Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 41

Thread: Continuation

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    In a cathouse
    Posts
    3,548
    Blog Entries
    1
    Reviews
    26

    Default Continuation

    I would have posted this in the earlier thread, but that has been locked.

    First of all, thank you Nicole for ratting the reviews I linked, particularly the negative reviews of Nikol and Beatrice. But I hope this is not the end of the matter. There are definitely more fake reviewers in this group.

    Consider jerryy, another of Alicia's reviewers. You can see the characteristic triple comma in review number 33259, the unusual apostrophe in review number 32559 of Alessia, and the extraneous space before punctuation in review number 32900 of Victoria and review number 33379 of Sabrina. All the characteristic features of the other fake reviews are present. So when there is a note attached to review number 32939 of Alice, saying she doesn't think her negative review is correct, surely she should be believed, right?

    Or consider another of Alicia's reviewers, misterd. You have the triple comma in review number 33023 of Morena and review number 33107 of Alicia and review number 33414 of Lyi (no link, because the escort in question has just opted out of the reviews system). You have the ´ apostrophe in review number 33959 of Selina. You have the unusual spacing before punctuation in that review and review number 33643 of Mademoiselle. Is there any doubt that this is another fake reviewer, or rather another profile of the same fake reviewer? The reviews or Morena and Selina are negative. So is his review number 32647 of Julia. Someone certainly seems to be out to get Julia. The is another negative review of her, in the same style, which was ratted by VJ back in November. And is it just me that finds that n/a review fishy?

    Continuing through the list of Alicia's reviewers, we get bandone. Banned one? Did this name not seem suspicious to anyone? Anyway, note the commas in review number 33642 of AndreyXL, previously known as Tiffany. You can find the unusual spaces before punctuation in review number 32744 of Yasmine, or rather you could, if she hadn't also opted out within the last few days. So when Lory ends her note attached to review number 32748 by the same author with the words "we HAVE NEVER MET", it's not difficult to understand her frustration.

    Do I need to go through the reviews of endaca? Or the picture clear enough already?
    Last edited by El Gordo; 30-01-11 at 16:04.

    “I wish you wouldn’t keep appearing and vanishing so suddenly; you make one quite giddy!”
    “All right,” said the Cat; and this time it vanished quite slowly, beginning with the end of the tail, and ending with the grin, which remained some time after the rest of it had gone.

  2. The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to El Gordo For This Useful Post:

    69patrick69 (30-01-11), Alyssa Jenkins (02-02-11), An don (30-01-11), Blond chick NIKKY (05-02-11), ChiefHandker (30-01-11), kelly curvybabe (30-01-11), hd7055 (30-01-11), hornylimerick (30-01-11), jayf1 (31-01-11), kelso (30-01-11), Lucy Chambers (30-01-11), mature abby (04-02-11), mellors (30-01-11), Rachel Divine (30-01-11), sweethomes (30-01-11), takemedrunkimhome (30-01-11)

  3. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    919
    Reviews
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by El Gordo View Post
    I would have posted this in the earlier thread, but that has been locked.

    First of all, thank you Nicole for ratting the reviews I linked, particularly the negative reviews of Nikol and Beatrice. But I hope this is not the end of the matter. There are definitely more fake reviewers in this group.

    Consider jerryy, another of Alicia's reviewers. You can see the characteristic triple comma in review number 33259, the unusual apostrophe in review number 32559 of Alessia, and the extraneous space before punctuation in review number 32900 of Victoria and review number 33379 of Sabrina. All the characteristic features of the other fake reviews are present. So when there is a note attached to review number 32939 of Alice, saying she doesn't think her negative review is correct, surely she should be believed, right?

    Or consider another of Alicia's reviewers, misterd. You have the triple comma in review number 33023 of Morena and review number 33107 of Alicia and review number 33414 of Lyi (no link, because the escort in question has just opted out of the reviews system). You have the ´ apostrophe in review number 33959 of Selina. You have the unusual spacing before punctuation in that review and review number 33643 of Mademoiselle. Is there any doubt that this is another fake reviewer, or rather another profile of the same fake reviewer? The reviews or Morena and Selina are negative. So is his review number 32647 of Julia. Someone certainly seems to be out to get Julia. The is another negative review of her, in the same style, which was ratted by VJ back in November. And is it just me that finds that n/a review fishy?

    Continuing through the list of Alicia's reviewers, we get bandone. Banned one? Did this name not seem suspicious to anyone? Anyway, note the commas in review number 33642 of AndreyXL, previously known as Tiffany. You can find the unusual spaces before punctuation in review number 32744 of Yasmine, or rather you could, if she hadn't also opted out within the last few days. So when Lory ends her note attached to review number 32748 by the same author with the words "we HAVE NEVER MET", it's not difficult to understand her frustration.

    Do I need to go through the reviews of endaca? Or the picture clear enough already?
    Fair play again Gordo, i'll do endaca for you
    Reviews of Irish escorts written by Irish escort client endaca - Escort Ireland

    Incorrect space before full stops/commas here
    Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 032650 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies
    He also uses the dodgy "thank ' s" that you mentioned yesterday.
    Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 033503 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies
    And of course there's the triple comma again:
    Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 033024 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies

  4. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to ChiefHandker For This Useful Post:

    69patrick69 (30-01-11), An don (30-01-11), El Gordo (30-01-11), hornylimerick (30-01-11), sweethomes (30-01-11), takemedrunkimhome (30-01-11)

  5. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Kerry
    Posts
    1,191
    Reviews
    132

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by El Gordo View Post
    I would have posted this in the earlier thread, but that has been locked.

    First of all, thank you Nicole for ratting the reviews I linked, particularly the negative reviews of Nikol and Beatrice. But I hope this is not the end of the matter. There are definitely more fake reviewers in this group.

    Consider jerryy, another of Alicia's reviewers. You can see the characteristic triple comma in review number 33259, the unusual apostrophe in review number 32559 of Alessia, and the extraneous space before punctuation in review number 32900 of Victoria and review number 33379 of Sabrina. All the characteristic features of the other fake reviews are present. So when there is a note attached to review number 32939 of Alice, saying she doesn't think her negative review is correct, surely she should be believed, right?

    Or consider another of Alicia's reviewers, misterd. You have the triple comma in review number 33023 of Morena and review number 33107 of Alicia and review number 33414 of Lyi (no link, because the escort in question has just opted out of the reviews system). You have the ´ apostrophe in review number 33959 of Selina. You have the unusual spacing before punctuation in that review and review number 33643 of Mademoiselle. Is there any doubt that this is another fake reviewer, or rather another profile of the same fake reviewer? The reviews or Morena and Selina are negative. So is his review number 32647 of Julia. Someone certainly seems to be out to get Julia. The is another negative review of her, in the same style, which was ratted by VJ back in November. And is it just me that finds that n/a review fishy?

    Continuing through the list of Alicia's reviewers, we get bandone. Banned one? Did this name not seem suspicious to anyone? Anyway, note the commas in review number 33642 of AndreyXL, previously known as Tiffany. You can find the unusual spaces before punctuation in review number 32744 of Yasmine, or rather you could, if she hadn't also opted out within the last few days. So when Lory ends her note attached to review number 32748 by the same author with the words "we HAVE NEVER MET", it's not difficult to understand her frustration.

    Do I need to go through the reviews of endaca? Or the picture clear enough already?
    Brilliant stuff again El Gordo. Fair play to you man, keep up the good work.

  6. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    5,354

    Default

    Again, these will be looked at and we will come back to you.

  7. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    In a cathouse
    Posts
    3,548
    Blog Entries
    1
    Reviews
    26

    Default

    Thanks, VJ.

    I should say, the idea of looking at these reviews came from An Don. He raised suspicions about tiger2011 and misterd. Without that, I wouldn't have looked further.

    “I wish you wouldn’t keep appearing and vanishing so suddenly; you make one quite giddy!”
    “All right,” said the Cat; and this time it vanished quite slowly, beginning with the end of the tail, and ending with the grin, which remained some time after the rest of it had gone.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to El Gordo For This Useful Post:

    An don (30-01-11)

  9. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    If im lucky..its with Ms Chambers
    Posts
    2,553
    Reviews
    6

    Default

    how to spell cork

    View Profile: aliciasexy - Escort Ireland Community
    and go to the about me page
    note her location is spelt corck

    know look at this review for her duo partner sophie gold
    Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 034149 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies
    note the spelling again of corck

    Perhaps a simple mistake but then when you read the post below from Darek

    https://www.escort-ireland.com/board...tml#post375739

    You will see the apostrophe and the ,,,

    All very strange
    Last edited by An don; 30-01-11 at 19:17.

  10. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to An don For This Useful Post:

    69patrick69 (30-01-11), Blond chick NIKKY (05-02-11), hornylimerick (30-01-11)

  11. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    1,139
    Reviews
    33

    Default

    very suspect

  12. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Pat Cave always and forever.
    Posts
    13,343

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by El Gordo View Post
    I would have posted this in the earlier thread, but that has been locked.

    First of all, thank you Nicole for ratting the reviews I linked, particularly the negative reviews of Nikol and Beatrice. But I hope this is not the end of the matter. There are definitely more fake reviewers in this group.

    Consider jerryy, another of Alicia's reviewers. You can see the characteristic triple comma in review number 33259, the unusual apostrophe in review number 32559 of Alessia, and the extraneous space before punctuation in review number 32900 of Victoria and review number 33379 of Sabrina. All the characteristic features of the other fake reviews are present. So when there is a note attached to review number 32939 of Alice, saying she doesn't think her negative review is correct, surely she should be believed, right?

    Or consider another of Alicia's reviewers, misterd. You have the triple comma in review number 33023 of Morena and review number 33107 of Alicia and review number 33414 of Lyi (no link, because the escort in question has just opted out of the reviews system). You have the ´ apostrophe in review number 33959 of Selina. You have the unusual spacing before punctuation in that review and review number 33643 of Mademoiselle. Is there any doubt that this is another fake reviewer, or rather another profile of the same fake reviewer? The reviews or Morena and Selina are negative. So is his review number 32647 of Julia. Someone certainly seems to be out to get Julia. The is another negative review of her, in the same style, which was ratted by VJ back in November. And is it just me that finds that n/a review fishy?

    Continuing through the list of Alicia's reviewers, we get bandone. Banned one? Did this name not seem suspicious to anyone? Anyway, note the commas in review number 33642 of AndreyXL, previously known as Tiffany. You can find the unusual spaces before punctuation in review number 32744 of Yasmine, or rather you could, if she hadn't also opted out within the last few days. So when Lory ends her note attached to review number 32748 by the same author with the words "we HAVE NEVER MET", it's not difficult to understand her frustration.

    Do I need to go through the reviews of endaca? Or the picture clear enough already?
    Thanks El Gordo.
    Reviews are ratted now.
    Regards
    Nicole

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to Nicole For This Useful Post:

    hd7055 (30-01-11)

  14. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Pat Cave always and forever.
    Posts
    13,343

  15. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,419
    Reviews
    51

    Default

    excellent work El Gordo!!!

Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •