Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 27

Thread: sexonwheels - Banned On IIE

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    16,039
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default Thats Bullshit

    Quote Originally Posted by experienced punter View Post
    In relation to the first forum I do find it shocking the signature used by that 'escort' is over the top there is something else behind such blatant racism how would that yoke feel if I was a male escort & saidno n*****s allowed
    you cant compare her sig with what your comparing it to ffs.I had a look at her sig and to be honest i cant see the big problem at all.She simply states she wont see wheelchair users.Whats wrong with that?she isnt mocking anyone,it cant be referred to in any other way (if she said she wont see ppl with disabilities ,it would mean differently).How does a person refer to someone in a wheelchair so?

    She could have her reasons for it such as not having wheelchair access etc.Its her business and her perogative.

    Having said all that i just checked her sig and didnt read the threads because to be honest i couldnt give a toss about it.If she mocks anyone in a wheelchair then that is a different ballgame but stating it in her sig isnt a nasty by any means.Having said that i cant see the point in banning a guy who had issue with it either.

    Westside.


    PS by the way.If you had said that "you wouldnt see any black ppl then there is nothing wrong with that.Im not going into this whole discrimination stuff because i think its being beaten to death for far too long by now.
    Last edited by carlos marvado; 05-09-09 at 18:31. Reason: Offensive term in quotation edited

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,241
    Reviews
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Westsidex View Post
    you cant compare her sig with what your comparing it to ffs.I had a look at her sig and to be honest i cant see the big problem at all.She simply states she wont see wheelchair users.Whats wrong with that?she isnt mocking anyone,it cant be referred to in any other way (if she said she wont see ppl with disabilities ,it would mean differently).How does a person refer to someone in a wheelchair so?

    She could have her reasons for it such as not having wheelchair access etc.Its her business and her perogative.

    Having said all that i just checked her sig and didnt read the threads because to be honest i couldnt give a toss about it.If she mocks anyone in a wheelchair then that is a different ballgame but stating it in her sig isnt a nasty by any means.Having said that i cant see the point in banning a guy who had issue with it either.

    Westside.


    PS by the way.If you had said that "you wouldnt see any black ppl then there is nothing wrong with that.Im not going into this whole discrimination stuff because i think its being beaten to death for far too long by now.
    Its the usual rubbish coming out of u - absolute tripe

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    16,039
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default Well ,answer this for me so Einstein.

    Quote Originally Posted by experienced punter View Post
    Its the usual rubbish coming out of u - absolute tripe
    Whats more tripe.

    Someone giving an honest opinion on a heated issue or

    "I wanna pull me Mickey off"
    "my gf left me"
    "i have a pain in my head"
    "i just met a girl.I only know her five hours but should i tell her i go to escorts?"

    I could go on.

    By the way,shoot yourself.That will solve all of your issues.

    Hugs and kisses,
    Westside.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    8,431
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default And so you should........

    Quote Originally Posted by sexonwheels View Post
    I sill stand my what I have said, and I will do
    What a load of BS.......

    First of all she should have delete or edited it herself when you contacted her about it..........

    I think it shows utter contempt by her the way it carried on and I think you have been unfairly treated as a result.......

    A simple solution would have been for a moderator to edit her sig to read "cannot see disabled people"..........

    Not that I think it need to be said in a sig anyway but I would have thought it would have been the better compromise............
    "It's far easier to fight for principles than to live up to them."
    L

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    635
    Reviews
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sexonwheels View Post
    I wanted to firstly say I haven’t been banned for life its just a two week suspension, its got nothing whatsoever to do with me high jacking a thread its just designed so that in a week or so everything will blow over and be forgotten about, sadly this isn’t going to be the case

    Secondly I want to thank those punters who have backed me on this issue.

    Thirdly I don’t know what or if anything has been added over on IIE about it as its pointless for me to read it at the moment as I cant log-in so there’s no point in reading it further getting annoyed at some of the rubbish that’ll be written about it and not being able to respond to it.

    Finally I want to say I have NEVER said that an escort doesn’t have the right to see whoever she does or does not want to see, that’s it end off, its her right of course but to have this on her signature to be seen by everyone every single time she posts on the board is just down right disgraceful.

    Many, many times in the past I’ve contacted an escort via telephone or email/PM and asked about appointments only to be told they’re not wheelchair friendly and that’s been it, end off, move on, forget about it, but this method however is just unacceptable.

    I’d held my lip for a very long time, years in fact, but enough was enough I felt this week as she’d been posting all roads and direction on the board ramming it down people like myself’s throat.

    There is no way on this wide earthly world an escort would get away with posting on her signature she wont see black people for example, there would be uproar from both punters and the board mods, this however seems to be accepted.

    At the end of the day, I believe I should be getting praised from IIE for breathing a bit of life and debate back into what is nothing more than a dying board. lol

    I sill stand my what I have said, and I will do
    having read over it

    i,d be on your side and agree with the signature issue.


    i,d agree too that starting a new thread would have been a better approach to dealing with the issue, even though most threads go off topic, anyway, (unfortunately important ones). then again real or fake boobs is a banter thread.


    also referring sarcastically, even though you were provoked, to the disabled as gimps didnt help without having a united front first.


    even so, a 2 week ban is ott, a moderator can usually sort thing out amicably by pm,s or with proper direction in a debate ime.



    solidarity with sexonwheels





    bbj
    Last edited by Bigbadjohn; 05-09-09 at 17:01.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    13,142
    Reviews
    14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by experienced punter View Post
    theres nobody offended least of all myself if an escort doesn't want to see a person in a wheelchair I've never had that experience myself but this has nothing to do with that, it has everything to do with other motives this 'escort' has only her own miserable self knows that, how on earth she was allowed to get away with it truly beggars belief It most certainly wouldn't have happened on this website....
    I agree with EP on this topic.
    I rarely look at IIE but I know for sure that an escort on this site would never have been allowed to have a comment like that on her signature.
    It is absolutely disgraceful.
    The Truth is out there.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    13,142
    Reviews
    14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by luther View Post
    What a load of BS.......

    First of all she should have delete or edited it herself when you contacted her about it..........

    I think it shows utter contempt by her the way it carried on and I think you have been unfairly treated as a result.......

    A simple solution would have been for a moderator to edit her sig to read "cannot see disabled people"..........

    Not that I think it need to be said in a sig anyway but I would have thought it would have been the better compromise............
    Obviously it never occurred to IIE to do that.
    The Truth is out there.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    16,039
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default They couldnt make it stick thats why

    Quote Originally Posted by westcorklad View Post
    Obviously it never occurred to IIE to do that.
    Its no different than ticking a box.Its pretty much the same thing.In her sig she didnt mock wheelchair users,simply stated that she wont see them ,the very same as if she ticked a box.Its a business and if it were possible to discriminate it wouldnt stick legally.

    If she went on to mock disabled ppl then thats wrong and she should be booted for that but as far as her sig goes,i dont think the mods there could ask her to remove it and make it stick anymore than the facility in ticking a box.

    Thats one thing i find alot in business of all sorts.Ppl come along and say they are paying for this or that and ppl switch to the personal level with stuff.Business is business and if she paid and no rule existes as to what she said in the sig then they couldnt make the removal stick.

    Funny though how you agree with Ex P who used the word he used in his example.Even though it was only an example ,he still referred to black ppl by this name.I, even in the midst of my tripe never did that.

    Westside.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    16,039
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default Collect ten crisp packs and get a brain

    Quote Originally Posted by experienced punter View Post
    In relation to the first forum I do find it shocking the signature used by that 'escort' is over the top there is something else behind such blatant racism how would that yoke feel if I was a male escort & saidno n*****s allowed
    You know i said nothing earlier because to be honest im busy today but its funny how you criticise her (whetehr right or wrong) and then actaully give an example by stating probably the most offensive name that could be thought up for a black person.

    your not on meds or anything are you?
    Westside.
    Last edited by carlos marvado; 05-09-09 at 18:33. Reason: Offensive term in quotation edited

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    8,431
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default But it's not the same thing..........

    Quote Originally Posted by Westsidex View Post
    Its no different than ticking a box.Its pretty much the same thing.
    If it was then why didn't she just tic the box???

    IMO her advertising/advising of the fact that she couldn't, wouldn't or doesn't cater for disabled people was over the top............

    I think it has been edited again with "so please stop asking" added in.............
    "It's far easier to fight for principles than to live up to them."
    L

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •