Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Review Count on "Top 30" is slightly off

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    996
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Review Count on "Top 30" is slightly off

    Is there a small glitch in the system in the "Top 30 Reviewed Escorts", where the number of the reviews shown doesn't match the actual count of the reviews OR is the top now finally done excluding all the ratted reviews?

    If my last guess is right, well done

    It would be nice also not to count the N/A reviews there as well. If they are "not applicable" from a review point of view, I don't think they should matter too much in the "Top 30" list either.

    What is the story with this

    (Currently posting using ID "Sensual Delights")

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Dublin Fair City
    Posts
    8,660
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Karin Kiss View Post
    Is there a small glitch in the system in the "Top 30 Reviewed Escorts", where the number of the reviews shown doesn't match the actual count of the reviews OR is the top now finally done excluding all the ratted reviews?
    You are correct, ratted reviews now excluded.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    5,362

    Default

    It was discussed by mods and Patricia asked our views on ratted ones being included in the tally and although she did not say what she intended doing I assume that what you noticed is E-I now not counting ratted ones to determine the top Escorts by number of reviews.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    996
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Well, I have to say I am impressed. Rats not counting in the top list is definitely a very good idea!

    (Currently posting using ID "Sensual Delights")

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •