Mandatory reviews

[katxxx]

Hi,
I think, that there is 2 ways about it. Either complately ban profiles with fake pics.
Second option. Initial profile not be allowed up (or at least no pics at all) until the girl on the pic sends a pic with holding a sign with the date and escort-ireland on it, and repeating sending in a new one every 2-4 weeks and/or every time there is a complaint, we have a ton of community moderators, they could be put in charge of that I think. All other pics should be marked unverified. so the girls with real pics who don't allow reviews could get a pic verification.

IMO girls with fake pictures or who are not willing to comply should not be allowed to advertise. There are girls who only have body parts up, so if someone is so privat, they could just do the same instead of using fakes.

[adogwithabone]

Isn't the easiest thing to do, if you feel so strongly about this,
would just be to not visit escorts who don't allow reviews, and just visit ones who do allow reviews?? has that maybe crossed your mind?

It's their own business and choice if they want them or not. It's DEFINITELY a privacy matter and I would love to see some of you clients as escorts just to feel the vulnerability they feel sometimes.
If they feel like not having reviews makes them feel safer, then so be it, they're not asking for your judgement or probably giving a fuck what you think. I certainly wouldn't, anyway.

Stop behaving as though you have a right to these things, you don't.

I actually do believe that customers should have the right to report false advertising. To say that these escorts do not allow reviews in order to feel safer is one of the most idiotic things that I have heard in a long time. I fully support an escorts right to privacy in respect of any intimate acts that she may have with a client. I do not accept that she has the right to put up fake and misleading photos and to put false details on her profile. That is quite simply fraudulent advertising and I think that customers have every right to try to protect themselves from fraud.
As you say, neither the fakes nor yourself could give a fuck what I think. However, there are some genuine escorts who do not allow reviews. My initiative in respect of mandatory limited reviews is about identifying these genuine escorts as it is about exposing the chancers.

[nicegirlsarenice]

I actually do believe that customers should have the right to report false advertising.

But it's not false advertising because they're not saying that they're definitely the pics. They're saying they MIGHT be the pics. Maybe there should be a HUGE warning saying THESE MAY OR MAY NOT BE THE PICS. Luther said there was one earlier, but maybe like a warning on cigarette packs, a big huge warning. Then there can be no complaining and no fraud.

To say that these escorts do not allow reviews in order to feel safer is one of the most idiotic things that I have heard in a long time.

How sure are you of this? I wouldn't call people/things idiotic if you have no idea of their situation.

I fully support an escorts right to privacy in respect of any intimate acts that she may have with a client. I do not accept that she has the right to put up fake and misleading photos and to put false details on her profile. That is quite simply fraudulent advertising and I think that customers have every right to try to protect themselves from fraud.

Again it's not misleading if there's a big warning on the escort page that it may not be the real pics.

Perhaps they could have something like: "E-I takes no responsibility for the accuracy or lack thereof for these pics".

Would that make you happy? As I see it your opinion on it makes no difference, as you're not the type of person these advertisements are directed towards.

I think you're not so concerned about other punters being misled at all. It's more that YOU are just feeling like YOU might be missing out on extra escorts because you won't take a chance with them. That's tough luck. You can't make escorts do something or get Patricia to do something just because it suits you.

Fuck you and your E-I committing "fraud" and "most idiotic thing I've heard in a long time".

[adogwithabone]

It doesn't matter whether it's a dodgy client or a jealous escort or a pimp, that's irrelevant. It's not like Patricia is punishing clients somehow by doing this, it's just because of the fact that some girls get a lot of fake/bad reviews and aren't comfortable advertising with them.

It's not 'us vs them', maybe Patricia should have added "or other jealous escorts" but it's not relevant to this issue whether it's clients or other escorts that write bad reviews. .

Congratulations on getting the PR job. It is always a case of 'us vs them'. The relevant question is who are 'us' and who are 'them'. In this case, the 'us' are the customers and genuine escorts, while the 'them' are the fraudsters, Patricia and Mia.

[nicegirlsarenice]

"Patricia and Mia are fraudsters," right... well at least everyone has a chance to have their say.

[adogwithabone]

But it's not false advertising because they're not saying that they're definitely the pics. They're saying they MIGHT be the pics. Maybe there should be a HUGE warning saying THESE MAY OR MAY NOT BE THE PICS. Luther said there was one earlier, but maybe like a warning on cigarette packs, a big huge warning. Then there can be no complaining and no fraud.



How sure are you of this? I wouldn't call people/things idiotic if you have no idea of their situation.



Again it's not misleading if there's a big warning on the escort page that it may not be the real pics.

Perhaps they could have something like: "E-I takes no responsibility for the accuracy or lack thereof for these pics".

Would that make you happy? As I see it your opinion on it makes no difference, as you're not the type of person these advertisements are directed towards.

I think you're not so concerned about other punters being misled at all. It's more that YOU are just feeling like YOU might be missing out on extra escorts because you won't take a chance with them. That's tough luck. You can't make escorts do something or get Patricia to do something just because it suits you.

Fuck you and your E-I committing "fraud" and "most idiotic thing I've heard in a long time".

I have to say that having read through this, I have come to the conclusion that one of us has to be crazy. Unfortunately, at this stage, I am not totally convinced that it is you!!!!!!!!!!

[Mioux]

I just think the demanding attitude will get you nowhere and any escorts reading this will be put off by you. You're not in control, they are, so get over it.

There are many reasons girls don't want reviews, i wouldn't want them, although i KNOW i was good. For me it would be a privacy thing. If the client mentions a tattoo, or something else for example...I prefer to keep what goes on between me and the clients between us. i would not be adverse to a 'good' and 'bad' button to click, or giving the escorts a rating out of ten, that would be fine. but these detailed reports are not my cup of tea to have everyone reading. I can understand false pics etc being frustrating, so maybe something to tick saying 'real pics, yes or no?'. or something if they dont allow reviews. It's out of your control.

and would you ever go away with your reporting false advertising, who are you going to report it to now in fairness?? that was the funniest thing i've read in a long time.

It is a matter of choice and privacy, not your decision because youre pissed off a girl you want to see doesnt allow reviews, just go see someone else, and maybe do other things with your day than getting all worked up and spending so much time and effort on this issue.

I was no fake, but i had no profile, limited pics that only 'friends' of me on this site could see, and was not able to advertise.....

yet i still have a PM in my inbox from you asking to see me....

[Prowler]

Hi,
I think, that there is 2 ways about it. Either complately ban profiles with fake pics.
Second option. Initial profile not be allowed up (or at least no pics at all) until the girl on the pic sends a pic with holding a sign with the date and escort-ireland on it, and repeating sending in a new one every 2-4 weeks and/or every time there is a complaint, we have a ton of community moderators, they could be put in charge of that I think. All other pics should be marked unverified. so the girls with real pics who don't allow reviews could get a pic verification.

IMO girls with fake pictures or who are not willing to comply should not be allowed to advertise. There are girls who only have body parts up, so if someone is so privat, they could just do the same instead of using fakes.

That makes sense.

I think girls shouldn't be allowed use photo's that are out of date either. Maybe a "verified but out of date" sign could be used for profile pictures that are years old.

[JAMESCORK]

I have been reading the above with interest and have to say that we are coming down an Adog unnecessarily harshly. The funny thing is at the end of the day we are all saying and agreeing with the same thing. But I do think it is wrong to force a girl to allow reviews, she is entitled to opt out, although I also can’t see how this is for safety reasons. Any escort should be allowed to opt out for privacy reasons only and for no other reason. I know of one girl of whom I gave a bad review who has now opted out. Is this fair.

Nicegirlsarenice said to Adog:
“I think you're not so concerned about other punters being misled at all. It's more that YOU are just feeling like YOU might be missing out on extra escorts because you won't take a chance with them. That's tough luck. You can't make escorts do something or get Patricia to do something just because it suits you.”

Now surely this is an idiotic statement. I don’t know either of you guys but there seems to be a personal element here. We as customers are entitled to make a choice of an escort, and ANY escorts advertised, in good faith. It can NOT be “Tough luck” if we find we are duped. The real people to police this are E.I. staff. If a girl decides not to allow reviews her Photos MUST be authenticated otherwise her ad should not be allowed. E.I. has the power to do this and how hard is it to do.

[JAMESCORK]

As an example of Photos that should be examined take a look at this profile.

Angelica, Dublin Female Agency Escort, profile on Escort Ireland

This profile has been up since I started here 3 years ago. It is stated in the profile that this girl works for an agency but this is not the girls you get. Yet her pics are verified. In 3 years one review (marked a rat) states that this is not the girl. If it is an agency then state it on the profile clearly and stop showing “authenticated” pics of a girl that doesn’t exist. Accurate photos are vital guys!!!