Brand New Trusted Reviewer Criteria for 2011

[JAMESCORK]

I really don’t know why I take such interest in this as I am a TR already, and by all accounts enjoy special treatment from all the escorts I meet, so why do I want to dilute my coveted privileges you may ask. Because there are no special privileges if the badge is given to the correct candidates. I want more TRs to make MY life easier whilst escort hunting. Selfish I know, but I think my selfishness will help others too. I will give this one last shot then I’m done.

Firstly to address each point singularly:

1. Badges will be awarded during the Year. In order to avoid public embarassment members should only Apply by PM and not post their intentions.

(There are 2 r in embarrassment …lol… sorry but if I didn’t mention it CG is right behind me). You are saving no embarrassment here because if a guy is awarded his badge will all know he went through the stringent process of application any way.

2. Your profile should preferably although not necessarily be 2 years registered and contain 10 reviews. This is not a requirement but is prefered. What is a requirement is that applicants should at least have 3 written Escort references which will be checked by E-I Mods/Staff.

2 years registered will eliminate the majority of good active reviewers currently reviewing. Most reviewers are most active in their first two years, find regular ladies and slow down in reviewing. 10 reviews is more in keeping. The 3 written references: I presume it is meant that the escorts must PM, you the reviewer, a reference and you forward that to Staff. Ok I can live with this, but must of the types I visit do not use the internet while touring, I suppose I must therefore choose 3 that do, that wont kill me.

3. Any new proposed TR must be actively posting. This is to ensure that they are answerable to forum. If a member decides to take a break or cut back on his posts this would be acceptable. If they are gone from the forum and have stopped reviewing for 6 months or more they can become Legend instead of being be-badged.

Rubbish. This is possibly taken from our earnest and detail request to automatically allocate badges to bring up numbers immediately. A good reviewer like Victor Mature who does not post here should not be penalised.

4. Any TR abusing his TR position and looking for discount/freebe in exchange for good review or indeed any TR acting troll-like should loose his badge although it must be proved to a satisfactory level for the Mods/Managers inorder to decide.

This is a highly dangerous one especially taking into consideration current trends. The circumstance whereby a TR loses his badge must be clearly laid out and it must be only in the most severe of circumstances. Left vague, if I was to piss off Samlad and call him a tosser in a heated moment, and I loose my badge, over 40 escorts also lose their endorsement. This is detrimental to a girl’s career. Serious thought required here.

5. You should have a good and honest character represented by posts, blogs, interviews, and any other contributions to the E-I community forums. Any negative or undesirable character will not be awarded a badge.

Again needs to be finely defined as to what are the levels of undesirability. IMO a guy could be a joker or a prankster and still get my trust when it comes to reviews. The individual would want to be a right wanker before he is refused. I found it to be a joke that Dannyboy was refused. This is taking it to ridiculous levels. If you guys think he is not eligible there are at least 3 of his visited escorts actively posting here. If after consulting with them he is deemed unsuitably then fine. Remember it’s the suitability to be a TR not suitability to be one of your buddies.

6. A panel of three Moderators will approve/disapprove the applicants by vote after viewing the applicants history and references. If even one Mod member disapproves of an applicant then the member is rejected. They may apply again/appeal the decision.

Again personality clashes could deny a good trusted reviewer his badge. The panel would have to be totally impartial and open-minded. But having said that, it is us the punters that will be using his trustee status, not you the mods, so if there is a question over suitability, maybe it should be thrown open to the established members to vote rather than the mods.


But in essence I think you guys (Mngrs/mods) have not quite understood our initial request and I hope I speak for all here when I say this. We were actually looking for a quick hike in TR numbers to automatically award TR badges using our criteria put forward. It was not designed to fine tune the existing criteria which I had considered to be fine and would work fine to continue to award badges after this automatic handout was completed. We are more talking about like what NBT did when I got my badge. An overnight award of 20, 30, whatever badges to the guys here that we know and trust.

K. That’s me done. I will crusade no more on this.

[Ric Hardgear]

I really don’t know why I take such interest in this as I am a TR already, and by all accounts enjoy special treatment from all the escorts I meet, so why do I want to dilute my coveted privileges you may ask. Because there are no special privileges if the badge is given to the correct candidates. I want more TRs to make MY life easier whilst escort hunting. Selfish I know, but I think my selfishness will help others too. I will give this one last shot then I’m done.

Firstly to address each point singularly:



(There are 2 r in embarrassment …lol… sorry but if I didn’t mention it CG is right behind me). You are saving no embarrassment here because if a guy is awarded his badge will all know he went through the stringent process of application any way.




2 years registered will eliminate the majority of good active reviewers currently reviewing. Most reviewers are most active in their first two years, find regular ladies and slow down in reviewing. 10 reviews is more in keeping. The 3 written references: I presume it is meant that the escorts must PM, you the reviewer, a reference and you forward that to Staff. Ok I can live with this, but must of the types I visit do not use the internet while touring, I suppose I must therefore choose 3 that do, that wont kill me.



Rubbish. This is possibly taken from our earnest and detail request to automatically allocate badges to bring up numbers immediately. A good reviewer like Victor Mature who does not post here should not be penalised.



This is a highly dangerous one especially taking into consideration current trends. The circumstance whereby a TR loses his badge must be clearly laid out and it must be only in the most severe of circumstances. Left vague, if I was to piss off Samlad and call him a tosser in a heated moment, and I loose my badge, over 40 escorts also lose their endorsement. This is detrimental to a girl’s career. Serious thought required here.



Again needs to be finely defined as to what are the levels of undesirability. IMO a guy could be a joker or a prankster and still get my trust when it comes to reviews. The individual would want to be a right wanker before he is refused. I found it to be a joke that Dannyboy was refused. This is taking it to ridiculous levels. If you guys think he is not eligible there are at least 3 of his visited escorts actively posting here. If after consulting with them he is deemed unsuitably then fine. Remember it’s the suitability to be a TR not suitability to be one of your buddies.



Again personality clashes could deny a good trusted reviewer his badge. The panel would have to be totally impartial and open-minded. But having said that, it is us the punters that will be using his trustee status, not you the mods, so if there is a question over suitability, maybe it should be thrown open to the established members to vote rather than the mods.


But in essence I think you guys (Mngrs/mods) have not quite understood our initial request and I hope I speak for all here when I say this. We were actually looking for a quick hike in TR numbers to automatically award TR badges using our criteria put forward. It was not designed to fine tune the existing criteria which I had considered to be fine and would work fine to continue to award badges after this automatic handout was completed. We are more talking about like what NBT did when I got my badge. An overnight award of 20, 30, whatever badges to the guys here that we know and trust.

K. That’s me done. I will crusade no more on this.

superb educated generous post cudos to you james ,this place is enriched by your contribution

[JAMESCORK]

superb educated generous post cudos to you james ,this place is enriched by your contribution

You are a man of taste Riclesby...lol