I see where you're coming from Peter. I hate slating anyone especially ladies. However, for the review system to work, it has to include bad experiences. There is always a diplomatic way of writing the review. I think giving objective reasons why an encounter was disappointing or bad, would be the appropriate thing to do rather than just not reviewing at all. There is a cringe factor involved here, but I think a balanced review system is necessary for escorts, clients and the industry in general.
Originally Posted by petethedub
This in no way justifies a client using the review system to be nasty to an escort. That is completely unacceptable. Even in a bad review, one can be objective and kind while not hiding the truth.
I also use the 'satisfaction' sections fairly discriminatingly. This is useful for distiguishing 'good' from 'great encounters'. I tend to be fairly stringent in this section and there are only a few ladies that I've given "very satisfied" in all categories. This isn't because I wasn't happy or satisfied with those encounters but is there to distinguish the 'good experiences' from the 'unbelievable ones'. I think the same can apply when rating bad experiences (although this would be less important once the overall experience was bad)
"Don't be reckless with other people’s hearts. Don't put up with people who are reckless with yours"