Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 27

Thread: sexonwheels - Banned On IIE

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    360

    Default sexonwheels - Banned On IIE

    I am aware that some members on here are also members of IIE (Hiway, Alec, Notatwork,espensen etc). You will be therefore most likely also be aware of the recent debate surrounding sexonwheels and coffee's signature.

    I have linked the two relevant threads. Please read to conclusion of each and feel free to discuss the issue herein as I am sure that it will be regarded as relevant and therefore of interest to you all.
    **** url removed *******
    Last edited by Ad Staff; 05-09-09 at 09:41. Reason: no links to IIE please

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    2,547
    Reviews
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Banned User View Post
    I am aware that some members on here are also members of IIE (Hiway, Alec, Notatwork,espensen

    Know u now some one else

    nbt

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    1,049
    Reviews
    49

    Default

    Hey Banned user, I read those posts that you atached from IIE, thank you for those as i did not realise that there was a forum on that website and it read very good, I could not believe that Leah and Popti actually participate on it and appear to be regular users, Leah is a class act, I am sure EI wont be too happy you advertising for the other site, but hey I am signing up today as it does seem to be a good forum

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,241
    Reviews
    4

    Default

    In relation to the first forum I do find it shocking the signature used by that 'escort' is over the top there is something else behind such blatant racism how would that yoke feel if I was a male escort & saidno n*****s allowed
    Last edited by carlos marvado; 05-09-09 at 18:30. Reason: Offensive term edited

  5. #5

    Default

    It may be that she might not have a wheelchair accessible apartment...also i do remember posts on here about a con man using his disability to con girls....so im not surprised by these posts.

    JL

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    393
    Reviews
    35

    Default

    Having read the threads, I have to say that I agree totally with Sexonwheels. I think that Coffee's signature is gratuitously offensive and I am surprised that she seems to be allowed to maintain it. I have to say that Coffee seems like the kind of escort that I would avoid like the plague.

    I have to say that this whole IIE thing extremely disappointing. We need a strong IIE to keep E-I on their toes and IIE seem to be in self destruct mode for years now while E-I is getting more dominant all the time. It seems to me that the basic format of IIE works reasonably well but they seem to be losing advertising from all but the older UK escorts. Does anyone know what is going on?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    5,608
    Blog Entries
    1
    Reviews
    95

    Default Amusing

    Quote Originally Posted by adogwithabone View Post
    Having read the threads, I have to say that I agree totally with Sexonwheels. I think that Coffee's signature is gratuitously offensive and I am surprised that she seems to be allowed to maintain it. I have to say that Coffee seems like the kind of escort that I would avoid like the plague.

    I have to say that this whole IIE thing extremely disappointing. We need a strong IIE to keep E-I on their toes and IIE seem to be in self destruct mode for years now while E-I is getting more dominant all the time. It seems to me that the basic format of IIE works reasonably well but they seem to be losing advertising from all but the older UK escorts. Does anyone know what is going on?
    What i find kinda amusing is that there isnt a word about her sig but he got banned for 2 weeks
    for hijacking a thread(be no one left here if that was done)
    There is no need whatsoever for that sig as there is already an option on her profile which
    says whether she is disabled friendly or not.
    Now it cant be inconviencing her that much even to answer wheelchair users and say no
    she dosent see them as i cant imagine that the numbers ringing would be huge
    Ihave to agree with EP while the discretion who she sees is always and rightly so with
    the lady the manner in which she announces it shouldnt be such as to offend people

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    11,820
    Reviews
    35

    Default

    I think sexonwheels was treated unfairly. Her signature is a more serious offense than him hijacking a thread. He has every right to be angry about it. She shouldn't have put that in her signature. All she had to do on her ad was put a no on where it says wheelchair accessability. An escort has every right to see who she likes but that's not the way to do things. I don't think she even tours here now as her last tour was advertised for 2007. Maybe I should go over and give Jake a lesson on modding. I would've removed the signature. That's me banned now for 2 weeks
    Help Keyla in her fight with cancer. Every little helps.
    It could happen to any of us.
    https://gofund.me/8e340537

  9. #9

    Default

    IIE used to be the dominant site for me but I hardly ever look at it now. It's like a ghost town and EI is now, by far, the superior site in every way.



  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,241
    Reviews
    4

    Default

    theres nobody offended least of all myself if an escort doesn't want to see a person in a wheelchair I've never had that experience myself but this has nothing to do with that, it has everything to do with other motives this 'escort' has only her own miserable self knows that, how on earth she was allowed to get away with it truly beggars belief It most certainly wouldn't have happened on this website....

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •