Mystert Shoppers ....

[thehighwayman]

Don't worry Layla it won't happen. All us e-i clients are just having a dream of the perfect job. I knew we shouldn't have made that trip to the head shop. These things always have that effect. I'm sticking to alcohol anymore for our midweek rants

[Quarterpoundher]

I still don't think this is fair. An extra €10. We pay €100 as it is for 1week! And sometimes I only tour for 4 days!! Most escorts are in this profession to make money for one reason or another, not to have sex with strangers for free. I enjoy my profession most of the time as previously stated but not all the time and I don't want to HAVE to see more clients in a day to pay extra costs. I'm happy with my rates as they are as I feel they attract a certain type of client- a client I can usually converse with and who gives me respect which is part of the pleasure for me. This in turn allows me to provide the highest standard of service to my visitors
Try and empathise with escorts rather than seeing it from one point of view. Some escorts don't give a toss about their reviews, some escorts don't even allow for reviews and then there are other escorts like myself, who gives their all constantly in the hope I will continue to get good reviews which will then, in turn, lead to better promotion of myself...

I only pulled the figure of 10 Euro out of the air as an example and a starting point. I have no idea what the rate increase would be per Escort as no idea how many inspection visits (for want of a better term) would be required per week. 1, 2, 10?

Plus remember it would not be costing you anything as you pass on the extra cost to the customer as happens in any economic enterprise. It would only cost you money to start with and then be re couped by you after just charging the next 10 clients an extra 1 euro, as a compensation for initial cost you could still charge everyone after that 10 a euro so you would be making more in the long run for your initial 10 euro.

Plus would you not see the advantages to this for you by being reviewed by said inspector. If you were an Escort with no reviews yet it would be a big step towards getting a good rep and also would uncover possible very good escorts who at the moment no known reviewer goes near as no reviews. Its a vicious circle that has an inherent closed loop negative feedback.

All this is speculation anyway as E-I cannot be seen to fund sex for re numeration but its an interesting idea and if not for this reason it is workable albeit for the correct price structure.

[thehighwayman]

In this hypothetical job description it wouldn't be escorts like Layla who would be reviewed as they have verified pictures and a number of reviews from well known and trusted reviewers. It's the escorts with the unverified photos and reviews from suspect first time reviewers that this would be for. It would be no benefit for the established escorts to subscribe to this as they have nothing more to gain. The unverified escorts wouldn't subscribe to it either as they wouldn't want clients to find out the truth that their photos are fake and give a bad service. There is a few genuine escorts with unverified photos but their few and far between.It's more of a benefit to clients than escorts I think.

[luther]

Luther, read your PM please xxxxxxxxxx

Now it's a lovely offer, but, I'm just not sure I'm ready to run off to a desert island with you forever.........

Maybe next week...........

[luther]

I hear u QP but how would you react to visiting me for example...
Me: ''Nice to finally meet you QP''

To the reaction of the rest of the forum...............

[thehighwayman]

By the way, thanks HWM xxxxxxxxxx

No problem

[WhenLoveComesToTown]

Yeah its a win win situation for us punters but also for new "GOOD" Escorts.
There are so many beautiful "NEW" Escorts I avoid because they have :
1.no reviews
2.obvious fake positive review
3.negative reviews from pimps trying to damage their reputation
QPH has a good understanding of what I'm saying but as he has advised there would be too many legal implications for EI to get involved in this.
I was throwing the idea out there and this answers it for me ... its a none goer :-(
Ah well nothing ventured nothing gained - its been fun exploring the idea and thanks all for taking the time out to give your opinion on it.

[Quarterpoundher]

I hear u QP but how would you react to visiting me for example...
Me: ''Nice to finally meet you QP''
You: ''How much do I owe you Layla?''
Me: ''That'll be €231''
Sound strange...plus the guys'd have to make sure they brought change AND what happens if I'm in Northern Ireland...(example)
Me: ''Nice to finally meet you HighwayMan!''
HWM: ''How much do I owe you Layla?''
Me: ''Err <typing into currency convertor> That'll be £200.87''
HWM: ''But Layla, your excange rate is way higher than your friends down the road''

I can see where you were going with it QP, n outta all the ideas for this to be funded so far, yours is by far the best! X

Fair points yes. You cant have a bucket of coins for change dragging around after you but really I am sure that these things could be resolved. If it was widely done and became the norm then bringing a 1 euro would be no more hassle then remembering to bring a euro for the trolly at the supermarket is now and if in the north then make it a pound. Its only a few pence in the difference.

At the end of the day we are talking no more then a euro per booking and it would go towards something that would be of benefit to both sides. Clients would get more reliable choice by a known client taking a chance on an unknown Escort without costing him money (if costing time) and Escorts with a thumbs up from said spot check would be placed on a higher plain of regard among pool of potential customers.

[Quarterpoundher]

QPH has a good understanding of what I'm saying but as he has advised there would be too many legal implications for EI to get involved in this.
I was throwing the idea out there and this answers it for me ... its a none goer :-(
Ah well nothing ventured nothing gained - its been fun exploring the idea and thanks all for taking the time out to give your opinion on it.

Not a certain non starter...

If the stated reason for "spot check" and E-I paying someone was for said spot check was for "time and company" etc then I don't see why that would not cover the legal requirements however fig leaf in nature just as it seems to do already.

[Quarterpoundher]

To the reaction of the rest of the forum...............

Just saw that.... cheeky monkey....

read pm pls