Advertising

[samlad]

It looks like "thou shall not criticise what makes money"

On the contrary, it's the payting advertisers that have shaped the site the way it is.

[Lucy Chambers]

The new systems are impemented through the requests of the escorts, so perhaps this should be addressed in the private escort forum then?

I havent bothered addressing it in private because I dont really care. However I do read general and this has been an issue since the changes were put into effect, and can I just point out that no one actually requested the changes that happened, they asked for the option to add one or two days, not pay a premium to be on the front page everyday

[lcilis26]

Well, lets hope it works that way and doesnt actually mean that clients stop looking in the new and back section when they figure out there are little there that are new or back for that matter

I think a lot of clients have already figured out that it is mostly agency type girls appear there now Lucy.

[samlad]

It is pertinent to clients as well. Why can't it be debated out in the open?

I'm not saying it can't but on this occasion it was said that the system had a glitch, I looked into it and realised there wasn't one. The post was deleted so that things would not be misconstrued. I have however made a point to the technical team regarding this particular issue.

[lcilis26]

On the contrary, it's the payting advertisers that have shaped the site the way it is.

And where do these paying advertisers get their money from? I'm sure they woul like to keep their Customers happy.

[anon361]

On the contrary, it's the payting advertisers that have shaped the site the way it is.

I'd be more inclined to think it's the agencies that have shaped the site this way behind the scenes through their ladies to once again get one over on true independents that have to pay even more than them now

[lcilis26]

I'm not saying it can't but on this occasion it was said that the system had a glitch, I looked into it and realised there wasn't one. The post was deleted so that things would not be misconstrued. I have however made a point to the technical team regarding this particular issue.

But the system does have a glitch. A section called "New or Back" does not contain those who are New or Back but girls who are there because they meet some other criteria. How are we supposed to see who is "New or Back" now?

[jessie]

Aaaah no no no.
Put the blame on us now. We didn't ask for this and it has been discussed now in private for ages and we are still discussing.
So samlad don't let the people think now it's our fault as yes we ask for one thing but we are saying already for a long time that
E-I has to put limits on the abuse.

Jessie

On the contrary, it's the payting advertisers that have shaped the site the way it is.

[ber]

I am looking at this from a clients perspective, there is a section called new or back which i take to mean new girls arriving or
girls back after a break, not girls already touring. So we are being duped. It appears girls are paying daily rates to manipulate the system. I have no problem a girl paying extra advertising if she wants a higher profile but then have a seperate section for the
people paying the elite rates not discriminate against the girls who are genuinelly new or back because they are bumped off the
page much more quickly

[samlad]

But the system does have a glitch. A section called "New or Back" does not contain those who are New or Back but girls who are there because they meet some other criteria. How are we supposed to see who is "New or Back" now?

Like I say, this has been brought to the attention of the technical team so they can take a look at it.