Suspicious client!!

[ber]

well i think when the first post which started the topic of a thread are removed it is only fair then that the whole tread is removed as something
that will be said in later posts can be misinterpretted which is what has happened and is not fair to the poster

[carlos marvado]

well i think when the first post which started the topic of a thread are removed it is only fair then that the whole tread is removed as something
that will be said in later posts can be misinterpretted which is what has happened and is not fair to the poster

Actually in between the time that I went to move the first and second posts on this thread and them being moved by the system, the third post was posted, which now appears as the first post.

Having said that, I think it is clear to anybody who reads the entirety of the thread what happened.

[jackpot]

well i think when the first post which started the topic of a thread are removed it is only fair then that the whole tread is removed as something
that will be said in later posts can be misinterpretted which is what has happened and is not fair to the poster

No no Ber.
Maybe the first post should be put back!
But a most unusual statement was made by a so called "trusted" user.
It can not be just swept under the carpet now.

[anon361]

No no Ber.
Maybe the first post should be put back!
But a most unusual statement was made by a so called "trusted" user.
It can not be just swept under the carpet now.

ODD, why are you out for blood?? I took what he said in jest, did you not or am I a bit slow this evening??

[jackpot]

ODD, why are you out for blood?? I took what he said in jest, did you not or am I a bit slow this evening??

Well I suppose only Ber knows if he was joking or not. But I don't see any attempt at humour in his post just a request to have the thread deleted. If your were joking Ber I apologise

[nicegirlsarenice]

Well I suppose only Ber knows if he was joking or not. But I don't see any attempt at humour in his post just a request to have the thread deleted. If your were joking Ber I apologise

ber was not joking, JAMESCORK was joking, his post was in jest. I'm fairly certain that anon361 was talking about JAMESCORK's post.

I think it was said in jest as well, but could be viewed as being a bit borderline for a "trusted reviewer" to be saying something like that.

As with the politicians, when you have a respected/trusted position you have to be a bit more careful in what you say.... especially since that type of bribary could potentially go on.... not that I'm accusing JAMESCORK in any way of it as it's obvious he was joking.

[jackpot]

ber was not joking, JAMESCORK was joking, his post was in jest. I'm fairly certain that anon361 was talking about JAMESCORK's post.

I think it was said in jest as well, but could be viewed as being a bit borderline for a "trusted reviewer" to be saying something like that.

As with the politicians, when you have a respected/trusted position you have to be a bit more careful in what you say.... especially since that type of bribary could potentially go on.... not that I'm accusing JAMESCORK in any way of it as it's obvious he was joking.

I'm sorry but I do not see how it's obvious he (JAMESCORK) was joking!!

Maybe he is shy and was unable to go through with it. Anyway - watch yourself honey.

And if ya need a big strong man to protect you - I am only 2 mins away.

(All i want in return is a quick bj - deal?)

Wooo. I didnt start this. First 2 post mysteriously disappeared leaving me all on my owneo..

What I see is that someone who is shy can be sorted by a big strong man who in return wants a quick bj as part of the deal!
Now if it said something like (All i want in return is a quick bj - LOL) it might be obvious that it was meant to be a joke but that is not what it says.
In fairness to James there appears to be previous posts missing which possibily have landed him in the brown stuff. I'm sure in time he will enlighten us what he meant by such a comment "especially since that type of bribary could potentially go on...."

[anon361]

I'm sorry but I do not see how it's obvious he (JAMESCORK) was joking!!




What I see is that someone who is shy can be sorted by a big strong man who in return wants a quick bj as part of the deal!
Now if it said something like (All i want in return is a quick bj - LOL) it might be obvious that it was meant to be a joke but that is not what it says.
In fairness to James there appears to be previous posts missing which possibily have landed him in the brown stuff. I'm sure in time he will enlighten us what he meant by such a comment "especially since that type of bribary could potentially go on...."

This is getting a bit silly, of course he was joking, a big bit in bad taste on a warning thread but we don't know his previous dealings / relationship with the lady that put up the warning or even it's contents so I wouldn't condemn him for it either!! not just yet anyway

[Taylor of Manchester]

If you are going to carry on like this can you take it outside ??

Latyla posted a warning for the girls in the wrong place, it has since been moved.

If JAMESCORK was really serious about his 'freebie BJ' don't you think he would have PM'd her

FFS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! lads !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Get a grip.

T
xxx

[JAMESCORK]

Coming from a trusted reviewer, this sounds really bad

Yip this makes me look like a real Langer. But what you guys dont know is that there was 2 posts before mine which would easily explain the sitch - but they were removed quite suddenly. A certain Escort was worried about a visit minutes before my post and to which I was responding to. So relax guys I havent lost the plot... not quite yet. And furthermore thanks Layla for you suport.