What's with this Ken guy..
Has anybody read the reviews this Ken guy is getting .
Surely this is a pisstake...
So obviously a pisstake.
Someone has it in for poor "Ken" (pardon the pun....!)
glad you agree
If it is a pisstake as it so appears to be, wouldn't you think the poor guy has suffered enough. 5 different people have joined in and written reviews on him.
surely it is an abuse of this board to carry this on any longer.
How did his picture get verified?
(Same way as many of the escorts pics here I suppose)
Let me make it clear... Ken is a genuine male escort as far as we at E-I know. If we had any info to suggest he was not, his pics would not be verified for starters.
Re his reviews - These seem to split into 2 groups:
(1) Reviews from ladies who have seen a heterosexual Ken
(2) Reviews from deafboy who has seen a gay Ken
Of course something is amiss here.
My personal guess is that deafboy is taking the piss. However, I've had no requests from Ken for these reviews to be removed (maybe he thinks all publicity is good publicity?).
I also don't see that deafboy is writing these reviews with any real malice. To be totally honest, I've found them hillarious reading, not necessarily the most genuine reviews perhaps, but great erotic stories. I also think they are so ridiculous it is not likely readers will not be able to see that they are perhaps more jovial that truthful.
I don't see any big problem here. I think maybe we should all chill out and let Ken go on his merry way servicing the ladies (and gentlemen if deafboy is to be believed!) of Dublin
Last edited by Patricia; 25-05-07 at 23:39.
Originally Posted by Patricia
Its great to see you back. I was worried for a sec but was ok for the rest of the few thousand moments of which you were missing.
The "Man from Del Monte" is actually a Corkman which makes it quite surprising that he has made a valid point. But miricles do happen, FF returning to gov, lazuras rising from the dead. Yep miricles can happen.
Hey Sweetie, listen my fine manly ribs cant take anymore of this. Are you suggesting that a photographer went out to photograph Ken next to his fireengine in all his glory??? All for E-I. I can imagine it now. Great stuff Ken, unbotton that shirt and look up at your fire engines door knob, hold it, great shot.How about on from the rear Ken? Thats it ,god Ken you sexy beast, hold it ,good shot. Lets go to the side of the fire engine now Ken. Common Sweetie. Sometimes i think that for some to get a genuine verified photo they have to do three things,
(1) Be born.
(2) Pay Up.
(3) Be nice to the Queen.
And who the fuck is deafboy
Anyway all is well in Westville even at 8.30 in the morning.
You haven't made it clear.
Originally Posted by Patricia
You haven't made it clear at all, it's obvious that the ladies reviews, as you call them, are worded by the same person but you take deafboys as being the false one. Also if "Ken" is an innocent victim here who does not use this website how would he ring up to complain about reviews.
Your reason for thinking that Ken is genuine is because you have no evidence that he is not....., this again raises the question I have seen asked many times before here, How are escort's pics verified?
Now I also don't see a big problem here, and don't really need to chill out,
I'm just making an observation and posting my views to see did anyone else agree with me.
Originally Posted by westside
I'm glad that you think a Corkman can make a valid point.
I also think that your three steps to a verified pic could be reduced down to
STEP 2 on it's own..
Come on guys... You know it is not the case that all an escort has to do to ger his/her photos verified here is pay Pat. If it were, every escort listed would have verified pics. They don't, do they? And what do you think, the escorts with not verified pics haven't paid? You know that's not how Pat works
There isn't a simple answer to the question of how we verify pics, because it is not a simple process. Our advertising staff have to make a judgement call every time we get pics of: Do we (a) verfiy them genuine, (b) publish them as not verified or (c) not publish them at all because we believe they are fake? They use a number of tests to make that judgement call, and, where photos are verified it is where those tests have come back suggesting they are genuine. That might be because another source (e.g. photographer, web designer, punter etc) we consider trustworthy is saying they are genuine, or it might only happen after the escort has sent us a photo of himself/herself holding up a bit of paper saying "E-I". Frankly we don't say an awful lot about how we judge sometimes, because it is a tough job, and we think telling everyone about all our methods of judging might only benefit the escorts that try to scam us and you with fake photos. Our judging process is not 100% accurate, but it has shown itself to be rarely flawed (only 1 or 2 mistakes a year on average) and nothing can be 100% anyway, as occassionally genuine escorts get their friends to cover for them causing clients to not get the escort in the photo even though the photo is of a genuine escort that is working in Ireland currently.
Going back to Ken... We know people play jokes sometimes, but it is very rare for a joker to pay for advertising (this has actually never happened on E-I to date) and we do publish names / addresses / phone numbers / email addresses that anyone can contact us on anytime here if a joke were being played on them or they knew something on our site was a joke.
1or2 times a year???
I appreciate your reply but I think that " 1 or 2 times a year" is not a true reflection of the amount of times us punters see an escort that looks nothing like her verified pic.
Seeing as pics do make a difference to which escort we decide to go see if you put up a link where a punter could verify or un-verify a pic and then swiftly remove ones that have been shown as false, this would have a negative effect on the escorts business if her pic was removed and would influence her to get true pics sent in.
I know this can be done in reviews but an easier way to highlight the fraudsters would be more benificial to all..
dont fall off the stage Sweetie.....................................
you might hurt yourself. Give me a break. Tests for to verify a photo? So if i send you a photo of King Kongs nutsack with Berties head on it , you would verify it as genuine if it passes these scientific tests? Its a best guess sceanario and nothing else. And that is not genuine verified Sweetie. The only way to genuine verify a photo is,
Originally Posted by Patricia
(a) Look at it and look at the eprson at the same time.
(b) Send a photographer you know to take the pick and verify it.
(c) Get the girl to get a photo and get the photographers verification on it. (a best guess).
If you have some way of verifying a pic without both the pic and person present then darling its not genuine verified, plain and simple.
Its like the clown here that says he has an eleven inch penis , do you know how stupid you look in those photos with an obviously average tool in your hands???
My head is 36" in diameter and i can lick my own asshole,