REVIEWERS - Are Some Of Them Just BASTARDS?

[Sam Spade]

Over the past few weeks I have been reading reviews to decide which escort to make an appointment with.

Occasionally I see a negative review amongst a long line of positive ones.

Upon further investigation of this reviewer I notice he may have posted around 30-50% negative reviews of his total.
His excuse - not receiving favourites on list.

Are these reviews genuine, or are they just from an arrogant bastard who cannot connect with an escort either by personality or unable get service he wants i.e. owo due to pure hygiene etc.

Personally when I have ever visited an escort all favourites on menu has been available if required so the question is why not here.
It is because this person/persons have not washed properly and still expect full service?

I have said it before and will again now.
Would you want to suck a hairy cock still full of cheese?

I find that repellant as I am sure most escorts do.

So why do the minority of clients still spoil it for the rest of us who take pride in their hygiene.

Just think. How much would you accept in payment for such a cock?

The question here is
SHOULD THESE NEGATIVE REVIEWS STAND?

After all we can all submit a review on an escort - so why not clients.

Perhaps this would make some clients behave more properly than they have in the past.

As always respect the escorts!

Your views and comments please.