Piss taking in the review system

[JAMESCORK]

Thank you for you sugestion An Don. I will have a discussion about it with Sam and Jackie.
What is the time length would you propose??? This is just question as I would like to know whats your and other posters thoughts about this matter.

I hadn’t realized there was a policy of PMing new users on their first review. Sounds like a good idea really. I suppose it is a step towards weeding out fakes. I received a PM last night from an Escort concerning the TR thread and she expressed her frustration at the fact that so few review. We really should be encouraging reviews rather than discouraging. But I also do see the point in trying to police it better. You could ask Escorts to use the comment on review system more but then again as pointed out before not all Escorts use the internet while they tour. Tricky one….

[Nicole]

How about 4 weeks or 10 posts which ever comes sooner!

Im taking notes H Thank you.

[Nicole]

I hadn’t realized there was a policy of PMing new users on their first review. Sounds like a good idea really. I suppose it is a step towards weeding out fakes. I received a PM last night from an Escort concerning the TR thread and she expressed her frustration at the fact that so few review. We really should be encouraging reviews rather than discouraging. But I also do see the point in trying to police it better. You could ask Escorts to use the comment on review system more but then again as pointed out before not all Escorts use the internet while they tour. Tricky one….

Reviews subject is tricky James. Our review Mods do great job in contacting new reviewers. I do agree with James and think we can't turn review system in witch hunt. However I do undersand frustration with fake reviews and rats.

[Lucy Chambers]

One week would be better, maybe. And then a confirmation email sent to escort as well if poss, but the review could be put online without that if it was deemed plausible. It may also stop people leaving heat of the moment reviews.

[JAMESCORK]

One week would be better, maybe. And then a confirmation email sent to escort as well if poss, but the review could be put online without that if it was deemed plausible. It may also stop people leaving heat of the moment reviews.

That would be the email in lanuage of the escorts choice, right?

(Hee hee only taking the piss Honey... )

[herodotus]

Just on a related point, if a client leaves a review, usually negative, and then the escort says I was not in such and such a place on that date surely the review shooul be ratted and/or deleted as it is clearly not accurate.

As far as I can see this is not the case at the moment.

One week would be better, maybe. And then a confirmation email sent to escort as well if poss, but the review could be put online without that if it was deemed plausible. It may also stop people leaving heat of the moment reviews.

[JAMESCORK]

Just on a related point, if a client leaves a review, usually negative, and then the escort says I was not in such and such a place on that date surely the review shooul be ratted and/or deleted as it is clearly not accurate.

As far as I can see this is not the case at the moment.

Point taken Herodotus, but as Escorts tour you cant choose the location she was in when she is somewhere else. I sight flaw in the system.

[Lucy Chambers]

Just on a related point, if a client leaves a review, usually negative, and then the escort says I was not in such and such a place on that date surely the review shooul be ratted and/or deleted as it is clearly not accurate.

As far as I can see this is not the case at the moment.

Nor should it be. It would be too easy for a lady to say she wasnt somewhere in order to dodge the review. It is possible to cross reference the location of appointment with e-i advertising, they know where we were advertising on any given day.

[herodotus]

I agree Lucy, but EI do know where a girl was on a given day based on her ad. If it is the case that the girl was there on the given day then she is lying if she wasn't then the client is lying. Either way it would be nice for the other clients to know which is the case. As it stands I am sure it must be a mixture of the two which is of new use to anyone.

Nor should it be. It would be too easy for a lady to say she wasnt somewhere in order to dodge the review. It is possible to cross reference the location of appointment with e-i advertising, they know where we were advertising on any given day.

[An don]

This really won't stop them

As they will just register wait the time then post the fake reviews anyway

So wots the point

The point is that if 50% of them wont wait isnt is worth while to have 50% less rats. Every little idea helps to make the system better. Its not a perfect solution, its just one of many rattling around in my head.

As some one else suggested waiting for ten posts , i have to disagree with this because as Doozer suggested alot of reveiwers dont partake in the forum . And besides you can chalk up in ten posts in the likes of the "drop one " threads in a small amount of time.

As for alienating new reviewers , i honestly feel that if some registers and cant wait a set length of time to review , the system is better off without them.