Brand New Trusted Reviewer Criteria for 2011

[Lucy Chambers]

Not in the least. I'm sure they didn't have much to say

Surprisingly little

[dannyboy10]

Wow, only 44 active TRs. I really had no idea there were so few. For such a big site we really need to get some more.
Just for clarity can I add that the written review that an applicant needs from three escorts is via the Pm system. You don't have to go around with pen, paper and envelopes !

There are a few of the 44 that I would not trust to review an episode of Eastenders!
A cull is required before recruitment methinks!

[Sensual Delights]

I think it should be by private poll.

Stick there name up, and let the forum decide if they trust them or not.

Kinda similar with my own idea. "Being trusted by whom?" is the question.

Many times, decent guys will apply for the badge, so Ric and Highwayman will not be far from the truth with their approvals. However, they will have a very small percentage of what "trusted" means from the big majority.

[releasetherat]

I think it should be by private poll.

Stick there name up, and let the forum decide if they trust them or not.

problem being everyone with multiple aliases votes for thereself or buddy

[Lucy Chambers]

problem being everyone with multiple aliases votes for thereself or buddy

Yup, but its a private poll to the forum but EI can see the results of who voted. They can only count the votes from established members. If I client asks for a reference the escort would hardly say no, so that is voting for a buddy in effect.

[dannyboy10]

Not in the least. I'm sure they didn't have much to say

Truth be told the opposite is what scuppered me!
Nicole was very tired when she reviewd the application and started to read Lucys review!
Well you know how she goes on and on YAK YAK YAK! (in person, in a very loud voice).
So Nicole decided that rather than read 6 pages of rambling she dropped the black ball and went home early!

True story!!

[Sensual Delights]

problem being everyone with multiple aliases votes for thereself or buddy

There is a small risk, yes. But how many alias do you think people got here? And what's stopping the others that don't agree to have also multiple aliases ?

The chance for this to affect a pool is quite low.

And if someone deems it a little higher then my opinion, then it can be an open poll with visible username voting. The aliases we are aware will be spotted easily then. And if we are not aware of them, tough luck for us, it wouldn't bother us anyway.

[releasetherat]

Yup, but its a private poll to the forum but EI can see the results of who voted. They can only count the votes from established members. If I client asks for a reference the escort would hardly say no, so that is voting for a buddy in effect.

many established client have other usernames there needs to be transparancy and a private poll which only ei can adjudicate is not transparent.

[Lucy Chambers]

Truth be told the opposite is what scuppered me!
Nicole was very tired when she reviewd the application and started to read Lucys review!
Well you know how she goes on and on YAK YAK YAK! (in person, in a very loud voice).
So Nicole decided that rather than read 6 pages of rambling she dropped the black ball and went home early!

True story!!

Yup, it went like this..

Nicole, sweetie, I hate to have to tell you this but I have only just unclamped DannyBoy10 from my leg. Its my fear, allowed loose with a reviewers badge..

And so on

[Sman]

Not interested sorry, especially if I have to post a lot to qualify.

Its up to the reader to use their intelligence to judge whether a review is dependable or not. Best guide for me is if the reviewer has reviewed an escort that you have previously met and it is in line with your experience. Not much use for the first timer but works for me.

Still, best of luck.

S.