double standards...

**Sam Spade** · 03-02-11, 19:22

If we wish to have equality in the workplace, then the same rules must apply to each gender.
If a man is not allowed to pat a ladies bottom, then it goes that a lady should not be allowed to pat a mans.

Personally, I would love to have my bottom felt by a lady, unfortunately I have never been so lucky!

**Jasmin** · 03-02-11, 19:22

Originally Posted by warmcome

thanks for your learned reply, Jasmin. the annoyance i feel
was with the way the female panel dismissed it.

girls pat my bottom in crowded bars sometimes and sometimes
i see bottoms that i want to pat. it is the double standard that is the issue.
men and women are no longer equal before the law or society,
women have become more equal. whats good for the goose...x

Don't take this TV programs too seriously. There is a program on TV, which I can't remember the name right now, with a panel of women, that I just can't stand. Please shoot me if I have nothing better to do and have to watch it

About patting someone's botton in a bar . . . I don't do it and I don't accept it, someone doing so, can expect the same . . . on their face . . . but when that happened it was just a reflexive reaction, normally i am not into spanking

**Banjo** · 03-02-11, 19:27

Originally Posted by warmcome

men and women are no longer equal before the law or society,
women have become more equal. whats good for the goose...x

A bit "Animal Farm"'ish isn't it ?!

**warmcome** · 03-02-11, 19:28

Originally Posted by wingman

It's only wrong if she's not attractive.

no wingman. that attitude has to change.
if a good looking guy feels up a woman, unwarranted-
it's still wrong?

**Sam Spade** · 03-02-11, 19:29

Originally Posted by wingman

I know a man who gets the seven shades of shit kicked out of him by his wife on a regular basis. Before you ask, it's not me.

Don't worry, your secret is safe with us.

**lucifersam** · 03-02-11, 19:30

Sexual Harassment is about perception, an employee or employer should not act in such a fashion that those actions could be perceived as being harassment of any kind.If any person feels harassed, the damage has already been done and intention to harass is not relevant. The sex and gender of harassed or harasser is also irrelevant.

**carlos marvado** · 03-02-11, 19:30

Too much emphasis on women's rights (and maybe even men's rights in this particular case)........whatever happened to good old fashioned human rights?

**warmcome** · 03-02-11, 19:34

Originally Posted by carlos marvado

Too much emphasis on women's rights (and maybe even men's rights in this particular case)........whatever happened to good old fashioned human rights?

and human responsibilities...

**Jasmin** · 03-02-11, 19:35

Originally Posted by lucifersam

Sexual Harassment is about perception, an employee or employer should not act in such a fashion that those actions could be perceived as being harassment of any kind.If any person feels harassed, the damage has already been done and intention to harass is not relevant. The sex and gender of harassed or harasser is also irrelevant.

Tell me, did you copy and paste or it is really from you.... I loved it. I should have said it myself

**lucifersam** · 03-02-11, 19:37

Originally Posted by Jasmin

Tell me, did you copy and paste or it is really from you.... I loved it. I should have said it myself

All my own work and understanding

Thread: double standards...

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Display

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Sam Spade For This Useful Post:

The Following User Says Thank You to Sam Spade For This Useful Post:

The Following User Says Thank You to lucifersam For This Useful Post:

The Following User Says Thank You to carlos marvado For This Useful Post:

The Following User Says Thank You to lucifersam For This Useful Post:

Posting Permissions