just a question...
I am comfusserd.... ;-)
I was reading another thread and there is something I don't understand....
Somebody complained about a review being deleted and the reviewer's review of her friend (also negative) being left up on the system.
Surely in the interest of fairness if one review from a punter is removed then his other reviews should be at least put under review?
The complainant was a third party at best but the review she was complaining about was of her best mate... Having read the locked thread, I feel that it is only the girl's lack of written english that stopped her making her argument...
While I agree that the management cannot enter into discussion about third party reviews, I feel that this instance might have been dealt with a bit better?
Just my view