It's just odd. If this were, for example, and evangelical Christian website then I could understand trying to cover up the fact that one sees escorts. But this is an escort website.
It's just odd. If this were, for example, and evangelical Christian website then I could understand trying to cover up the fact that one sees escorts. But this is an escort website.
“I wish you wouldn’t keep appearing and vanishing so suddenly; you make one quite giddy!”
“All right,” said the Cat; and this time it vanished quite slowly, beginning with the end of the tail, and ending with the grin, which remained some time after the rest of it had gone.
An don (09-01-11), dannyboy10 (14-12-10), Lucy Chambers (14-12-10), westcorklad (14-12-10)
the thing i find odd is doozer has not responded in this lenght of time.
westcorklad (14-12-10)
i for one am glad someone does.Originally Posted by anon361
Why, I mean what's the point in saving them all
Established Member
Certified E-I Addict
In fairnass, even if they were one and the same I can see why a moderator would have a seperate profile for reviewing only, I don't see the proplem, I would even say it would be worse if they used the same profile as they would get even more slack from people claiming they are showing favouratism to ladies they have visited even if they weren't....It's just odd. If this were, for example, and evangelical Christian website then I could understand trying to cover up the fact that one sees escorts. But this is an escort website.
I have to disagree! A Moderators should be honest and upfront on the Forum! They should not have two profiles except in accordence with the rules! Two profiles should not have being awarded official status Mod and TR if they belong to one person!
I would have no problem with a mod reviewing once it is honestly done so the community can judje for themselves on the impartiality of decisions made!
Was EI aware of the two profiles? If so what is their justification for this?
Why was trusted reviewer given to a second profile and was it done with full knowledge?
Why were the reviews silently removed?
There may be valid explanations for all these questions and I would hope that there are and that we are informed of what they are!
Established Member
Certified E-I Addict
As far as I remember Doozer originally posted on the boards under the profile Doozer 121 the same as was used for reviews.
The Truth is out there.
I agree with ya, only problem I see would be if as Gordo says, at least 7 reviews have disappeared permanently - hardly seems fair on the escorts who were reviewed.
westcorklad (14-12-10)
Established Member
Certified E-I Addict
I agree, that's a seperate issue, I think moderators are genuine guys and because they are open to more scrutiny than a regular poster I have no problem in a white lie as far as a second profile for reviewing, why the need to delete them is a bit of an abuse IMO
Archived User
Certified E-I Addict
Okay, allow me to clarify the situation.
The managers have only been here for 6 months (Nicole as a manager for just over a month). Yes, Doozer has submitted reviews but has had these removed for whatever reason (personal reasons perhaps). It is not unheard of for E-I to remove reviews under extenuating circumstances, and in this case it looks like this is the situation.
No need to make such a fuss
Is it unusual for someone to be allowed two profiles??Okay, allow me to clarify the situation.
The managers have only been here for 6 months (Nicole as a manager for just over a month). Yes, Doozer has submitted reviews but has had these removed for whatever reason (personal reasons perhaps). It is not unheard of for E-I to remove reviews under extenuating circumstances, and in this case it looks like this is the situation.
No need to make such a fuss
Last edited by dannyboy10; 14-12-10 at 16:59.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote