Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Victoria Ferraz - 11238

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    3,898
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Victoria Ferraz - 11238

    Woop, woop!!!!

    Victoria Ferraz the first of her photos appears here after a tineye search

    I have submitted fake photo report

    Woop, woop!!!!
    Last edited by monster_monster; 09-11-10 at 00:25.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to monster_monster For This Useful Post:

    dr love (09-11-10)

  3. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    36,558
    Blog Entries
    15
    Reviews
    53

    Default

    iam nearly afraid to go look after your last fake report,feck it for the good fight for all punters ill take a peek...doc;
    Never mistake kindness for weakness .: doc

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    679
    Reviews
    13

    Default

    I also had a look and was surprised to see so many positive reviews. There was even one by Mr Fussy who said that the photos were genuine. What the hell is going on with the reviewers of this girl??

    Though I must admit that I visited another girl who I am pretty sure was not the girl in the photos though I may not have been thinking straight at the time so may not be the best judge but she was still amazing and though not the same girl was pretty damn hot. My point being that why cant reviewers say that if it is the case.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    2,427

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by monster_monster View Post
    Woop, woop!!!!

    Victoria Ferraz the first of her photos appears here after a tineye search

    I have submitted fake photo report

    Woop, woop!!!!
    Fake photo has been removed-the rest is genuine

    thank you

    Julia

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Ad Staff For This Useful Post:

    monster_monster (09-11-10)

  7. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    3,898
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by herodotus View Post
    I also had a look and was surprised to see so many positive reviews. There was even one by Mr Fussy who said that the photos were genuine. What the hell is going on with the reviewers of this girl??

    Though I must admit that I visited another girl who I am pretty sure was not the girl in the photos though I may not have been thinking straight at the time so may not be the best judge but she was still amazing and though not the same girl was pretty damn hot. My point being that why cant reviewers say that if it is the case.
    in fairness to punters that say this girl is as the photos, all they have to go by is a cracking body and huge boobs due to the face being blurred, you can't really blame someone if all that adds up.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •