Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Shouldn't both of this guys reviews have a rat on them ?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    3,916
    Blog Entries
    1
    Reviews
    33

    Default Shouldn't both of this guys reviews have a rat on them ?


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1,247
    Reviews
    14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dave1dave View Post
    Bizarre - the style of English (if you could call it a style) is completely different in the two reviews.
    The Gods are just, and of our pleasant vices
    Make instruments to plague us

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    36,558
    Blog Entries
    15
    Reviews
    53

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dave1dave View Post
    just viewed ,strange alright,grammer very different in both.; doc;
    Never mistake kindness for weakness .: doc

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dave1dave View Post
    Yes, I agree. I don't understand when a reviewer has one review ratted, why all reviews (positive and negative) by that reviewer are not also ratted. They might as well be because there's not a snowball's chance in hell that anyone would trust the unratted reviews.

  5. #5

    Default

    They have now.... (2 rats i mean)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •