?????//????

[Quarterpoundher]

Sorry but one thing strikes me with this thread that I find confusing, a few months ago we had uproar to un-rat JessicaJessy's review which was ratted along with all the other reviews written by a guy found to be submitting fake reviews; now the argument is all this guys reviews should be ratted and not just his latest 2 because he is obviously fake no matter if some of his reviews are true!; Kinda contradictory don't you think
As for the review of Nikky, obviously either fake or he picked the wrong Nikky..

Hypocrisy here is the one constant Anon... kinda reassuring in a way...

[El Gordo]

I dont think its helpful that there are no comments as to why the rats were added or by who

I've said this before, more than once, but nothing seems to happen: The system should be set up so it automatically shows who ratted the review. Just as the boards software automatically shows who edited a post. It also shouldn't allow a rat without some sort of comment. Of course, there will always be people who get around that with useless comments like "This Review is believes to be fake", but I think most people will give proper reasons, especially if they know their names will be listed after them.

Sorry but one thing strikes me with this thread that I find confusing, a few months ago we had uproar to un-rat JessicaJessy's review which was ratted along with all the other reviews written by a guy found to be submitting fake reviews; now the argument is all this guys reviews should be ratted and not just his latest 2 because he is obviously fake no matter if some of his reviews are true!; Kinda contradictory don't you think
As for the review of Nikky, obviously either fake or he picked the wrong Nikky..

The difference here is that no one is saying that any of this guy's reviews are real. Maybe someone will, but so far that hasn't happened.

[kerry lad in town]

Hi Anon,

i dont know about that case. Anyway even he picked wrong Nikky he try to put otheres 11 girls in bad light. So all his reviews should be mark as rat...

it might be sorted out today
https://www.escort-ireland.com/board...tml#post229167

[Blond chick NIKKY]

I have not met the other escorts this person has posted reviews for but having met Nikky I can only say that his comments about her are totally off the mark.Nikky is one of the top escorts on this site.As to whether his other reviews should be ratted I think the answer should be clear to most people here.

Hi Westcorklad,

thank you very much. Thats very nice of you. xxx

[Blond chick NIKKY]

it might be sorted out today
https://www.escort-ireland.com/board...tml#post229167

Hiya KLIT,

hope so! Tks anyway x

[anon361]

The difference here is that no one is saying that any of this guy's reviews are real. Maybe someone will, but so far that hasn't happened.

I'm neutral on this one and to be honest I can't see how he could have given Nikky such a review had he seen her, just a question and I know it's a personal one but does Nikky have an inverted nipple? At least on that point it would prove he hadn't seen her, if she has it is his right to leave whatever review he feels no matter how wrong others may feel him to be.. As for the rest of his reviews, how is he any different to this guy, he too only has 3 positive reviews out of his first 13 and nobody is calling to have his reviews ratted , now don't get me wrong, I am not trying to cast any shadow as to the veracity of peters reviews, just giving a comparison..

[Alana]

I would agree that an explaination is best if possible but sometimes to do that would alert fakers how we knew it was a fake and they would change tactics.

Why are some reviews rejected or edited or ratted?
We reject or edit or rat escort reviews submitted to us if:
(a) We establish they are untrue / malicious
(b) They are very poorly written / illegible / typed all in CAPS
(c) Our systems determine they are likely to be escort self-promotion (We record the IP etc details of each review submitted. Escorts can register multiple IDs here, and then post multiple positive reviews of themselves, but we will almost certainly catch you out if you try to play this game!)
(d) The meeting was more than 3 months ago. If you try circumvent this rule by saying "not exact date" the review will not be posted.
(e) The review contains swearing, insulting, degrading or abusive language.
(f) The review reveals info about the escort that it is not necessary to say and may comprimise the lady's privacy, e.g. saying exactly what hotel or apartments she is in, that she has a tattoo of X or is a student of Y etc.
(g) The review is a sexually explicit review of an escort who has asked clients not to leave sexually explicit reviews. Where a lady has requested reviewers don't leave sexually explicit reviews, a message stating this is shown to the reviewer at the time he is making the review. We ask reviewers to respect the escorts wishes in this situation, i.e. Say the lady provided a poor service by all means if you feel she did, but don't say her blow job skills were lacking or something explicit like that.
(h) The review is negative but no explanation as to why is given. It is not considered fair to leave a negative review without saying why.
(i) The reviews is not entirely in English. No foreign language reviews or comments not in English are allowed.
(j) The review has been copied from somewhere else.

Its not as if were talking about national security here QPH, the hurdles to overcome whether good or bad are listed above for all to see, the point i'm making is if a review is ratted which of the above is it ? and who decided ? this would give the escort or client a direct name to deal with to sort the matter out and enable her/him to respond to which review has been questioned and why.
Anti-virus companies employ the best hackers in the world for a reason, because the tatics are always changing however the blatantly obvious is ofton staring us in the face.

[Quarterpoundher]

I'm neutral on this one and to be honest I can't see how he could have given Nikky such a review had he seen her, just a question and I know it's a personal one but does Nikky have an inverted nipple? At least on that point it would prove he hadn't seen her, if she has it is his right to leave whatever review he feels no matter how wrong others may feel him to be.. As for the rest of his reviews, how is he any different to this guy, he too only has 3 positive reviews out of his first 13 and nobody is calling to have his reviews ratted , now don't get me wrong, I am not trying to cast any shadow as to the veracity of peters reviews, just giving a comparison..

Its probably because none of the escorts who got a neg are well known posters so hence no op for people to come storming in here on a white charger...

[Quarterpoundher]

Its not as if were talking about national security here QPH, the hurdles to overcome whether good or bad are listed above for all to see, the point i'm making is if a review is ratted which of the above is it ? and who decided ? this would give the escort or client a direct name to deal with to sort the matter out and enable her/him to respond to which review has been questioned and why.
Anti-virus companies employ the best hackers in the world for a reason, because the tatics are always changing however the blatantly obvious is ofton staring us in the face.

No we are not Elle... but I have come up with one or two ways of seeing if a reviewer is probably a faker and there is not a lot of point in telling him how on the ratted review as then he will change tactic's and not do that again so would you rather it be ratted and hopefully you might trust my honesty in why its ratted but not state why or would you rather I tell all and have more fakes submitted by him or others that I would not be able to use anymore?

In fairness I try and state why I feel they are fake, pointed out contradictions and if he said xyz I pointed out if many others said the opposite and I recall I got my ass handed to me for doing so again to the broader readership make up your minds.

Also.. but when a review is ratted is says something along the lines that we "feel" its fake.. does not say anything about we have come up with Judge Judy level proof, that wording has been there on a rat statement since long before any com mods started helping in reviews.

[El Gordo]

No we are not Elle... but I have come up with one or two ways of seeing if a reviewer is probably a faker and there is not a lot of point in telling him how on the ratted review as then he will change tactic's and not do that again so would you rather it be ratted and hopefully you might trust my honesty in why its ratted but not state why or would you rather I tell all and have more fakes submitted by him or others that I would not be able to use anymore?

In fairness I try and state why I feel they are fake, pointed out contradictions and if he said xyz I pointed out if many others said the opposite and I recall I got my ass handed to me for doing so again to the broader readership make up your minds.

Also.. but when a review is ratted is says something along the lines that we "feel" its fake.. does not say anything about we have come up with Judge Judy level proof, that wording has been there on a rat statement since long before any com mods started helping in reviews.

I've said before that a reviews mod's job is basically an impossible one, and I dont envy you. But I would make one point. You seem to be confusing honesty and judgment. If you rat a review then I'm sure you feel it's fake. And I would say you're usually right. But it's a lot easier to be sure of that when we know the reasons. You usually give reasons, and I've commended you on that in the past. But when reasons are absent or partial there is always going to be doubt, and you shouldn't interpret that as people doubting you honesty, when they're just wondering if you haven't perhaps made a mistake.