on behalf of the community.

Sort of community representatives.

I'm afraid Dave, as I've said many, many times before, it is not always appropriate to disclose this information. For those who know some of the details of this particular incident (HL/Poggo/Rachel, etc.) you can probably understand. We cannot make a democracy of this I'm afraid.

[Banjo]

Just gotta say that I for one am fed up to the back teeth reading about bannings, warnings and so forth. For me this forum is about relaxing, blowing off a bit of steam of an evening in an unhibited way and having some adult contact of an adult nature. This banning business is a bloody farce at this stage.

I'm pointing fingers at nobody. There are rules on here which are broken and they lead to all this crap. Maybe the rules are ridiculous .... and maybe some users just take the piss for the sake of it. It's a combination of both. But FFS, it's taking all the pleasure out of visiting this forum and I'm fed up with the lotta ya.

[Quarterpoundher]

I know there are various reasons why the site will ban people, and various reasons why it is not keen on divulging to many of its methods of detection.

But as a forum, the members should have some way of knowing for sure that a ban is justified or necessary. Even just to assure members that E-I is not just banning people to placate a select few, as has been inferred on occasion.

So what I suggest is the forum members pick one or two members that we feel are un-biased and fair minded.
Who could be given the relevant information on a banning, under strict confidentiality.
They can then come back to the community with a verification of the banning on behalf of the community.

Sort of community representatives.

Perfectly valid bans, escorts got off very lightly actually, their feet from the advertising section would not touch ground if I owned the gaff.

[dave1dave]

Perfectly valid bans, escorts got off very lightly actually, their feet from the advertising section would not touch ground if I owned the gaff.

Hey QPH !

I assume you are privy to all information.

[samlad]

Hey QPH !

I assume you are privy to all information.

Quarterpoundher has helped us with some of our investigation, so thank you.

[An don]

Perfectly valid bans, escorts got off very lightly actually, their feet from the advertising section would not touch ground if I owned the gaff.

And me with you . Do you want raid piggy banks and make an offer lol

[Quarterpoundher]

And me with you . Do you want raid piggy banks and make an offer lol

I might just about afford the - on the door.

[dave1dave]

Quarterpoundher has helped us with some of our investigation, so thank you.

This is a perfect example of what I meant in the original post.

As a third party verification, who is not working for the site.

[City Gent]

Dave when you have clarified WTF is going on can you tip me the wink mate


CG