Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 789
Results 81 to 83 of 83

Thread: Reviews Rules

  1. #81
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    6,282
    Reviews
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stewie View Post
    You could use a proxy to hide your identity just be careful its not one a troll is using or you could be banned as well

    other than that if you are concerned don't post gory details
    a simple I think is sufficient tells everyone what they need to know
    Good idea Stewie thanks for that, I suppose the best philosophy would be not to post any reviews and just shag the escort.
    Once a prick - always a prick.

  2. #82
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    13,142
    Reviews
    14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rover View Post
    How did you guess, do you think I love that big arse of hers.
    Seriously wow I never would have thought that.
    The Truth is out there.

  3. #83

    Default Sorry it's so long....just giving my thoughts

    Following the subject on my review of 6/12months mentioned on another thread, it seems the new rules have now been written up & implemented which is great. However I cannot overlook the comments made on here without giving my thoughts so I will relay my opinion irrespective of whether anyone is interested or not.

    In my opinion....

    1.It is really not necessary to take 3 months to submit a review – a month is sufficient time – in fact it should take less than a week to relay details about a session with an escort. Does it really take 3 months to think up something to say??! I would question the integrity of a bad review if written more than a month later because I have no way of identifying whether that client/punter is telling the truth. Punters could write up a bad review on 31 October & say he met the Escort on July 1st (3 months ago) irrespective of whether he genuinely met her. The Escort cannot recall due to the length of time so really she has an invalid bad review but she cannot take any action or make an accurate rebuttal. However if a review is done within a week or at most a month she is more than likely to remember & will be able to give her comments.

    2.I appreciate that profiles are suspended once the escorts have stopped touring & this is the argument for EI to set the 3 month time limit. Therefore if EI have a problem with retaining the profiles of escorts on site after they have gone, then it should not be technically impossible to have just a list of names (not the complete profile) on the system in order for punters to submit their reviews within the time limit.

    3.I totally agree with Stewie & MrFussy. Reviewers should be limited to no more than two reviews - one negative and/or one positive. What is the point of multiple reviews _ it is only going to influence the tables. There are clients who will promote an escort for the purpose of getting discounts or freebies – or on the flip side try to damage her reputation for the sake of it. Just because my regulars do not consider it necessary to review me more than once does not mean that I am any better or worst than the others. Escorts who only have single reviews will never reach the top 20 because other escorts have clients who are willing or will be bribed into submitting 3 reviews.

    4.Punters seem to think reviewers who submit reviews on a regular basis are worthy of recognition or escorts who have more than one review from the same client means she is worthy of a visit. However don't you think punters are going to have their personal favourites – of course they are going to be completely biased & submit more than one review especially if they know they are going to get discounts!! It doesn't necessarily mean that the next punter who goes to see Miss Escort is going to have the same experience. If reviews were down to one per client this would also affect the league tables. Clients should not have the opportunity to promote their favourites!

    5.The league tables is also inaccurate when you consider that the bad & ratted reviews are included in the final count. I already mentioned about this when reviews was the subject matter a year ago/ El Gordo highlighted how different the table would look should these be removed. If Escort One has 20 reviews that include 8 bad ones & Escort Two has only 19 reviews but just 2 bad ones doesn't mean that Escort One should be ahead in the league!!

    6. One interesting observation is that some escorts have been in the business since 2006 & are in the top 10 so any escort that started this year - 2009 will never have a hope in getting into the league unless twice as many clients are willing to submit reviews or they resort to bribes. If you check the league, some have moved up faster - smacks of bribes, fake reviews & self-promotion! There are only a few I would say that genuinely deserve to be in the top 20.

    6.Sonny made a valid request that EI include a question whether a punter has seen an escort more than once & how many times. However I have regulars who have not bothered with a review or only done one – they are like El Gordo & Sonny who say the review table has never affected their choices. The reviews are really to aid a decision for punters – so it should only identify whether the escort is positive or negative not that a client favours Miss Escort & wants to promote her.

    Some would think I want to be in the Top 20 but I really don't care as I personally don't think it should exist. Reviews should be genuine & identify whether I am worth seeing or not - some punters see me because of my age, how I look or what I offer so he will not be interested in what other punters think. Punters who are influenced by reviews will see that mine are consistent & more likely to see me because of it so its irrelevant whether a client has seen me more than once or whether Miss Escort A has 50 more reviews than me.

    That says it all I think & I hope it makes sense! I have no doubt that some will criticise me or don't even care what I think but for what its worth, I am entitled to an opinion. I know that nothing said now by me or anybody else is going to influence anything in the future.

    Anyway......Thankyou for reading!
    SCB Lauren

Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 789

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •