Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12

Thread: Reviews in the past

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    16,039
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default 48 hours could be too short

    Quote Originally Posted by El Gordo View Post
    Reviews without a specific date and time should never be accepted. Including reviews which list a date and time, but then say in the text that these are inaccurate. When such reviews are negative it is unfair on the escort because she (or he, if you're into that) can't check whether it was a real appointment. And it would be ridiculous to allow such reviews only when they are positive.

    There is already a rule



    but it doesn't seem to be enforced consistently. I would agree that three months is much too long. I would be happy with 48 hours, if we are allowed to review escorts whose profiles were up within the last 48 hours.
    i would be inclined to give a person a week as in a working week (5 days) and after that no acceptance.

    The trouble with all of this is that if i meet an escort three weeks ago but wait a good while to post the review ,whats stopping me from putting the current date on the review? If its a good review no escort in her right mind is going to come along and say that the date is inaccurate so the review should be removed.Then again if a guy had a good time he be inclined to think of it closer to the time in question and review it closer to that time.Only a guy who is vindictive may come along later with false date and times in order to damage an escort.The fakes,its only the ip and the text and the reputation we have to go by.The dates and time mean nothing unless the escort says so and in this case who is telling the truth?

    dont know,
    Westside.

    Westside.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    838
    Reviews
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Westsidex View Post
    i would be inclined to give a person a week as in a working week (5 days) and after that no acceptance.

    The trouble with all of this is that if i meet an escort three weeks ago but wait a good while to post the review ,whats stopping me from putting the current date on the review? If its a good review no escort in her right mind is going to come along and say that the date is inaccurate so the review should be removed.Then again if a guy had a good time he be inclined to think of it closer to the time in question and review it closer to that time.Only a guy who is vindictive may come along later with false date and times in order to damage an escort.The fakes,its only the ip and the text and the reputation we have to go by.The dates and time mean nothing unless the escort says so and in this case who is telling the truth?

    dont know,
    Westside.

    Westside.
    Hence I think allow an accepted timeframe and if outside this then no review allowed.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •