Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: Banned Users Reviews

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    5,608
    Blog Entries
    1
    Reviews
    95

    Default Concerning

    Concerning the point Kelly made about not many reviewers using the forum what u will find is that
    generally on the law of averages if a girl has a few reviews,while it might not be from a reviewer
    with a badge or even someone who uses the forums their will be at least one review from someone
    we would all recognise as a reasonably well known reviewer
    Blatant promotion should be outlawed
    but
    Vincent Browne is a Hero

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    4,869
    Reviews
    28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anon361 View Post
    It's a hard one, while I don't agree with one rule for some and another for others, I think it's only where the Banned User hasn't proven themselves to be a genuine person. Take NBT for example, the reason he got banned would have no bearing on his reviews being genuine or not, we know he's a genuine punter so altough he is banned I wouldn't agree with his reviews being removed or ratted!!
    Where a person leaves 1 or 2 reviews has no post history and gets banned then yes by all means rat his reviews??
    ok fair enough you do have a good point there

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •