Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 26 of 26

Thread: Newstalk today interview with an escort

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    8,431
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anon361 View Post
    Here's the link to the podcast:

    Newstalk 106-108fm Media Player
    Ya, cream of the escorting world interviewed there alright...........
    "It's far easier to fight for principles than to live up to them."
    L

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2,552
    Reviews
    6

    Default

    Im trying to find link for you Nice because i had an issue like this a few months ago with a business client. this is the jist of what i got from yahoo

    It is not illegal to tape a phone call - recorded conversations are broadcast on radio stations daily.

    However, if you record a conversation secretly and then want to use this as evidence later on against someone, in a court case for example, this is illegal.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,395

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by An don View Post
    Im trying to find link for you Nice because i had an issue like this a few months ago with a business client. this is the jist of what i got from yahoo

    It is not illegal to tape a phone call - recorded conversations are broadcast on radio stations daily.

    However, if you record a conversation secretly and then want to use this as evidence later on against someone, in a court case for example, this is illegal.
    What sort of conversations are they? Only in special circumstances could you do anything like it. I think those would be after having been given implicit or explicit permission to broadcast them. Give me concrete examples from memory or as far as I'm concerned COMPLETELY AND ABSOLUTELY ILLEGAL.

    It is technically illegal to even record them for personal use without the other party being aware of it being recorded. Even if you never listen to them yourself it's illegal.

    Why is it that half the time I say something in favour of escorts or against some of these tossers in the media that lots of people are coming in defending them and saying that you couldn't sue them even when it's there in black and white that it's completely illegal???

    Even in the recently released Mel Gibson tapes they are considering suing him over them. Could Mel Gibson's Ex Get in Trouble Over Tapes? - E! Online The reason they mightn't sue is probably because Gibson mightn't be bothered going to court over something like that and is afraid it might hurt his reputation.
    Last edited by nicegirlsarenice; 04-08-10 at 23:44.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2,552
    Reviews
    6

    Default

    I cant disagree with you because i cant find link , im only telling you what my brief told me and i won the case . As for the wiki link there is no reference to ireland on it and has you well know we have some mad laws here . By the way how stupid do you think newstalk would be to let them selves open to a legal challenge
    Last edited by An don; 04-08-10 at 23:51.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,395

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by An don View Post
    I cant disagree with you because i cant find link , im only telling you what my brief told me and i won the case . As for the wiki link there is no reference to ireland on it and has you well know we have some mad laws here . By the way how stupid do you think newstalk would be to let them selves open to a legal challenge
    Not very stupid? They're calculating that the escorts won't know their rights or won't bother making a legal challenge against them or wouldn't know how to go about it and forget it. You're not talking about a big lawsuit, it might be around a thousand euro. Many of these cases are "in-camera" ones, which ironically means they're done privately without being allowed to be reported. They could also settle out of court.

    It's a calculated risk. The radio station won't be going under if they're sued from it. Radio stations leave themselves open to legal challenges all the time, it's a balancing act. And this time they're counting on the escorts to be nonchalent about it and allow these people to walk all over them and make money at their expense.
    Last edited by nicegirlsarenice; 05-08-10 at 00:02.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2,552
    Reviews
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nicegirlsarenice View Post
    Not very stupid? They're calculating that the escorts won't know their rights or won't bother making a legal challenge against them or wouldn't know how to go about it and forget it. You're not talking about a big lawsuit, it might be around a thousand euro. Many of these cases are "in-camera" ones, which ironically means they're done privately without being allowed to be reported. They could also settle out of court.

    It's a calculated risk. The radio station won't be going under if they're sued from it. Radio stations leave themselves open to legal challenges all the time, it's a balancing act. And this time they're counting on the escorts to be nonchalent about it and allow these people to walk all over them and make money at their expense.
    I cant only speak from my own experience and i was taken to court for recording a converstion and i won the case and my costs

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •