Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Fake reviews

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    507

    Default

    i think there is a new method in place to weed them out now so the fakes never get true to be ratted

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    16,753
    Reviews
    57

    Default

    Yes, I think things have been made so strict or should I say the submitting criteria has been made so strict they never get posted. New first time reviewers are being contacted to clarify their review and they have 5 days to reply or else the review is not posted. That single act must weed out a most of the fakes, unfortunately it probably deletes a few genuine also..

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    654
    Reviews
    39

    Default

    Wouldn't be to sure about faked not getting through and don't like to cast doubts but for me 28747 and 28749 definitely have a suspicious look.

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by oneeyedreilly View Post
    Wouldn't be to sure about faked not getting through and don't like to cast doubts but for me 28747 and 28749 definitely have a suspicious look.
    well you just did but i do agree and maybe 028188

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    31,568

    Default

    I've looked at these reviews. I know the times are close together, but seriously, we do often get punters seeing two different escorts within a very short space of time from each other!!!

    Fair play to them if their 'down time' is about 5 seconds!!! LOL!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    507

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by samlad View Post
    I've looked at these reviews. I know the times are close together, but seriously, we do often get punters seeing two different escorts within a very short space of time from each other!!!

    Fair play to them if their 'down time' is about 5 seconds!!! LOL!
    reviews were wrote on the same day 18th but are for visits 3 days apart on 13th and 16th so not that close together no reasson they could not be genuine reviews by someone just catching up on reviews

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to johnmurphy For This Useful Post:

    samlad (19-09-10)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •