Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: First time reviewers getting ratted

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    3,546
    Blog Entries
    1
    Reviews
    26

    Default Ratting first reviews

    There are good reasons to believe that most first reviews are fake. You might want to read the thread https://www.escort-ireland.com/board...views-not.html.

    Even so, I don't believe that ratting first reviews is a good idea. For one thing, it may put off a lot of genuine reviewers. If my first review had been ratted for no reason I might have decided not write any more. For another, I don't see how ratting first reviews gives the reader any new information. The number of reviews the reviewer has is already written at the top of the page.

    “I wish you wouldn’t keep appearing and vanishing so suddenly; you make one quite giddy!”
    “All right,” said the Cat; and this time it vanished quite slowly, beginning with the end of the tail, and ending with the grin, which remained some time after the rest of it had gone.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    8,431
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Perhaps.......

    Suspicious reviews could be ratted, and first time reviews could carry some other kind of a symbol to show the difference between them........

    Every first time review could carry a symbol, not saying the review is not genuine but letting people know it's the first one, then everybody could expect their first review to carry this and everybody would accept it........
    "It's far easier to fight for principles than to live up to them."
    L

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    2,547
    Reviews
    61

    Default

    hi kelly,


    Not all first time reviews are ratted, most of them just get a note placed on the review.

    As for the examples you gave, there is a reason as why these reviews were ratted.





    nbt
    Last edited by ninebythree; 30-09-09 at 10:07.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    13,142
    Reviews
    14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by luther View Post
    Suspicious reviews could be ratted, and first time reviews could carry some other kind of a symbol to show the difference between them........

    Every first time review could carry a symbol, not saying the review is not genuine but letting people know it's the first one, then everybody could expect their first review to carry this and everybody would accept it........
    Over to NBT ..............................
    The Truth is out there.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    2,547
    Reviews
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by luther View Post
    Suspicious reviews could be ratted, and first time reviews could carry some other kind of a symbol to show the difference between them........

    Every first time review could carry a symbol, not saying the review is not genuine but letting people know it's the first one, then everybody could expect their first review to carry this and everybody would accept it........

    thx luther,


    maybe u might send that to Patricia aswell, coz she might listen to you

    that was one of the original suggestions that came from forum and it too as been ignored.

    If i there was a symbol like that , it would save me typing , and i would have more time for punting


    nbt

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    2,547
    Reviews
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KellyCurvybabe View Post
    but if you have just said that there is no reason why these reviews were ratted then why were they?

    kelly,

    I never said that now did i


    nbt

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    393
    Reviews
    35

    Default

    The vast majority of genuine punters do not go to the bother of registering just to leave one review of one girl. They will already have seen a number of girls and will see more in the future that they will want to review. They will also likely have comments to make on the boards. My own guess is that as much as 95% of once-off reviews are fake. I think that all once-off reviews should auto-delete after 2/3 months if there is no further activity by the reviewer. Yes, we will loose some genuine reviews but you have to look at the overall benifit to the system.

  8. #8

    Default Not all firsttime reviews are ratted

    I have noticed many reviews are not ratted as firsttimers I think that there must be a valid reason for reviews to be ratted if they are firsttime. I also dont think that NBT could tell us the exact reasons as if he did this would only make it harder for him to spot rats as he must have a method he uses to do this and it would be pretty pointless that he tells the board openly cos then everyone knows his methods...

    Dogwithabone again I agree with you about what you have written I tend to like your ideas as they are genuine and a way to avoid the fakes....I also really dont think that a person unless a very rare case would join the site to only write one review ever but there are also a small percentage of people who could do this as thier personal status could change and they may not want to meet ladies again. This would be very far and few inbetween though. Alot of members do not really contribute to the boards this I can understand....
    Will MISS you all... For those of you that will keep in touch you know how to do this.... Take Care Kisses Alyssa Jenkins xxxx

  9. #9

    Default ist time reviewers getting ratted

    I must be SO slow on the uptake, whenever I saw "REGISTERED TO LEAVE REVIEW" NBT, I assumed NBT ment "New But True"!! Tonyb

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    2,547
    Reviews
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tonybgood View Post
    I must be SO slow on the uptake, whenever I saw "REGISTERED TO LEAVE REVIEW" NBT, I assumed NBT ment "New But True"!! Tonyb


    pmsl



    nbt

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •