Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 27 of 27

Thread: Why is a banned user here allowed

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2,552
    Reviews
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lucy chambers View Post
    Okie dokes. Everyone chill, its late and there is no need to fall out over nothing. Bed, young man
    Agreed babe , I guess some care about out Scottish escort cousins more than others . LOL

    Will you take me to bed and promise you wont fake it lol
    Last edited by An don; 20-01-11 at 02:13.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    5,353

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by An don View Post
    Agreed babe , I guess some care about out Scottish escort cousins more than others . LOL
    You have been warned more than once Andon. Stop making these allegations that we dont care. That is absolutely not true.

  3. #23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by An don View Post
    Agreed babe , I guess some care about out Scottish escort cousins more than others . LOL
    Believe me sweets, those Scottish escorts aren't daft. Come on, I will send you a naughty PM to help you sleep.
    If life gives you lemons ask for Tequila

    Only sad bastards seek gratification from signatures

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2,552
    Reviews
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lucy chambers View Post
    Believe me sweets, those Scottish escorts aren't daft. Come on, I will send you a naughty PM to help you sleep.
    Thx babe , is it extra naughty

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    21,994
    Reviews
    113

    Default

    Hi Donna... Thanks for popping in... And popping out. Lol.

    An interesting comment made leads me to ask for clarification.

    "As has been said to other posters who have brought up this issue with Maxi, the situation was dealt with as per the escort asked. Why others have to jump on the bandwagon when it is none of their concern, really is not acceptable. This will only end up in yourself potentially getting banned if you continue to cause this trouble on the boards."

    Can I therefore take it that communication with the victimised escort actually occurred and that EI have accepted that distress was caused and subsequently banned Maxi as a result. I also know that this ban was not handed out without considerable managerial debate and it was deemed that one month is suitable. Can we take it that a scale of ban lengths has been drawn up to cover escorts being assaulted etc...

    Causing undue distress = 1 month. ....pffff

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to JAMESCORK For This Useful Post:

    An don (20-01-11)

  7. #26
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    2,965
    Reviews
    6

    Default

    I raised the issue myself yesterday. I was informed by a manager that the matter in relation to Maxi is being looked at, and, that it would be better if there was no more comment on the matter until the issue has been resolved.
    In fairness to all involved I will make no more comment until there is a resolution, except to say, that there is a strong feeling among many, that a person who behaves in the way alleged, has, no place chatting on the boards with the majority of guys that treat the Ladies here with respect!
    However I do believe that the general premise of EI/ES banning being cross jurisdictional is a topic worthy of debate.
    To say it is a separate site is true, but when it started there was a lot of effort made by the managers for us to pop over to it and try to kick start it! Therefore I believe it perfectly reasonable for the issues raised in a general way are valid!

  8. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dannyboy10 For This Useful Post:

    An don (20-01-11), jayf1 (20-01-11)

  9. #27
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    31,568

    Default

    Okay all,

    I have already had private conversations with several of you regarding this situation, and have explained the reasons why this user was allowed access to the other sites. For those of you I have corresponded with, you will understand why I will not make a public affair of this, but for a number of reasons (none of which are peer-pressure related by any means), I have banned this user from the other sites.

    Escort safety is our priority, regardless of whatever rumours or personal opinions some posters may have in relation to our approach to this. What we are finding increasingly frustrating is that some posters decide to start a thread on some 'moral crusade' to try and 'oust the demons', and more than likely we are trying to deal with a delicate matter behind the scenes without creating a public issue about it.

    On several occasions these threads have done more harm than good in relation to escort safety, but when we try to dampen the issue, we are accused of playing 'hush-hush' and trying to bury the 'facts'. We have also had a number of people arguing the toss by saying that they know more than we do, which let's face it, doesn't really help matters if these things are not reported to one of the moderators or managers in the first place.

    Please don't regard this as a rant of principal... quite the opposite really! Please do think about what you post. If you think that you may have some information (no matter how trivial) regarding an escort's safety, please, please report this first before deciding to make a public issue of it. The last thing we need is to get into a trivial argument over such issues when all we are trying to do is resolve them!

    I am closing this thread now, as for obvious reasons, we cannot go into any more details.

  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to samlad For This Useful Post:

    dannyboy10 (20-01-11), Lucy Chambers (20-01-11)

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •