opinions on religous beliefs

[Doozer]

Now Im not advocating religeon

Its all been bastardiesd and so on and most of it is full of shit anyway so much so

that is funny to see people put so much into what are critically faith statements

that can never be proven one way or another

I think people just like to feel secure that there is somewhere after this place

[Stewie]

Wow Stewie, again commonsence isnt an emperical science is it.

Ok we all know the theroy of the big bang right

and everything started from that

But where did the particals comefrom as nothing was ariund before the big bang?

Haha where is the emperical science that God does exist ???

There isn't any hence it is commonsense that as there is no evidence to support the theory of a god there is no god.

Google the big bounce theory

ie universes have existed before and all matter existed before it contracted and now it is expanding and it will contract again and give rise to a new universe etc etc.

But you don't have to believe that but then who created god and what existed before god ??

[Doozer]

Yes your refering to the big bang and the big crunch right

a kind of eternal re occurence as Nietzche coined it

I know there is no evidence to prove or disprove the existence of God

But if you take it that God always existed it would suggest that he created the particals that

started the big bang and just let everything take it own course through evolution

[Doozer]

One of the main objections to the Big Bounce view is the evidence that has been accumulating that our universe is destined for a Big Freeze or heat death rather than a Big Crunch. However, this evidence does not exclude the possibility that our Big Bang was preceded by the very last Big Crunch, at least the very last one in our vicinity.

Another main objection is that a Big Bounce would reverse entropy by resetting the state of the universe, violating the second law of thermodynamics. Also, the collapse into a singularity would destroy most of the information in the previous universe.

Furthermore, it remains a possibility that a better understanding of quantum foam may result in a re-interpretation of the evidence regarding the fate of our universe

[Westsidex]

One of the main objections to the Big Bounce view is the evidence that has been accumulating that our universe is destined for a Big Freeze or heat death rather than a Big Crunch. However, this evidence does not exclude the possibility that our Big Bang was preceded by the very last Big Crunch, at least the very last one in our vicinity.

Another main objection is that a Big Bounce would reverse entropy by resetting the state of the universe, violating the second law of thermodynamics. Also, the collapse into a singularity would destroy most of the information in the previous universe.

Furthermore, it remains a possibility that a better understanding of quantum foam may result in a re-interpretation of the evidence regarding the fate of our universe

sounds like ice cream or something.I am a firm believer in a higher power but not in this dressed up sense that religons push on ppl.

ladoooooo is God,
Westside.

[WD-40]

never mind all that shite,did any see taps last night.fuckin great programme

[Stewie]

One of the main objections to the Big Bounce view is the evidence that has been accumulating that our universe is destined for a Big Freeze or heat death rather than a Big Crunch. However, this evidence does not exclude the possibility that our Big Bang was preceded by the very last Big Crunch, at least the very last one in our vicinity.

Another main objection is that a Big Bounce would reverse entropy by resetting the state of the universe, violating the second law of thermodynamics. Also, the collapse into a singularity would destroy most of the information in the previous universe.

Furthermore, it remains a possibility that a better understanding of quantum foam may result in a re-interpretation of the evidence regarding the fate of our universe

See you can google.

You can argue against theories with science but your concept is just based on a faith in a supreme being that created everything how many laws of physics and quantam physics does that break.

Tbh we don't understand everything but that is not a reason to believe a supreme being did it. For me that is just lazy just believe in god then you don't have to make sense of anything just say god did it.

[Mc Lovin]

Religion is the perfect way to make good people do bad things and controll people the underlying cause of most of the wars throughout history.

[Doozer]

See you can google.

You can argue against theories with science but your concept is just based on a faith in a supreme being that created everything how many laws of physics and quantam physics does that break.

Tbh we don't understand everything but that is not a reason to believe a supreme being did it. For me that is just lazy just believe in god then you don't have to make sense of anything just say god did it.

That is the faith statment that all religeons cling too

If I am honest the big bounce theroy does make sence, aprt from some eveidence as stated that the universe could well end in the big freeze opr in fire

I am not some God beleiver who clings to an idea of a supreme being that pulls the strings here on earth.

[luther]

God doesn't exist.
Thread ends.

And gay sex then eh....................