reviews without an accurate date

[thehighwayman]

Alot of reviews get submitted that say this appointment happened some time ago or not sure of the exact date. What we have been doing lately is pming members who don't put down an accurate date. If they don't respond with an accurate date or any response it gets deleted. We give them 48 hours to respond. Alot of times you see them logged in a day or so after you pmd them and they still don't respond. If they can't be bothered to reply then it's deleted. You see these reviews could be outside the 3 month rule we have no way of knowing unless we check with them. Also the escort doesn't have a chnace to write a rebuttal if she chooses to as how would she know this is writing the review. If we allowed thia to happen anyone could write a bad review about an escort without her knowing who it is and whehter she saw him or not. A new member today submitted such a review without a date. I pmd him. He didn't respond and what he done instead was submit 2 further reviews saying he wasn't sure of the date.

[JohnRambo]

Alot of reviews get submitted that say this appointment happened some time ago or not sure of the exact date. What we have been doing lately is pming members who don't put down an accurate date. If they don't respond with an accurate date or any response it gets deleted. We give them 48 hours to respond. Alot of times you see them logged in a day or so after you pmd them and they still don't respond. If they can't be bothered to reply then it's deleted. You see these reviews could be outside the 3 month rule we have no way of knowing unless we check with them. Also the escort doesn't have a chnace to write a rebuttal if she chooses to as how would she know this is writing the review. If we allowed thia to happen anyone could write a bad review about an escort without her knowing who it is and whehter she saw him or not. A new member today submitted such a review without a date. I pmd him. He didn't respond and what he done instead was submit 2 further reviews saying he wasn't sure of the date.

Highway you and I have talked about these types of issues before, people not putting the correct dates and times, people submitting reviews all in caps, people submitting reviews over the 3 month rule and as far as I’m concerned I will not be holding their hand when they know the rules, I will either rat or delete, like I said I won’t be holding anyone’s hand like re-doing reviews in lowercase from caps. Some people just can’t be bothered and submit the first thing that pops into their heads, if they can’t be bothered submitting a review correctly why then should we?

John.

[debest]

Highway.....are you only deleting bad reviews? or positive as well?

What are you asking the reviewers?? An exact date? An approximate?

Are all reviews outside the 3 month rule going to be deleted? I have a couple myself, but that was before the rule came in. What will happen in a case like this?

I agree in principle though....

[debest]

Highway you and I have talked about these types of issues before, people not putting the correct dates and times, people submitting reviews all in caps, people submitting reviews over the 3 month rule and as far as I’m concerned I will not be holding their hand when they know the rules, I will either rat or delete, like I said I won’t be holding anyone’s hand like re-doing reviews in lowercase from caps. Some people just can’t be bothered and submit the first thing that pops into their heads, if they can’t be bothered submitting a review correctly why then should we?

John.

I agree with you here John.....

I would say it would be better to delete the review as it can make the escort look bad if there is a rat beside a positive review.

[thehighwayman]

The reviews before the 3 month rule stay as they are. An accurate date is what we need. Otherwise reviews with things like I saw her some time ago or can't remember the date will get deleted unless were given an accurate date. If they don't respond to us they get deleted.

[Mymisters]

The reviews before the 3 month rule stay as they are. An accurate date is what we need. Otherwise reviews with things like I saw her some time ago or can't remember the date will get deleted unless were given an accurate date. If they don't respond to us they get deleted.

I agree in principal to this but if the reviewer just makes up a time and date because they can't remember you're none the wiser unless the escorts says she didn't meet him at that time. Unless the review is bad that won't happen.
I can't think of a better system though.

[Quarterpoundher]

I agree in principal to this but if the reviewer just makes up a time and date because they can't remember you're none the wiser unless the escorts says she didn't meet him at that time. Unless the review is bad that won't happen.
I can't think of a better system though.

You have hit the nail on the head in saying "I can't think of a better system though" as that applies to every single aspect of anything to do with reviews when its two parties that know who is telling the truth and nobody else can possibly know and that includes you me all mods and everybody reading this.

However there has to be some reference point for an escort to have some hope of figuring out if she/he saw him/her, yes he could put down anything but at least he is committing himself to some point in time and not writing a review in which he can recall every little thing in minute detail and is very put out about this and that but cannot recall the time and date.

Its also not fair to just assume that its only ever going to be a bad review that will be challenged, it was discussed here only the other day that an escort challenged a pos and we all saw her reward from the reviewer for her honesty but its not for us to assume others will not do so and a starting point for them to do so is an accurate or at least a stated date is what is required regardless of it being a positive or a negative.

[An don]

This is a strange one to say the least , I have never wrote a review for the simple reason the ladies i seen have a shit load any way so my paltry review would not make great difference any way. But my experience on this site and on others is that a lot of reviewers are weary of giving a correct details for simple reasons . And people will think i am mental but the gardai do watch locations so for example you right review saying you saw this lady at ex time and the link your user time to ip you are fucked. Secondly maybe regurlar reviewers see a lady with a lot of good reviews and they dont want to be the bearer of bad news if they dont click in appointment . I really do pity the review guys in these instance as they try to be fair to all .
Guys can say they see a lady inside the last three months as then dont want personal info posted as the lady is disgruntled by a bad review or the lady can say see cant remember the appointment thus discounting the credibility of review. Its a catch 22 situation. Not a perfect system by no means but i think its one of the best around.

As for the highwaymans original post about pming people looking the exact time dont hold your breath because if it was i and considering the nature of the privacy issue i wouldnt tell you.
What i think it boils down too is this and this is harsh now . People who look after reviews have to use ther own cop on and have to decide which has more credibilty escort or reviewer ,rather you than me

[sharkskin]

I think that there is a way of improving the current system.

Ask the reviewer to post an accurate time and date and make those visible to the escort and the review mods but do not post the time and date with the review for all to see. That way, the escort will be able to connect the review to the client and the mods will see what is going on without publishing information that the reviewer might like to keep out of the public domain.

Perhaps the review could then be published with a date such as "Week 27 4th July--11th July 2010" or something.

Would that help?

[Quarterpoundher]

I think that there is a way of improving the current system.

Ask the reviewer to post an accurate time and date and make those visible to the escort and the review mods but do not post the time and date with the review for all to see. That way, the escort will be able to connect the review to the client and the mods will see what is going on without publishing information that the reviewer might like to keep out of the public domain.

Perhaps the review could then be published with a date such as "Week 27 4th July--11th July 2010" or something.

Would that help?

There is currently no means by which the three stated parties could all see that and no one else but tbh if someone has a privacy issue with stating a time/date, even when using a made up cybername then they should not bother posting review at all. I have heard some don't want other escorts to get "jealous" when they canceled them and saw someone else.

ffs sake this is sex between strangers for money, jealously does not come into it and if it does then something has gone wrong somewhere.