I would have posted this in the earlier thread, but that has been locked.
First of all, thank you Nicole for ratting the reviews I linked, particularly the negative reviews of Nikol and Beatrice. But I hope this is not the end of the matter. There are definitely more fake reviewers in this group.
Consider jerryy, another of Alicia's reviewers. You can see the characteristic triple comma in review number 33259, the unusual apostrophe in review number 32559 of Alessia, and the extraneous space before punctuation in review number 32900 of Victoria and review number 33379 of Sabrina. All the characteristic features of the other fake reviews are present. So when there is a note attached to review number 32939 of Alice, saying she doesn't think her negative review is correct, surely she should be believed, right?
Or consider another of Alicia's reviewers, misterd. You have the triple comma in review number 33023 of Morena and review number 33107 of Alicia and review number 33414 of Lyi (no link, because the escort in question has just opted out of the reviews system). You have the ´ apostrophe in review number 33959 of Selina. You have the unusual spacing before punctuation in that review and review number 33643 of Mademoiselle. Is there any doubt that this is another fake reviewer, or rather another profile of the same fake reviewer? The reviews or Morena and Selina are negative. So is his review number 32647 of Julia. Someone certainly seems to be out to get Julia. The is another negative review of her, in the same style, which was ratted by VJ back in November. And is it just me that finds that n/a review fishy?
Continuing through the list of Alicia's reviewers, we get bandone. Banned one? Did this name not seem suspicious to anyone? Anyway, note the commas in review number 33642 of AndreyXL, previously known as Tiffany. You can find the unusual spaces before punctuation in review number 32744 of Yasmine, or rather you could, if she hadn't also opted out within the last few days. So when Lory ends her note attached to review number 32748 by the same author with the words "we HAVE NEVER MET", it's not difficult to understand her frustration.
Do I need to go through the reviews of endaca? Or the picture clear enough already?