Eva "Review"

[Hal]

I'm confuesd... It'sd toying with danger to leave a voice mail for an escort. but safe to text her and expect a text back!?

Girls do state v. clearly that they don't take text messages... My phone doesn't even accept them, so if a client gets the hump about a lack of response to a text when the girl has made it clear she won'r respond, more fool him!

I disagree.

so if a client gets the hump about a lack of response to a text when the girl has made it clear she won'r respond, more fool him!

Um, no. "more fool for her" because she'll get bad reviews. Phone Nazis posing as escorts get no attention (or my hard earned money)

If you're looking for equality then maybe you should pick a more pro-feminist line of work?

I'm confuesd... It'sd toying with danger to leave a voice mail for an escort. but safe to text her and expect a text back!?

Yes, because when we leave a voice mail we are giving up anonymity... anyone could know what we sound like, it could be a trap... you've already sacrificed that anonymity by posting authentic photos of yourself smiling and holding your breasts.

On one occasion, I am embarrassed to say, I left a voice mail and a MAN called me back and repeated back to me my phone number. The escort didn't even take enough care to change the default pin. So, no... I don't leave voice mails.

[Appoline]

1. On what grounds do you disagree, then?
A woman clearly explains her working practice for enquiries/ appointments.
A 'client' disrespects that, and then gets the ass ache because she did not, even in light of her clearly stated rules, pander to his ignorance?

2. So a girl says 'no texts' and does not answer her phone within two hours, nor respond to a text... Hence a poor review.
So essentially, you feel that the review at the root of this post, was ok then? That being the case, while other girls and even clients say 'anyone in their right mind would simply disregard a review like that' and yet you, would not, backs up my point about escorts opting out of the review system on a site which endorses the presence of reviews of that type.

I am unsure what exactly you imply by 'phone Nazi's posing as escorts' surely a woman who is not an escort, gains nothing by listing a phone number claiming to be such, unless of course, it is a premium rate number... and if it were so, i'm sure you'd realize before calling?
And "If you're looking for equality then maybe you should pick a more pro-feminist line of work?" I am again unsure as to your meaning here.
At first, I must assume you mean that basically, in your opinion, a girl working as an escort, has no rights, no say, no boundaries, and no control? So that saying 'I do not do this/ that' is simply there to be belittled, and abused by a 'client' should he want that thing?
If that is indeed what you meant, then that speaks for itself. If not, then please clarify.
I am in a lot of ways a feminist, and have no problems reconciling that with my escorting work, taking as I do, the clients that suit me, at the time that suits me, from the offers that suit me, and for the reaasons that suit me, and I always maintaining my right to equality, and essentially control in that role. Perhaps other women are different, I don't know.

3. Personally, I am not particularly anonymous about what I do, in so much as I cheerfully post my face and other body parts on the web, my friends, parents, and significant people all know what I do... However, I respect the discretionary aspect of my job, and that clients likely do not wish the same exposure.
But legally/ logistically, the sending phone/ number of a text message can be proved, while 'oh you sound like my dad/ husband/ boss,' is pure conjecture.

I respect your right not to leave a voice message, and can fully understand why it pissed you off that a man phoned you back... but I also fail to see why having a girl reply to a text is any less damning... If a girl sends you a text, it is forever in your phone until such a time as you, or, God forbid, your wife/ girlfriend picks up your phone, sees it and reads/ deletes it...

[mailman]

Its a non-issue at this stage as the review was out of order. Its abuse of the review system which results in girls not using it.

Next topic.

[Appoline]

/\ That was exactly my point, however some guys seem to think it was a perfectly reasonable review.

[Hal]

1. On what grounds do you disagree, then?
A woman clearly explains her working practice for enquiries/ appointments.
A 'client' disrespects that, and then gets the ass ache because she did not, even in light of her clearly stated rules, pander to his ignorance?

2. So a girl says 'no texts' and does not answer her phone within two hours, nor respond to a text... Hence a poor review.
So essentially, you feel that the review at the root of this post, was ok then? That being the case, while other girls and even clients say 'anyone in their right mind would simply disregard a review like that' and yet you, would not, backs up my point about escorts opting out of the review system on a site which endorses the presence of reviews of that type.

I am unsure what exactly you imply by 'phone Nazi's posing as escorts' surely a woman who is not an escort, gains nothing by listing a phone number claiming to be such, unless of course, it is a premium rate number... and if it were so, i'm sure you'd realize before calling?
And "If you're looking for equality then maybe you should pick a more pro-feminist line of work?" I am again unsure as to your meaning here.
At first, I must assume you mean that basically, in your opinion, a girl working as an escort, has no rights, no say, no boundaries, and no control? So that saying 'I do not do this/ that' is simply there to be belittled, and abused by a 'client' should he want that thing?
If that is indeed what you meant, then that speaks for itself. If not, then please clarify.
I am in a lot of ways a feminist, and have no problems reconciling that with my escorting work, taking as I do, the clients that suit me, at the time that suits me, from the offers that suit me, and for the reaasons that suit me, and I always maintaining my right to equality, and essentially control in that role. Perhaps other women are different, I don't know.

3. Personally, I am not particularly anonymous about what I do, in so much as I cheerfully post my face and other body parts on the web, my friends, parents, and significant people all know what I do... However, I respect the discretionary aspect of my job, and that clients likely do not wish the same exposure.
But legally/ logistically, the sending phone/ number of a text message can be proved, while 'oh you sound like my dad/ husband/ boss,' is pure conjecture.

I respect your right not to leave a voice message, and can fully understand why it pissed you off that a man phoned you back... but I also fail to see why having a girl reply to a text is any less damning... If a girl sends you a text, it is forever in your phone until such a time as you, or, God forbid, your wife/ girlfriend picks up your phone, sees it and reads/ deletes it...

Wow, I can smell the hyperbole on this post... that's how strong it is.

Yes, I feel a review saying "I can't get a hold of this girl" is more than legitimate. It means I won't waste my time trying to call her. If I can't get her on the phone, and others can't as well then she's obviously not worth my time... have some fucking manners and text us back; that' my view.

As per all this other shite you're talking about I couldn't be arsed to read it in it's entirety (or reply) because I only have so much of a tolerance for nonsensical bullshit.

If an escort can't pick up the phone when I call, no problem. If I text her back and she doesn't reply within a reasonable amount of time then she can fuck off; it's just rude.

I think the phrase on adverts that says "I don't respond to texts" is akin to "I am a rude bitch"

I hate escort run arounds and bullshit... and every other guy on this forum hates it as well.

If they want my business they'll spend the 5 cents and text me back with a short discreet message if they are busy.

[westside]

1. On what grounds do you disagree, then?
A woman clearly explains her working practice for enquiries/ appointments.
A 'client' disrespects that, and then gets the ass ache because she did not, even in light of her clearly stated rules, pander to his ignorance?

2. So a girl says 'no texts' and does not answer her phone within two hours, nor respond to a text... Hence a poor review.
So essentially, you feel that the review at the root of this post, was ok then? That being the case, while other girls and even clients say 'anyone in their right mind would simply disregard a review like that' and yet you, would not, backs up my point about escorts opting out of the review system on a site which endorses the presence of reviews of that type.

I am unsure what exactly you imply by 'phone Nazi's posing as escorts' surely a woman who is not an escort, gains nothing by listing a phone number claiming to be such, unless of course, it is a premium rate number... and if it were so, i'm sure you'd realize before calling?
And "If you're looking for equality then maybe you should pick a more pro-feminist line of work?" I am again unsure as to your meaning here.
At first, I must assume you mean that basically, in your opinion, a girl working as an escort, has no rights, no say, no boundaries, and no control? So that saying 'I do not do this/ that' is simply there to be belittled, and abused by a 'client' should he want that thing?
If that is indeed what you meant, then that speaks for itself. If not, then please clarify.
I am in a lot of ways a feminist, and have no problems reconciling that with my escorting work, taking as I do, the clients that suit me, at the time that suits me, from the offers that suit me, and for the reaasons that suit me, and I always maintaining my right to equality, and essentially control in that role. Perhaps other women are different, I don't know.

3. Personally, I am not particularly anonymous about what I do, in so much as I cheerfully post my face and other body parts on the web, my friends, parents, and significant people all know what I do... However, I respect the discretionary aspect of my job, and that clients likely do not wish the same exposure.
But legally/ logistically, the sending phone/ number of a text message can be proved, while 'oh you sound like my dad/ husband/ boss,' is pure conjecture.

I respect your right not to leave a voice message, and can fully understand why it pissed you off that a man phoned you back... but I also fail to see why having a girl reply to a text is any less damning... If a girl sends you a text, it is forever in your phone until such a time as you, or, God forbid, your wife/ girlfriend picks up your phone, sees it and reads/ deletes it...

Its for the good of humanity.

You like yapping,
Westside.

[Patricia]

I'm watching this thread with interest.

I know "lady didn't answer her phone to me" is not a good reason for a "bad" review, but if we say people can't post reviews to say they find a lady hard to contact, where do we draw the line then? - Can a guy post a review to say a lady made an appointment with him and then ignored his call when he arrived? Can a guy who turns up at an escort's place and decides to give it a miss due to misleading photos, messy apartment or similar write a review? Or should reviews only be from guys who have been with the escort?

Obviously to date we have been allowing people who haven't seen escorts to review them if they have some knowledge about them which would possibly be useful to someone thinking of seeing them like "These photos are of porn star XYZ" or "This lady doesn't keep her appointments" or yes, "This lady is hard to contact".

My logic is:

I'd rather not personally be judge and jury on reviews as to what is true/false valid/invalid etc unless it is very cleary false, invalid etc. I like as much freedom of speech as is possible (not moderator censorship everywhere you look!) and don't forget all escorts have the right to reply to any review if they feel it is untrue, unfair or whatever.

I also think our website users are not total idiots. If they see a review saying "lady didn't answer her phone to me" they can work out for themselves that the review is just a guy saying he couldn't get the girl one time and that hardly means the lady is a bad escort.

Keep talking though, I'm always interested in all your views

Pat x

[mailman]

These are the reviews in question

Just so everyone is up to speed on this debate.

[punterminator]

You're dead right Patricia - not answering the phone is a pain in the arse but there are so many valid reasons for it that it doesn't warrant a bad review.

I think that unless you actually set foot in the door then you can't "review" the lady. That being said however - it would be great if we could have some sort of ContactOMeter against the profile. Impossible probably - but there you go.

[Hal]

You're dead right Patricia - not answering the phone is a pain in the arse but there are so many valid reasons for it that it doesn't warrant a bad review.

I think that unless you actually set foot in the door then you can't "review" the lady. That being said however - it would be great if we could have some sort of ContactOMeter against the profile. Impossible probably - but there you go.

That's not what she said...

She said it doesn't make a her a bad escort. She did not say it didn't warrant a bad review.

Hence, It's still valuable information.