Another Classic review

[Anna23]

Well, my living expenses are actually e40 a week if I dont count my bloody expensive rent of course.
Now 60e a week is much more than what I got payed in my very first job for instance.
So yea, for me 60e a week presents good money.
Not to mention that some are willing to have a cheesy cock down their throat and mouth filled with cum of a stranger who hopefully is not infected with anything for this kind of money.

If you cannot appreciate your income then its no wonder that your doing a louzy job.

[thehighwayman]

Theres a few of us that do reviews and theres a few others that don't do reviews and mod the forums. We're not going around like headless chickens going over the same things. We do communicate and discuss things amongst us. If one of us aren't going to be around for a day or two we let the rest know. Nothing gets overlooked as far as I can see. When you get some messer posting rubbish it's usually deleted within minutes or someone comes to us about something we deal with it promptly. Even during easter and weekends all the reviews were done. Theres always a few of us around.

[thehighwayman]

So why does it say "forum& reviews moderator" under your user name?
Dont forget that people know that you are payed for modding even if its just a "little", this makes it your job too.

There are a few moderators that don't take any money for doing this. I'm not saying who does or who doesn't. It's none of your business

[Anna23]

Theres a few of us that do reviews and theres a few others that don't do reviews and mod the forums. We're not going around like headless chickens going over the same things. We do communicate and discuss things amongst us. If one of us aren't going to be around for a day or two we let the rest know. Nothing gets overlooked as far as I can see. When you get some messer posting rubbish it's usually deleted within minutes or someone comes to us about something we deal with it promptly. Even during easter and weekends all the reviews were done. Theres always a few of us around.

I see and appreciate the good work you guys do but still cannot understand why there are sections for which this doesnt apply ( i.e non advertisers adverts )
I'll repeat what was called for many times before - consistency and transparency is needed.

[Quarterpoundher]

Well, my living expenses are actually e40 a week if I dont count my bloody expensive rent of course.
Now 60e a week is much more than what I got payed in my very first job for instance.
So yea, for me 60e a week presents good money.
Not to mention that some are willing to have a cheesy cock down their throat and mouth filled with cum of a stranger who hopefully is not infected with anything for this kind of money.

If you cannot appreciate your income then its no wonder that your doing a louzy job.

I will take that post as tounge in cheek as you cannot possibly be serious but just say you are...

You got 60 for first job as a teenager but you expect me a grown adult to sit here for 40 hours and survive in this day and age on 60 euro a week? So I am supposed to drop my real job which incidentally I spend 3 times that ammount of feed for my Horses so what do I say to the two thirds of them that I could not feed if I took Anna Hobbs school of loony tune economics ?

Or what would I eat myself?

God you really do expect a lot for 60. Ok then Anna, put your money where your mouth is, put up an ad here saying you can be booked for 40 hours for 60 euro and then I might consider starving my horses just so I can be on standby for a thankless individual like you.

Then and only then will I take you seriously on this..

[Mousey]

I want to be a mod. Are you listening, Patricia?

I'll take €50 a week, be twice as pompous, ban every fucker that posts a swear word, and award myself more medals than a school sports day.

Best online CV you'll get this year!!

[El Gordo]

Someone has to be responsible for reviews. We can't have people saying they'll do it if they feel like it or have time. This is a core component of the site. If running the thing an amateur basis, or semi-pro in some cases, isn't working then Pat will simply need to hire someone.

[thehighwayman]

This isn't semi pro or amateur what we do. We put in an awful lot of time and effort into reviews. I can't see how one full time person could do any better. Theres no need for Patricia to hire anyone to do the reviews as we are doing it comfortably. Since we started doing it at the start of the year I've been activating reviews almost everyday. Apart from a couple of days here and there that I wasn't here. But those couple of days I took off still means that I've been on here at least 6 days every week at various times through the day. On those days I haven't been here othe rmods have been doing them. Some weeks including easter I've been here for the whole week. The reviews are my priority now when I go on to this site. Unless I get a pm from someone or an urgent reported post I deal with the reviews. Not only do I deal with reviews alot but QPH puts in an alot of time and effort as can be seen by this https://www.escort-ireland.com/board...is-lass-s.html West and doozer also help out. In the event that none of us are here which is very rare Ad Staff or Sarah would step in and do the reviews. I have been modding since last June and apart from Christmas week theres always been a few mods online everyday.

[Quarterpoundher]

Someone has to be responsible for reviews. We can't have people saying they'll do it if they feel like it or have time. This is a core component of the site. If running the thing an amateur basis, or semi-pro in some cases, isn't working then Pat will simply need to hire someone.

There is she is called Sarah... We put reviews on hold for her attention when required and we deal with the rest ourselves when we feel like doing them. She works here and we don't. She has the final say on anything to do with reviews and she wont hear a peep out of me whatever she decides.

[jimbobbins]

Well now u wouldnt have to be a genius to figure out that review is suspect, its written in the very same
style as the intro on her profile and to rat a review just says that its THOUGHT to be fake not that it definitely
is. If u put together all the evidence there is morer than a strong possibility that this review is fake.
Also there is a previous review from a reviewer with over 40 reviews saying that it is not the girl in the
photos,eventhough she still has verefied pics and that favs were not avaliable and overall service was
terrible

I agree with ber and Anna. I wish a bit of common sense could be used in relation to the reviews. This review manages to be obviously phony and completely incomprehensible at the same time which is some feat. QPH it was yourself that brought up the subject of "grammar". Do a quick search on the thread. The word has hardly been used by any other poster but you've repeatedly used it. Anna said clearly why she felt it should be ratted and still you've accused her of wanting the review ratted "just" because of the grammar.

Jimbob