Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 54

Thread: question about reporting fakes

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    31,568

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anon361 View Post
    Before I start Thanks googleplex for your efforts, this rant has nothing to do with you personally but it's an absolute joke

    I submitted a fake photo report on THIS LADY over a week ago, I personally met and reviewed her, I pointed out at the time that the images were not her, she then put up genuine ones which I was happy with but if you read the comments I added to my review you can see she changed them occasionally to fakes. When I submitted the report I pointed out they were not her again, I couldn't show a link to where she got the fakes but I pointed out the thumbnails on the 2 subsequent reviews after mine and they were of the girl I met and clearly you can see while similar they were not the same lady. The images she has on her profile today are different again and yet still not the lady I met but amazingly these ones are marked verified.
    My report was rejected and I was informed probably it's a different lady using her profile and would I like my review removed, it's a joke and crazy and really i'm getting very pissed off with this sites attitude, I think it's time I move house...
    Sorry you feel this way Anon. We had to monitor her activity over a few days before we could take action. Although it's not a case of not believing you, when we have just removed pictures in the past, the escorts had challenged us to prove the reports are genuine and we did not have the means to do so, hence the reason we really need links. The new tactic is to try and rotate pictures to throw us off guard, however we are taking screen shots and building portfolios of these escorts, hence the reason this one was taken down.

    However, you will see that Sonia does not actually have any pictures up as she is on a 30 day ban:

    Sonia, Dublin Female Independent Escort, profile on Escort Ireland

    I am truely sorry you feel undermined, but I hope this clarifies things.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    276

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anon361 View Post
    I couldn't show a link to where she got the fakes
    shes got the same number as one I reported as fake so probably from same london site I found the fakes, Kittys ones now have that look that a lot of certain london sites go for.

    Vanessa, Dublin Female Independent Escort, profile on Escort Ireland

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    16,753
    Reviews
    57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thehighwayman View Post
    Anon I think you would be better leaving a cooment on your review so others will know.
    My point is it's good enough to show the pictures are different to the last set she used that were reported fake but it's not good enough for a guy with a good history with this site who has met her saying it's not her along with pointing out the images held on this site as thumbnails on other reviews show it's not her yet E-I are happy with the knowledge that it's probably a different girl using the profile so that's why the images now are OK.. like i said a joke..

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    31,568

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anon361 View Post
    My point is it's good enough to show the pictures are different to the last set she used that were reported fake but it's not good enough for a guy with a good history with this site who has met her saying it's not her along with pointing out the images held on this site as thumbnails on other reviews show it's not her yet E-I are happy with the knowledge that it's probably a different girl using the profile so that's why the images now are OK.. like i said a joke..
    Unfortunately it becomes a legal issue if we cannot justify the removal of the photos, hence the reason we need to be diligent about things.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    16,753
    Reviews
    57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by samlad View Post
    Unfortunately it becomes a legal issue if we cannot justify the removal of the photos, hence the reason we need to be diligent about things.
    So have you got one of those screen shots from when I reported her images as fakes a week or so ago because the verified images she had back then are different again to the verified images she has up now

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    31,568

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anon361 View Post
    So have you got one of those screen shots from when I reported her images as fakes a week or so ago because the verified images she had back then are different again to the verified images she has up now
    To be honest, no. We started doing this a couple of weeks ago to prevent this kind of thing from happening.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    16,753
    Reviews
    57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by samlad View Post
    Unfortunately it becomes a legal issue if we cannot justify the removal of the photos, hence the reason we need to be diligent about things.
    That's bull Samand you know it, E-I are the ones reponsible to ensure what they advertise is accurate to the best of their knowledge and are within their rights to question aspects they feel are not right so when a client tells you the images are wrong they should be taken down and checked.. I appreciatte you cannot do this for every unknown member but I would think someone with a good history would deserve the benefit of the doubt and his complaints would be taken seriously and investigated..

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    31,568

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anon361 View Post
    That's bull Samand you know it, E-I are the ones reponsible to ensure what they advertise is accurate to the best of their knowledge and are within their rights to question aspects they feel are not right so when a client tells you the images are wrong they should be taken down and checked.. I appreciatte you cannot do this for every unknown member but I would think someone with a good history would deserve the benefit of the doubt and his complaints would be taken seriously and investigated..
    It's not bull, as we decided to take this approach as a result of the very same type of incident.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    16,753
    Reviews
    57

    Default

    Like I said sam, I just had a look and the report was rejected on the 11th of this month so obviously what your saying isn't completely true or inst being done very well...

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    31,568

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anon361 View Post
    Like I said sam, I just had a look and the report was rejected on the 11th of this month so obviously what your saying isn't completely true or inst being done very well...
    We simply didn't have enough activity Anon. That's all. You will find future issues should not be such issues.

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •