Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Escort 14253 Anna Maria

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    5,362

    Default Escort 14253 Anna Maria

    Changed pics and nationality, was Turkish last week and today is from Portugal. Bust size was 36DD, now is 36D. Respective sets of pics seem to reflect this downsizing in the space of a few days.

    Older profile...



    Today's profile...



    UPDATE 02-06-10

    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	14253 Anna Maria 02.jpg 
Views:	283 
Size:	99.0 KB 
ID:	23551   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	14253 Anna Maria 01.jpg 
Views:	281 
Size:	102.7 KB 
ID:	23552   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	14253 Anna Maria 03.jpg 
Views:	171 
Size:	99.3 KB 
ID:	23775  
    Last edited by Quarterpoundher; 02-06-10 at 13:06.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,066
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Looks like some girls look getting better and better evryday

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    5,362

    Default

    Please see update 02-06-10 on first post on this thread.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,066
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    These reports make a difference. This lady had her pictures banned on her profile for 30days. Pictures which you currently see on her profile are genuine, however this lady do not allow reviews, so photos are marked as not genuine(it may seem a bit complecated). The most important fakt is that this lady decided to advertise with genuine pictures only, it presume it would not happend withiut this report and taken action.
    sarah

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    5,362

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sarah View Post
    These reports make a difference. This lady had her pictures banned on her profile for 30days. Pictures which you currently see on her profile are genuine, however this lady do not allow reviews, so photos are marked as not genuine(it may seem a bit complecated). The most important fakt is that this lady decided to advertise with genuine pictures only, it presume it would not happend withiut this report and taken action.
    sarah
    Yes you are right Sarah, I only stated that this was an update, never said the new ones were not real as I have no way to know, just updated it so people could compare and be made aware of the change, hopefully, as was my intention, highlighting these will encourage the ones chopping and changing or that have pics taken from net to go about being a bit more upfront about things, in fairness a small few seem to be doing that, you go into a fruit shop based on what the shop front looks like, if its got apples on sale on the window you don't expect to see angle grinders on the shelf when you go in and its not what you went in there for. Its only reasonable to expect that the shop front here (profile pics and stats) work in a similar way.

    Also Sarah acts very fast to any issue I post about here, she does her very best and I commend her for her time and effort in all matters.
    Last edited by Quarterpoundher; 02-06-10 at 14:33.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    5,362

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sarah View Post
    Pictures which you currently see on her profile are genuine, however this lady do not allow reviews, so photos are marked as not genuine(it may seem a bit complecated).
    It would help a lot if escorts that dont allow reviews but that you know the pics are them as much as its possible to determine from verification pic that someway to state that on the profile, at the moment you (plural), rightly or wrongly just assume that pics are fake when that may not be the case, it would be fairer to the escort that has real pics but just does not want reviews and also be more informative to a potential customer.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    North Korea
    Posts
    16,828
    Reviews
    57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Quarterpoundher View Post
    It would help a lot if escorts that dont allow reviews but that you know the pics are them as much as its possible to determine from verification pic that someway to state that on the profile, at the moment you (plural), rightly or wrongly just assume that pics are fake when that may not be the case, it would be fairer to the escort that has real pics but just does not want reviews and also be more informative to a potential customer.
    But the whole point of their pictures being marked not verified was a compromise Patricia came up with so as to keep both sides happy(escorts and clients). While patricia did not want to stop ladies from not allowing reviews she wanted to keep the clients happy by enforcing this rule so as to gently nudge those ladies towards accepting reviews. That was my undersatanding of the rule and as far as I am concerned if you start marking these pictures as verified even more ladies will start to opt out!!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    5,362

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anon361 View Post
    But the whole point of their pictures being marked not verified was a compromise Patricia came up with so as to keep both sides happy(escorts and clients). While patricia did not want to stop ladies from not allowing reviews she wanted to keep the clients happy by enforcing this rule so as to gently nudge those ladies towards accepting reviews. That was my undersatanding of the rule and as far as I am concerned if you start marking these pictures as verified even more ladies will start to opt out!!
    Thats fair enough but its their right to not have reviews if they dont want but its not fair to force having unverified pics marked as such just to make them allow reviews, in the case as seems here for example Sarah said current pics are her so it would be fairer if escorts who did supply a verified pic and it was seen to be her (even if we did have to go around the houses before she did) that the pics be verified as real and still opt out, thats just my take on it, I off course take on board that most who opt out do so for dubious reasons but a small few surly exist that are genuine but just don't want to have reviews of their exploits posted to the world even as a sudonym.

    Its not really a gentle nudge for that small demograpic, its forced on them imo.
    Last edited by Quarterpoundher; 02-06-10 at 15:44.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    North Korea
    Posts
    16,828
    Reviews
    57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Quarterpoundher View Post
    Thats fair enough but its their right to not have reviews if they dont want but its not fair to force having unverified pics marked as such just to make them allow reviews, in the case as seems here for example Sarah said current pics are her so it would be fairer if escorts how did supply a verified pic and it was seen to be her that the pics be verified as real and still opt out, thats just my take on it, I off course take on board that most who opt out do so for dubious reasons but a small few surly exist that are genuine but just don't want to have reviews of their exploits posted to the world even as a sudonym.

    Its not really a gentle nudge for that small demograpic, its forced on them imo.
    But those that do allow reviews also have the option of no explicit details, again part of the compromise.. I agree QPH if it were only a few but it would open the flood gates to the amount that would opt out. Ok the main reason a lot were opting out was because of the poor way the reviews was being run and thanks to you and the other mods that is no longer the case but as far as I am aware this is one of the very few escort sites that does allow ladies to opt out so Patricia is still being fair. At the end of the day we are the clients paying for the ladies time and companionship and to do so it is only fair that we have all the facts and a bad escort being allowed to opt out of the review system to decieve clients is not fair. If an alternative was devised to nudge ladies into keep allowing reviews such as charging those that don't a higher rate but still allowing them to have their photos verified fine, at least it would in some way help to prevent ladies from opting out and help us the client, the one handing over the cash to make an informed decision with the complete story..

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    5,362

    Default

    True. The greater good is served I agree but I don't agree with the sins of the many forcing things on those admittedly small in number that are not hoodwinking anyone or treating people like walking atm's and just dont want reviews full stop, edited to high heaven even. I just think some little clue on advert that E-I saw verification pic and it is them might be helpful. At least some way of knowing that its not a fake pic as thats what I assume and dare say others do perhaps.
    Last edited by Quarterpoundher; 02-06-10 at 16:01.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •