Its not often I comment on here but......
I have just read a review that was written about me by Dicklead & I feel compelled to give my opinion on here as well as write a rebuttal.
I complain because I think its totally unacceptable for reviews to be accepted from punters who admit that the session with me or any other escort took place at least three months ago – this guy admitted that it was SIX months ago.
The review written by NBT should also not have been accepted either as he admitted it was TWELVE months ago!! I am in communication with EI about this as I know that another escort who shall remain nameless had her twelve month review removed due to a complaint by another escort. I have been told that my 12month cannot be removed.
In my opinion this is totally unfair.
I have no objection to bad reviews if they are genuine - I cannot please all of the men all of the time however........
a) How am I or any other escort going to recall an incident that happened so long ago – 3/6/9/12 months ago? & be able to offer her reasons or rebuttal accurately?
b) Why should one escort have a twelve month review removed & not mine?
I will point out that if Dicklead was telling the truth about me answering the door then it would have been because I was in a hotel & didn't want the hotel staff to interrupt. I would not have answered the door at any time if I was in an apartment or for any other reason. This guy did not say whether he met me in an apartment or hotel so I cannot comment.
As for his other comments....I cannot recall what happened as it was so long ago. I cannot even identify who he is as he has not given me much to remember.
So.....I have to say its unfair as I am not able to explain what did or did not happen when it happened SIX months ago.......same goes for any other review written more than three months after meeting me.
Interesting to note that Dicklead says he may recommend me so I must have done something right! & more to the point....he has a habit of writing up bad/neutral reviews so.......you draw your own conclusions.
Sorry......I had to vent!
I would agree with you Lauren, a review of a meeting that took place 6 months ago should not be accepted. I know IIE have a time limit on their reviews, not sure but I think its three months. Even that is too generous in my opinion. I think one month is more than enough time for anyone who wishes to write a review.
Thanks for your comments....I totally agree
I think it should be limited to no later than one month after the appointment because too much time will have elapsed beyond that. It is impossible to recall who was seen & what happened when you consider the number of calls/texts & appointments escorts may receive/see over a period of time.
Are you saying my review isnt true
At no stage does Lauren say that NBT's review is untrue.
She does however make the most reasonable request that reviews are posted quickly so that an escort is enabled a right of reply. I believe that most people would agree with this assumption.
NBT stated that he is surprised that Lauren does not get more bad reviews. I decided to have a look at her reviews on adultwork.(It is important that I make the point that adultwork is the UK equivalent of EI and has the best review system available)
The reviews are excellent. She scores 62 positives and 1 negative. All reviews on adultork are either positive-neutral or negative. You can also see the individual reviewers record as to how many reviews they have made and rate of +/- reviews they have given.
I am posting a link to this site - I hope that is OK. If the mods want to remove the link thats OK I will instead pm to any that request it.
*** Link to another site removed. ***
It is important also that NBT has the trust of both the escorts and punters.
There are a lot of punters who give to many plus reviews in my opinion. NBT's reviews, however, do not reflect that and ,appear to me at any rate, to be honest assessments. Its no good to anyone, escort or punter if every review is a 5 star endorsement.
My opinion on this one is even if the review is accurate I think the timeframe is too long between visit and review, a kind of statute of limitations issue if you will.
Finally, for whatever reason (and I am often guilty of this myself) barbs tend to get a greater reaction from us than compliments. This is just human nature. I was going to leave this thread be but I decided to try and do something constructive instead.
I feared that two reputations may be harmed when I believe that the opposite should be the case.
Last edited by carlos marvado; 04-10-09 at 18:23.
Reason: No links to other sites.....bold boy Alec.
Where did I say that???
NBT.....at no time did I say your review was untrue (or even Dickleads' review). My argument is that reviews of more than a month after meeting escorts should not be accepted. Your review of me was TWELVE months after meeting me........you saw approximately 52 escorts & wrote about them before you did mine. Why?
It begs the question why you suddenly decided one year after meeting me that you were going to use soap & time as an issue to say that I should have had more bad reviews. If you had considered that I did not pleasure you sexually throughout the whole session then your comment 'I honestly cant believe why she don't have more bad reviews' would be more justified. I cannot comprehend how what you said would conclude that I am definitely a bad punt. If I was that bad why did you take 12 months to write about it?!!! If anything the review should have been neutral.
You seem indifferent about the fact the incident happened a year ago & I have little or no recollection of you. I think it's only fair that myself & other escorts are able to make a fair comment in response to reviews.
This is why I think reviews more than a month after the incident should not be accepted.
This is what my complaint is about.
Thankyou Alec for your observations & your valid comments.
I am glad someone can appreciate what I am saying.
All I request is that reviews are posted quickly to enable escorts to respond
It occurred to me some would argue that profiles of escorts have disappeared (if she has left) & therefore punters are not able to post reviews. If the month limit on reviews is implemented then EI could retain the profiles on site as invisible in order for punters to post the reviews within the time frame.
Lauren, you're only complaining because it's a negative review. If it had been positive you'd have said nothing.
Thats not true in fairness because u can see where recently a guy gave her a positive review and
Originally Posted by Peter Pussy Eater
she said she never saw him and added a rebuttal to the review to say so.Just look at her reviews and u can verify this. To be honest i think she is only looking for genuine reviews and fair play
I would still disagree cos in my opinion reviews should be within the right time frame.
Irrespective of whether the review was good or bad - NO reviews should be written more than a month after the incident.
It is totally unfair. It is not a fair judgement.
Besides if you didn't like me for whatever reason even if you have never met me you could write up a bad review saying it was 12 months ago
& I would have no idea who you are
You think that is FAIR?? ...>i don't think so as I would not be able to give an accurate response if the incident happened that long ago.
Punters who write up good reviews tend not to leave it for months after the incident!!!