Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 38

Thread: jessica review

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    310
    Reviews
    18

    Default jessica review

    Just wondering, I was reading OMG's review of Jessica and noticed that as per the rules, his previous review of this girl was deleted, but this leaves him with 1 review... should the number of reviews not be accurate even if some are deleted. I only ask cos sometimes I disregard single reviewers as suspect but say if someone has reviewed a girl they like, maybe 3 or 4 times should they not be credited with that number of reviews even if the others have been deleted? I know it might be a database thing, i.e. if you click on the link to that person's reviews, it has a number and maybe that is a database result. Just a (hopefully) helpful comment.....

    BLD

  2. #2

    Default

    I tend agree with this point of view. The credentials of the reviewer are important when trying to decide on a choice. One tends to rely on the reviews of those who post most reviews BUT I am unsure of what to do with one if ...say... they showed 20 reviews but only 3 could be read. One can take more from the Quality of the review and the 'apparent' accuracy. I'm all for good genuine reviews as they can save you a lot of money and save you a lot of frustration.

  3. Default

    I always make sure that there are a couple of good reviews, by reviewers with more than 3 reviews, before contacting a girl.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    5,355

    Default

    Its swings and roundabouts, someone who has a duo booking can write two reviews but it's the one event so he gets an extra review added for same booking.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    8,431
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bigladdub View Post
    Just wondering, I was reading OMG's review of Jessica and noticed that as per the rules, his previous review of this girl was deleted, but this leaves him with 1 review... should the number of reviews not be accurate even if some are deleted. I only ask cos sometimes I disregard single reviewers as suspect but say if someone has reviewed a girl they like, maybe 3 or 4 times should they not be credited with that number of reviews even if the others have been deleted? I know it might be a database thing, i.e. if you click on the link to that person's reviews, it has a number and maybe that is a database result. Just a (hopefully) helpful comment.....

    BLD
    I see your point, but this is technically impossible. Sorry.........
    "It's far easier to fight for principles than to live up to them."
    L

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    310
    Reviews
    18

    Default

    In reality, does no other user (and reviewer) think that this is a little off? This reviewer saw this escort with his wife and then on his own. Surely those would be very different experiences, as different as seeing an escort alone or as a duo... It must be something that would be accepted as an exception to the general rule (which I agree with completely)....

    Even if the two reviews arent kept current, I think that the reviewer should have two reviews rather than one...

    I have been disagreed with already by some very respected members of the site as well as the moderator who had to make a call on what to do with the two reviews.... If I have any support, I would love to see it as postings because that is the only thing thatg will make a difference. If not, then I am in danger of being considered to be part of the lunatic fringe!!!

    BLD

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    16,753
    Reviews
    57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bigladdub View Post
    In reality, does no other user (and reviewer) think that this is a little off? This reviewer saw this escort with his wife and then on his own. Surely those would be very different experiences, as different as seeing an escort alone or as a duo... It must be something that would be accepted as an exception to the general rule (which I agree with completely)....

    Even if the two reviews aren't kept current, I think that the reviewer should have two reviews rather than one...

    I have been disagreed with already by some very respected members of the site as well as the moderator who had to make a call on what to do with the two reviews.... If I have any support, I would love to see it as postings because that is the only thing that will make a difference. If not, then I am in danger of being considered to be part of the lunatic fringe!!!

    BLD
    Maybe you mis-interpreted me, I totally agree with you comment, in this instance he should really be allowed a second review as they were 2 completely different experiences but QPH's point and I agree with him, the rules are quite clear, 1 positive or 1 negative review or 1 of both per member.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    5,355

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bigladdub View Post
    In reality, does no other user (and reviewer) think that this is a little off? This reviewer saw this escort with his wife and then on his own. Surely those would be very different experiences, as different as seeing an escort alone or as a duo... It must be something that would be accepted as an exception to the general rule (which I agree with completely)....

    Even if the two reviews arent kept current, I think that the reviewer should have two reviews rather than one...

    I have been disagreed with already by some very respected members of the site as well as the moderator who had to make a call on what to do with the two reviews.... If I have any support, I would love to see it as postings because that is the only thing thatg will make a difference. If not, then I am in danger of being considered to be part of the lunatic fringe!!!

    BLD
    I never said I disagreed with you, I am only stating what the current rules allow and I have to follow, if the rules were different I would follow those ones.
    Last edited by Quarterpoundher; 04-08-10 at 01:07.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    310
    Reviews
    18

    Default

    Qph

    Is it not the case that you are going on your interpretation of the rules? My view is that the two should be allowed (albeit on the basis of an intelligent interpretation of the rules)

    Before you respond, I am not saying that you are not intelligent.... I just think that one could have interpreted the rules differently... But then, I would say that, wouldn't I....

    BLD

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    5,355

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bigladdub View Post
    Qph

    Is it not the case that you are going on your interpretation of the rules? My view is that the two should be allowed (albeit on the basis of an intelligent interpretation of the rules)

    Before you respond, I am not saying that you are not intelligent.... I just think that one could have interpreted the rules differently... But then, I would say that, wouldn't I....

    BLD
    Read the rules, there is no ambiguity contained in them, there is zero room for interpretation, its ONE review per poster and until it says that if you bring the football team along with you and that allows you to write 11 reviews not including the subs then that is what is going to continue to be done.

    One review per reviewer and older one deleted.
    Last edited by Quarterpoundher; 04-08-10 at 01:43.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •