Mary City West fake photo report ignored

[samlad]

Isnt the best evidence the client saying it isnt the lady? I was told that was why N/A reviews had to exist, so that clients can say it isnt the one in the pictures.

Not really. You'd be surprised how many bitter clients try to put an escort down because so won't provide a particular favourite.

[sharkskin]

Hi Wiggidy

Two links at the bottom of her profile. Submit review and submit fake photo report which I did.

Folks have read the line above and have understood it to mean that you submitted both a review and a fake photo report. I'm not sure. Have you submitted a review or not?

If not, then I would encourage you to submit one. You can say that you turned up and were met by a lady who was not the lady in the pics. I can see no reason why such a review will not be accepted and I think that everyone here would encourage you to do that.

I'm not sure what other proof you'd like. I'll post again when I have a gazillion posts and am part of the clique.

Unfortunately, that is how it works. If you look at the site policy for fake photo reports, you will see that until you are better known, fake photo reports will only be accepted if they are accompanied by a link to another site on the web where the photos can be seen.

I know it seems unfair but the site admins have to get a balance between allowing clients to post warnings and protecting hard working escorts from posters who are out to harm their businesses. I am not suggesting for one moment that you fall into that category but you are a new poster and the site does have an established and published policy.

[Lucy Chambers]

Not really. You'd be surprised how many bitter clients try to put an escort down because so won't provide a particular favourite.

Oh, ok. So what is the need for NA reviews then? If no money has changed hands why should the client be able to leave an N/A, if not to say it wasnt the lady in the pictures?

[samlad]

Oh, ok. So what is the need for NA reviews then? If no money has changed hands why should the client be able to leave an N/A, if not to say it wasnt the lady in the pictures?

If we are sure that a review was for an escort that wasn't in the picture, then technically the review should be invalid as it isn't the same picture, in the instances that the pictures are verified. These reviews have been deleted as far as I'm aware. If the pictures aren't verified, it's a bit hit and miss, I know.

[El Gordo]

I've asked escorts how photo verification works. Based on what they said, I concluded that it's a complete waste of time. To be fair to E-I,
- there is no real way they could verify photos, and
- other sites also claim to, so if E-I didn't go through the charade then they would be losing out.

[sharkskin]

Oh, ok. So what is the need for NA reviews then? If no money has changed hands why should the client be able to leave an N/A, if not to say it wasnt the lady in the pictures?

Of course it is legit to post an N/A review if the photos do not match but there are other circumstances:

How about:

I turned up and rang and nobody answered the phone.

I turned up and rang and her pimp answered the door.

The room was so tiny that there was only a single bed in it and even then the door could not open the whole way as it hit the bed - plus I was only offered a shower with cold water.

All legit reasons.

[Lucy Chambers]

Of course it is legit to post an N/A review if the photos do not match but there are other circumstances:

How about:

I turned up and rang and nobody answered the phone.

I turned up and rang and her pimp answered the door.

The room was so tiny that there was only a single bed in it and even then the door could not open the whole way as it hit the bed - plus I was only offered a shower with cold water.

All legit reasons.

I see your point but those reviews still puzzle me.

If money hasn't changed hands though what right have you to comment? The review process is supposed to reflect the time you had with a lady, not the time you had with her furnishings.

I understand the need to alert people but I an unsure you should be allowed to trash someones business if you didnt actually lose money.

[sharkskin]

The review process is supposed to reflect the time you had with a lady, not the time you had with her furnishings.

I understand the need to alert people but I an unsure you should be allowed to trash someones business if you didnt actually lose money.

Those are fair points Lucy but I still think that such reviews are valid.

My comment about a tiny room and lack of hot water were about premises, not furnishings and the escort was clearly making a business decision to save money by cutting corners on the facilities while charging as much as the competition working from top quality apartments.

While I may not have lost cash, I have lost two other things that are actually more important to me than the cash:

First, I have lost my time. My last attempted punt involved a 45 minute journey there and another 45 minutes back to try to see a lady who didn't pick up the phone. Indeed, given that I had a client who was willing to pay for that hour and a half if I would have been working for him, I did lose money.

Secondly, I have lost an opportunity. My punting is always limited by the availability of opportunities not money.

[Lucy Chambers]

Those are fair points Lucy but I still think that such reviews are valid.


While I may not have lost cash, I have lost two other things that are actually more important to me than the cash:

First, I have lost my time. My last attempted punt involved a 45 minute journey there and another 45 minutes back to try to see a lady who didn't pick up the phone. Indeed, given that I had a client who was willing to pay for that hour and a half if I would have been working for him, I did lose money.

Secondly, I have lost an opportunity. My punting is always limited by the availability of opportunities not money.

Hmm. Ok. I shall concede.

Mutter mutter

[Wiggidy]

...I am not suggesting for one moment that you fall into that category but you are a new poster and the site does have an established and published policy...

I'm not actually. I've had a previous account since about 2006 but changed due to my username being too like my nickname used by my friends.

I've seen age old threads time and time again about the apparent "difficulty" in verified pics.

Digital cameras. A4 paper and black markers are within everyones reach.

A simple pic of the lady holding the paper with "Escort-Ireland" on it is the way forward...and I guarantee punters would rather see a real pic of the lady that one thats photoshopped to shit, only for them to come on here and moan that it "Looks nothing like the girl."

Not really. You'd be surprised how many bitter clients try to put an escort down because so won't provide a particular favourite.

All I can say is that I have better things to do than put people down. I'm not into any kinky stuff that people turn there noses at, and I can give you a list as long as my arm of girls that will testify to that one. So while your statement may have its truths, its not relevant in this case.
In fact the girl in question was very polite about the whole thing, but like I say, chuckled when I showed her the profile pic in question, leading me to believe the whole verified pics thing is a bit of a joke.