Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456
Results 51 to 54 of 54

Thread: Mandatory reviews

  1. #51
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    8,638
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Westsidex View Post
    Legally ppl are entitled to animosity.
    Was that slip Freudian?

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    16,039
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default Nope

    Quote Originally Posted by Patricia View Post
    Was that slip Freudian?
    it was slip Westian,
    Westside.

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    8,431
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Don't worry Patricia.........

    Legally, I don't think you do have to provide the girls with animosity.........

    One less thing to worry about eh................
    "It's far easier to fight for principles than to live up to them."
    L

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    21,994
    Reviews
    113

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Patricia View Post
    I mean they may wish to hide their face and not show all their body. Sure lots of escorts are happy doing both these things, but not all escorts want to. Are you suggesting if an escort like to wear dresses in all her photos and not show her face, we should tell her we need to see her face and also the dress has to come off?
    No Pat I’m not suggesting anything of the sort. But if an escort is to advertise herself in her profile in any form of undress she chooses then the verification picture should be of the same standard. If a girl chooses to put pictures of herself in underwear then your verification pic should be the same for you to verify. Is this unreasonable. Whether she shows her face or not is irrelevant so long as what she does want to show is VERIFIED.

Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •