Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: Attractive -- v --- Fairly attractive

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,473
    Blog Entries
    2
    Reviews
    36

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by An don View Post
    i think the appearance comment should not be there at all particurly when reviewing an escort that has verified pictures .Let every man judge for him self but dont call a lady unattractive or fairly attractive . Not nice
    Yes, let everyman judge for himself and tastes differ but no matter what differences there are,each guy has to make his own call and I think asking him to say ' fairly' with no other alternative is unfair and can be insulting where the reviewer doesnt want to insult , recognises that she is attractive but yet feels in his eyes she just falls short of top marks.

    I think it is right that the reviewer be asked to specifically comment on this as it is important and he may have ommitted to address it in his main comments. photos can not be representative of the girl, good or bad, and I really appreciate hearing a view ' from the horses mouth '.!

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    776
    Reviews
    4

    Default

    What about
    "she's no show pony but would do for ridin round da house"?

    No seriously, beauty is in the eye of the beholder so one guys idea of gorgeous could be different from the next.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    4,869
    Reviews
    28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JAMESCORK View Post
    Wel i'd put it to ya Harry. If I was to say this girl is attractive or she is FAIRLY attractive. The word FAIRLY in OIRISH terms really means we are not quite happy with her appearance. The word Fairly tends to the negative rather than to the positive if you know what i mean. Thats all..
    alright i see your point attractive ----and very attractive maybe would be better then ok drop the fairly then i have seen your point of view and agree now

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    21,994
    Reviews
    113

    Default

    Unfortunately Don the verification system is not entirely to be trusted. Photos can be seriously brushed. I put it to you, having studied a girls profile and especially her photos, have you ever been even slightly disappointed with the real thing. Also a lot of photos do not show the face.

    It has happened also that I have found a girl to be more attractive than her photos so it can work both ways. This question is vital on a review for me and in a lot of cases the answer of same is one of my deciding factors when ‘closing the deal’. I tend to put the visual attribute over the service received. I have found a lot of reviews have been very positive but ‘fairly attractive’ was chosen by many. This gives me a better expectation.

    I think the issue here is the divide between ‘Very Attractive’ and ‘Fairly Attractive’ is too big. In the case where a reviewer says ‘Neither attractive or not attractive’ or worse, I would normally view the rest of his reviews to see if I have seen his girls to make a judgment on his tastes. A lot of reviewers in my opinion do not describe the girl sufficiently so in these cases this question is a vital bit of info.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •