Originally Posted by
sharkskin
I'd like to throw an alternative view into the ring here. I don't say that this is definitive but - here goes.
He has reviews for ladies in many different locations. Yes, that looks dodgy but note also that his reviews are submitted a few days after the fact. That is not unreasonable and, if you are reviewing a touring escort, then by the time that you submit, she may well have moved elsewhere.
In Ireland I have only ever punted in Dub but, some of my reviews show other locations because the ladies have moved about. Even if you are quick off the mark, you cannot always get that right. The lady may move on the next day and if you see her late in the evening, what can you do?
Another matter is that he has posted a positive review for lina baby. Now there is an escort with a shed load of good reviews - where is the motive for somebody to write a fake positive review?
That review was ratted for a partial copy. Two phrases in the review are also in the other review. But the original review has some rather odd use of space characters around the punctuation and that is not present in the copy. It looks more to me as if bennyguy, had read the earlier review and some phrases had stuck in his mind.
Then I look at the guy's other ratted review. Ratted for another partial copy of four words only. Please, do not hold my reviews up to such a standard. Four words looks like a coincidence.
I do not claim that what I say is proof but I think that some of you guys are being a little hard on him.